volume 240 pages 152988

Genetic architecture of glucosinolate variation in Brassica napus

Varanya Kittipol 1, 2, 3
Zhesi He 1, 2, 3
Lihong Wang 1, 2, 3
Tim Doheny Adams 1, 2, 3
Swen Langer 1, 2, 3
Ian Bancroft 1, 2, 3
1
 
Department of Biology
3
 
Heslington York YO10 5DD UK
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2019-09-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.106
CiteScore8.6
Impact factor4.1
ISSN01761617, 16181328
Plant Science
Agronomy and Crop Science
Physiology
Abstract
The diverse biological activities of glucosinolate (GSL) hydrolysis products play significant biological and economical roles in the defense system and nutritional qualities of Brassica napus (oilseed rape). Yet, genomic-based study of the B. napus GSL regulatory mechanisms are scarce due to the complexity of working with polyploid species. To address these challenges, we used transcriptome-based GWAS approach, Associative Transcriptomics (AT), across a diversity panel of 288 B. napus genotypes to uncover the underlying genetic basis controlling quantitative variation of GSLs in B. napus vegetative tissues. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and gene expression markers (GEMs) associations identify orthologues of MYB28/HAG1 (AT5G61420), specifically the copies on chromosome A9 and C2, to be the key regulators of aliphatic GSL variation in leaves. We show that the positive correlation observed between aliphatic GSLs in seed and leaf is due to the amount synthesized, as controlled by Bna.HAG1.A9 and Bna.HAG1.C2, rather than by variation in the transport processes. In addition, AT and differential expression analysis in root tissues implicate an orthologue of MYB29/HAG3 (AT5G07690), Bna.HAG3.A3, as controlling root aromatic GSL variation. Based on the root expression data we also propose Bna.MAM3.A3 to have a role in controlling phenylalanine chain elongation for aromatic GSL biosynthesis. This work uncovers a regulator of homophenylalanine-derived aromatic GSLs and implicates the shared biosynthetic pathways between aliphatic and aromatic GSLs.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
Genes
3 publications, 6.38%
Frontiers in Plant Science
3 publications, 6.38%
Agronomy
2 publications, 4.26%
Euphytica
2 publications, 4.26%
Phytochemistry
2 publications, 4.26%
The CRISPR Journal
1 publication, 2.13%
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
1 publication, 2.13%
Scientific Reports
1 publication, 2.13%
Biology
1 publication, 2.13%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
1 publication, 2.13%
Plants
1 publication, 2.13%
aBIOTECH
1 publication, 2.13%
Theoretical And Applied Genetics
1 publication, 2.13%
Horticultural Plant Journal
1 publication, 2.13%
Data in Brief
1 publication, 2.13%
Food Chemistry
1 publication, 2.13%
Plant Journal
1 publication, 2.13%
Plant Biotechnology Journal
1 publication, 2.13%
New Phytologist
1 publication, 2.13%
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1 publication, 2.13%
Journal of Experimental Botany
1 publication, 2.13%
Plant Physiology
1 publication, 2.13%
Molecular Breeding
1 publication, 2.13%
Advances in Botanical Research
1 publication, 2.13%
Cell Host and Microbe
1 publication, 2.13%
Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
1 publication, 2.13%
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions
1 publication, 2.13%
Trends in Plant Science
1 publication, 2.13%
International Journal of Plant Biology
1 publication, 2.13%
1
2
3

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
MDPI
9 publications, 19.15%
Elsevier
8 publications, 17.02%
Springer Nature
7 publications, 14.89%
Wiley
6 publications, 12.77%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
6 publications, 12.77%
Frontiers Media S.A.
3 publications, 6.38%
Oxford University Press
2 publications, 4.26%
Mary Ann Liebert
1 publication, 2.13%
The Royal Society
1 publication, 2.13%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1 publication, 2.13%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 2.13%
Scientific Societies
1 publication, 2.13%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
47
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Kittipol V. et al. Genetic architecture of glucosinolate variation in Brassica napus // Journal of Plant Physiology. 2019. Vol. 240. p. 152988.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Kittipol V., He Z., Wang L., Doheny Adams T., Langer S., Bancroft I. Genetic architecture of glucosinolate variation in Brassica napus // Journal of Plant Physiology. 2019. Vol. 240. p. 152988.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.jplph.2019.06.001
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2019.06.001
TI - Genetic architecture of glucosinolate variation in Brassica napus
T2 - Journal of Plant Physiology
AU - Kittipol, Varanya
AU - He, Zhesi
AU - Wang, Lihong
AU - Doheny Adams, Tim
AU - Langer, Swen
AU - Bancroft, Ian
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/09/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 152988
VL - 240
PMID - 31255878
SN - 0176-1617
SN - 1618-1328
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2019_Kittipol,
author = {Varanya Kittipol and Zhesi He and Lihong Wang and Tim Doheny Adams and Swen Langer and Ian Bancroft},
title = {Genetic architecture of glucosinolate variation in Brassica napus},
journal = {Journal of Plant Physiology},
year = {2019},
volume = {240},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2019.06.001},
pages = {152988},
doi = {10.1016/j.jplph.2019.06.001}
}