Methylmercury production in sediments of Chesapeake Bay and the mid-Atlantic continental margin
1
Department of Marine Sciences
2
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT
|
3
Groton Connecticut 06340 USA
|
4
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Road, PO Box 28, Edgewaer, Maryland 21037, USA
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2009-05-01
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR: 0.887
CiteScore: 5.0
Impact factor: 2.5
ISSN: 03044203, 18727581
General Chemistry
Environmental Chemistry
Water Science and Technology
Oceanography
Abstract
Methylmercury (MeHg) concentration and production rates were studied in bottom sediments along the mainstem of Chesapeake Bay and on the adjoining continental shelf and slope. Our objectives were to 1) observe spatial and temporal changes in total mercury (HgT) and MeHg concentrations in the mid-Atlantic coastal region, 2) investigate biogeochemical factors that affect MeHg production, and 3) examine the potential of these sediments as sources of MeHg to coastal and open waters. Estuarine, shelf and slope sediments contained on average 0.5 to 1.5% Hg as MeHg (% MeHg), which increased significantly with salinity across our study site, with weak seasonal trends. Methylation rate constants ( k meth ), estimated using enriched stable mercury isotope spikes to intact cores, showed a similar, but weaker, salinity trend, but strong seasonality, and was highly correlated with % MeHg. Together, these patterns suggest that some fraction of MeHg is preserved thru seasons, as found by others [Orihel, D.M., Paterson, M.J., Blanchfield, P.J., Bodaly, R.A., Gilmour, C.C., Hintelmann, H., 2008. Temporal changes in the distribution, methylation, and bioaccumulation of newly deposited mercury in an aquatic ecosystem. Environmental Pollution 154, 77] Similar to other ecosystems, methylation was most favored in sediment depth horizons where sulfate was available, but sulfide concentrations were low (between 0.1 and 10 μM). MeHg production was maximal at the sediment surface in the organic sediments of the upper and mid Bay where oxygen penetration was small, but was found at increasingly deeper depths, and across a wider vertical range, as salinity increased, where oxygen penetration was deeper. Vertical trends in MeHg production mirrored the deeper, vertically expanded redox boundary layers in these offshore sediments. The organic content of the sediments had a strong impact on the sediment:water partitioning of Hg, and therefore, on methylation rates. However, the HgT distribution coefficient ( K D ) normalized to organic matter varied by more than an order of magnitude across the study area, suggesting an important role of organic matter quality in Hg sequestration. We hypothesize that the lower sulfur content organic matter of shelf and slope sediments has a lower binding capacity for Hg resulting in higher MeHg production, relative to sediments in the estuary. Substantially higher MeHg concentrations in pore water relative to the water column indicate all sites are sources of MeHg to the water column throughout the seasons studied. Calculated diffusional fluxes for MeHg averaged ∼ 1 pmol m − 2 day − 1 . It is likely that the total MeHg flux in sediments of the lower Bay and continental margin are significantly higher than their estimated diffusive fluxes due to enhanced MeHg mobilization by biological and/or physical processes. Our flux estimates across the full salinity gradient of Chesapeake Bay and its adjacent slope and shelf strongly suggest that the flux from coastal sediments is of the same order as other sources and contributes substantially to the coastal MeHg budget.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
13 publications, 9.49%
|
|
|
Environmental Science & Technology
12 publications, 8.76%
|
|
|
Environmental Research
7 publications, 5.11%
|
|
|
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
6 publications, 4.38%
|
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
5 publications, 3.65%
|
|
|
Journal of Hazardous Materials
5 publications, 3.65%
|
|
|
Chemosphere
5 publications, 3.65%
|
|
|
Marine Chemistry
5 publications, 3.65%
|
|
|
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
4 publications, 2.92%
|
|
|
Applied Geochemistry
4 publications, 2.92%
|
|
|
Environmental Pollution
4 publications, 2.92%
|
|
|
Water Research
4 publications, 2.92%
|
|
|
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
|
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
|
Marine Pollution Bulletin
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
|
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Biogeosciences
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Journal of Soils and Sediments
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Journal of Environmental Sciences
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Water (Switzerland)
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Journal of Great Lakes Research
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Chemical Geology
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Limnology and Oceanography
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Environmental Sciences: Processes and Impacts
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Water Resources Research
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Publishers
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
|
Elsevier
70 publications, 51.09%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
22 publications, 16.06%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
12 publications, 8.76%
|
|
|
Wiley
8 publications, 5.84%
|
|
|
MDPI
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
|
Copernicus
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
International Association for Great Lakes Research
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Environmental Health Perspectives
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
|
EDP Sciences
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
137
Total citations:
137
Citations from 2024:
12
(8.76%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Hollweg T. et al. Methylmercury production in sediments of Chesapeake Bay and the mid-Atlantic continental margin // Marine Chemistry. 2009. Vol. 114. No. 3-4. pp. 86-101.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Hollweg T., Gilmour C. C., Mason R. Methylmercury production in sediments of Chesapeake Bay and the mid-Atlantic continental margin // Marine Chemistry. 2009. Vol. 114. No. 3-4. pp. 86-101.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.marchem.2009.04.004
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2009.04.004
TI - Methylmercury production in sediments of Chesapeake Bay and the mid-Atlantic continental margin
T2 - Marine Chemistry
AU - Hollweg, T
AU - Gilmour, Cynthia C.
AU - Mason, R.P.
PY - 2009
DA - 2009/05/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 86-101
IS - 3-4
VL - 114
SN - 0304-4203
SN - 1872-7581
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2009_Hollweg,
author = {T Hollweg and Cynthia C. Gilmour and R.P. Mason},
title = {Methylmercury production in sediments of Chesapeake Bay and the mid-Atlantic continental margin},
journal = {Marine Chemistry},
year = {2009},
volume = {114},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {may},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2009.04.004},
number = {3-4},
pages = {86--101},
doi = {10.1016/j.marchem.2009.04.004}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Hollweg, T., et al. “Methylmercury production in sediments of Chesapeake Bay and the mid-Atlantic continental margin.” Marine Chemistry, vol. 114, no. 3-4, May. 2009, pp. 86-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2009.04.004.