Open Access
Open access

Comparative evaluation of alternative Bayesian semi-parametric spatial crash frequency models

Gurdiljot Singh Gill 1
Wen Cheng 1
Mankirat Singh 1
Yihua Li 2
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-02-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.544
CiteScore13.9
Impact factor6.8
ISSN20957564
Abstract
Albeit with the notable benefits associated with Dirichlet crash frequency models and spatial ones, there is little research dedicated to exploring their combined advantages. Such ensemble approach could be a viable alternative to existing models as it accounts for the unobserved heterogeneity by relaxing the constraints of specific distribution placed on the intercept while addressing the spatial correlations among roadway entities. To fill this gap, the authors aimed to develop Dirichlet semi-parametric models over the over-dispersed generalized linear model framework while also incorporating spatially structured random effects using a distance-based weight matrix.Five models were developed which include four semi-parametric with flexible intercept and one parametric base model for comparison purposes. The four semi-parametric models entailed two models with a popular specification of stick-breaking Dirichlet process (DP) and two models with an alternative approach of Dirichlet distribution (DD), which are first applied in the field of traffic safety. All four models were estimated for mixture of points (discrete) and mixture of normals (continuous). The posterior density plots for the precision parameter justified the employment of the flexible Dirichlet approach to fit the crash data and supported the assumed prior for the precision parameter. All four Dirichlet models demonstrated the presence of distinct subpopulations suggesting that the intercepts of the models were not generated from a common distribution. The DP model based on mixture of normals illustrated better performance indicating its potential superiority to fit both in-sample and out-of-sample crash data. This finding indicated that the approach of continuous densities, unlike discrete points, may lend more flexibility to fit the data.
Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
0
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Gill G. S. et al. Comparative evaluation of alternative Bayesian semi-parametric spatial crash frequency models // Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition). 2025. Vol. 12. No. 1. pp. 151-166.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Gill G. S., Cheng W., Singh M., Li Y. Comparative evaluation of alternative Bayesian semi-parametric spatial crash frequency models // Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition). 2025. Vol. 12. No. 1. pp. 151-166.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.jtte.2022.01.005
UR - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2095756425000133
TI - Comparative evaluation of alternative Bayesian semi-parametric spatial crash frequency models
T2 - Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition)
AU - Gill, Gurdiljot Singh
AU - Cheng, Wen
AU - Singh, Mankirat
AU - Li, Yihua
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/02/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 151-166
IS - 1
VL - 12
SN - 2095-7564
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2025_Gill,
author = {Gurdiljot Singh Gill and Wen Cheng and Mankirat Singh and Yihua Li},
title = {Comparative evaluation of alternative Bayesian semi-parametric spatial crash frequency models},
journal = {Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition)},
year = {2025},
volume = {12},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {feb},
url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2095756425000133},
number = {1},
pages = {151--166},
doi = {10.1016/j.jtte.2022.01.005}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Gill, Gurdiljot Singh, et al. “Comparative evaluation of alternative Bayesian semi-parametric spatial crash frequency models.” Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), vol. 12, no. 1, Feb. 2025, pp. 151-166. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2095756425000133.