Technological assessments on recent developments in fine and coarse particle flotation systems
Ahmad Hassanzadeh
1, 2
,
Mehdi Safari
3
,
Duong Thi Anh Hoang
2, 4
,
Hamid Khoshdast
5
,
Boris Albijanic
6
,
Przemyslaw B. Kowalczuk
1
2
Maelgwyn Mineral Services Ltd, Ty Maelgwyn, 1A Gower Road, Cathays, Cardiff CF24 4PA, United Kingdom
|
3
Minerals Processing Division, Mintek, Private Bag X3015, Randburg 2125, South Africa
|
4
5
Department of Mining Engineering, Higher Education Complex of Zarand, 7761156391 Zarand, Iran
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2022-04-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 1.101
CiteScore: 9.2
Impact factor: 5.0
ISSN: 08926875
General Chemistry
Mechanical Engineering
Control and Systems Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Abstract
• Froth flotation of fine and coarse particles is studied, focusing on cell designs. • Generating micro-bubbles, intensive turbulence, and high gas hold-up are advantages of intensified cells. • Scaling up/down procedures for the intensified cells are found unclear. • Positioning the optimum location of discussed cells in flotation circuits is found challenging. After more than a century applying flotation to the mining industry, two completely different strategies have been introduced for processing purposes. One is the classical approach viz. grinding ores to a certain extent (fine particles) and floating them via conventional mechanical and pneumatic cells i.e., Jameson, Imhoflot™ and Reflux™. This strategy continues because mines face declining cut-off grades, complex and poly-mineralized ores, and they are required to achieve an acceptable degree of mineral liberation. The other school of thought deals with coarse particle processes mainly owing to the low energy requirements, that includes SkimAir® flash, fluidized bed and HydroFloat™ cells. There is no study in the literature to comparatively present the recent developments of flotation apparatuses versus the conventional mechanical cells. To cover this knowledge gap in the literature, the present paper endeavors to critically evaluate these concepts from several points of view, including existing technological advancements, water and energy usage, kinetics, and circuit design. A brief introduction of advanced technologies, along with their applications is presented. The data from literature and case studies showed that the Jameson, Imhoflot™ and recently developed Reflux™ flotation cells can be very effective for recovering fine particles owing to their specific hydrodynamic designs, intensive energy dissipation rate and generation of micron-sized bubbles (100–700 µm). Very low (less than a few minutes) mean particle residence time, high gas-hold up (ca. 50–70 %), no agitation and high efficiency of particle-bubble collision were identified as their main advantages compared to traditional mechanical flotation cells. In addition to their common applications in cleaner stage, these cells were used in pre-flotation and scalping (producing final concentrate from the rougher feed) duties. Their main challenges were recognized as relatively unclear procedure on their scale up/down, optimization and simulation. The HydroFloat™ cell was indicated as a promising technology for recovering coarse particle fraction sizes by taking advantage of the fluidized-bed concept with plug-flow dispersion regime, high particle residence time, and limited cell turbulence. We finally concluded that fine particle flotation may remain as the main focus of re-processing tailings dams, while coarse particle treatment should be the focus of this century to reduce total energy consumptions.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
|
Minerals Engineering
33 publications, 30.56%
|
|
|
Minerals
15 publications, 13.89%
|
|
|
Powder Technology
8 publications, 7.41%
|
|
|
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
5 publications, 4.63%
|
|
|
Chemical Engineering Journal
3 publications, 2.78%
|
|
|
Separation and Purification Technology
3 publications, 2.78%
|
|
|
Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
|
Fuel
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
|
Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
|
Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
|
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
|
Separation Science and Technology
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
|
Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Journal of Water Process Engineering
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
ACS Omega
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Advanced Ceramics
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Journal of Energy Storage
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Fluid Dynamics Research
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Journal of Environmental Management
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Molecules
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Mathematics
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Applied Surface Science
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Physics of Fluids
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Publishers
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
|
Elsevier
72 publications, 66.67%
|
|
|
MDPI
19 publications, 17.59%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
7 publications, 6.48%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
4 publications, 3.7%
|
|
|
Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
IOP Publishing
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
Wiley
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
AIP Publishing
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
109
Total citations:
109
Citations from 2024:
71
(65.74%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Hassanzadeh A. et al. Technological assessments on recent developments in fine and coarse particle flotation systems // Minerals Engineering. 2022. Vol. 180. p. 107509.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Hassanzadeh A., Safari M., Hoang D. T. A., Khoshdast H., Albijanic B., Kowalczuk P. B. Technological assessments on recent developments in fine and coarse particle flotation systems // Minerals Engineering. 2022. Vol. 180. p. 107509.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107509
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107509
TI - Technological assessments on recent developments in fine and coarse particle flotation systems
T2 - Minerals Engineering
AU - Hassanzadeh, Ahmad
AU - Safari, Mehdi
AU - Hoang, Duong Thi Anh
AU - Khoshdast, Hamid
AU - Albijanic, Boris
AU - Kowalczuk, Przemyslaw B.
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/04/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 107509
VL - 180
SN - 0892-6875
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2022_Hassanzadeh,
author = {Ahmad Hassanzadeh and Mehdi Safari and Duong Thi Anh Hoang and Hamid Khoshdast and Boris Albijanic and Przemyslaw B. Kowalczuk},
title = {Technological assessments on recent developments in fine and coarse particle flotation systems},
journal = {Minerals Engineering},
year = {2022},
volume = {180},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107509},
pages = {107509},
doi = {10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107509}
}