Cognitive factive verbs across languages
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2022-03-01
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR: 0.587
CiteScore: 3.2
Impact factor: 1.1
ISSN: 03880001, 18735746
Linguistics and Language
Language and Linguistics
Abstract
In the last few years, the traditional analysis of know as a factive verb has been lively debated by linguists and philosophers of language: several scholars have pointed out that know may be used non-factively in ordinary language. The aim of the present study is to expand this inquiry to other cognitive factive verbs than know , such as discover , realize , etc., and to investigate cross-linguistically the question of whether know and other cognitive factive verbs may occur in non-factive contexts, that is, in contexts where it is clear that the embedded proposition is false. Moreover, we investigate whether so-called evidential uses of cognitive factive verbs are acceptable across languages. We administered an online survey to native speakers of nine different languages (English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Serbian, Spanish, and Swedish), and we found considerable cross-linguistic variation in the acceptability of the use of know and other cognitive factive verbs in non-factive contexts. For Italian and English, we put forward the claim that non-factive uses of cognitive factives instantiate a case of polysemy resulting from a process of semantic change that moves along a three-step pattern: from a factive sense to a more general non-factive sense to a non-factive sense characterized by an evidential function. • Cognitive factive verbs are investigated cross-linguistically. • Know and other cognitive factive verbs are used non-factively in ordinary language. • Cognitive factive verbs may be used to fulfill an evidential strategy. • An Acceptability Judgment Task was submitted to native speakers of nine languages. • Evidential uses may be a step in a process of defactivization of factive verbs.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
|
|
|
Journal of Pragmatics
1 publication, 33.33%
|
|
|
Languages
1 publication, 33.33%
|
|
|
Journal of the American Philosophical Association
1 publication, 33.33%
|
|
|
1
|
Publishers
|
1
|
|
|
Elsevier
1 publication, 33.33%
|
|
|
MDPI
1 publication, 33.33%
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 33.33%
|
|
|
1
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
3
Total citations:
3
Citations from 2024:
1
(33.33%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101458
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101458
TI - Cognitive factive verbs across languages
T2 - Language Sciences
AU - Colonna, Dahlman
AU - van, de
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/03/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 101458
VL - 90
SN - 0388-0001
SN - 1873-5746
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2022_Colonna,
author = {Dahlman Colonna and de van},
title = {Cognitive factive verbs across languages},
journal = {Language Sciences},
year = {2022},
volume = {90},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101458},
pages = {101458},
doi = {10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101458}
}