Journal of Building Engineering, volume 72, pages 106689

Effect of agricultural olive, rice husk and sugarcane leaf waste ashes on sustainable ultra-high-performance concrete

Mana Alyami 1
Mohamed Amin 1
A.M. Zeyad 2
Abdullah M Zeyad 3
Ibrahim Y Hakeem 4
Ibrahim Saad Agwa 2, 5
4
 
Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Gaza, P.O. Box 108, Gaza Strip, Palestine
5
 
Department of Civil Engineering, EL-Arish High Institute for Engineering and Technology, EL-Arish, North Sinai, Egypt
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2023-08-01
scimago Q1
SJR1.397
CiteScore10.0
Impact factor6.7
ISSN23527102
Mechanics of Materials
Building and Construction
Civil and Structural Engineering
Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Architecture
Abstract
The accumulation of agricultural waste is a growing environmental problem in many countries. Therefore, this study focuses on the assimilation of large quantities of agricultural waste ash as a partial substitute for Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) to produce Sustainable Ultra High-Performance Concrete (SUHPC). Local agricultural residue ash from rice husk (RHA), sugarcane leaf ash (SLA), and olive waste ash (OWA) were used to replace 50% of the weight of the OPC. Sixteen mixtures were prepared by replacing the OPC with agricultural residue ash of RHA, SLA, and OWA at 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% by weight. The effect of using RHA, SLA, and OWA on the properties of UHPC in terms of slump flow, compressive strength, tensile strength, flexural strength, and modulus of elasticity was evaluated. As well as water sorptivity and permeability, and chloride penetration of SUHPC were also evaluated. The results indicated that SUHPC could be prepared when replacing 50% of the OPC weight with (SLA 25% + RHA25%) with a compressive, tensile, and flexural strength of more than 155, 19, and 27 MPa, respectively. Moreover, substituting 50 wt% OPC with (RHA) reduced the water permeability and chloride penetration to 1.45 × 10−6 cm/s and 220 Coulombs, respectively.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?