volume 489 pages 271-308

Groundwater level prediction using machine learning models: A comprehensive review

Hai Tao 1, 2, 3
Mohammed Ali Rashid Hameed 4
Haydar Abdulameer Marhoon 5, 6
Salim Heddam 8
Sungwon Kim 9
Sadeq Oleiwi Sulaiman 10
Mou Leong Tan 11
Zulfaqar Saadi 12
Ali Jafari Mehr 13
Mohammed Falah Allawi 10
S I Abba 14, 15
Jasni Mohamad Zain 16
Mayadah Falah 17
Mehdi Jamei 18
Maryam Bayatvarkeshi 20
Mustafa Al-Mukhtar 21
Suraj Kumar Bhagat 22
Tiyasha Tiyasha 22
2
 
School of Computer Sciences, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Shaanxi, China
3
 
School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Ankang University, China
8
 
Faculty of Science, Agronomy Department, Hydraulics Division University, 20 Août 1955, Route EL HADAIK, 26 Skikda, BP, Algeria
9
 
Department of Railroad Construction and Safety Engineering, Dongyang University, Yeongju, 36040, South Korea
16
 
Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, University Technology MARA, Malaysia
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-06-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.471
CiteScore13.6
Impact factor6.5
ISSN09252312, 18728286
Computer Science Applications
Artificial Intelligence
Cognitive Neuroscience
Abstract
Developing accurate soft computing methods for groundwater level (GWL) forecasting is essential for enhancing the planning and management of water resources. Over the past two decades, significant progress has been made in GWL prediction using machine learning (ML) models. Several review articles have been published, reporting the advances in this field up to 2018. However, the existing review articles do not cover several aspects of GWL simulations using ML, which are significant for scientists and practitioners working in hydrology and water resource management. The current review article aims to provide a clear understanding of the state-of-the-art ML models implemented for GWL modeling and the milestones achieved in this domain. The review includes all of the types of ML models employed for GWL modeling from 2008 to 2020 (138 articles) and summarizes the details of the reviewed papers, including the types of models, data span, time scale, input and output parameters, performance criteria used, and the best models identified. Furthermore, recommendations for possible future research directions to improve the accuracy of GWL prediction models and enhance the related knowledge are outlined.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
Water (Switzerland)
22 publications, 7.8%
Journal of Hydrology
17 publications, 6.03%
Groundwater for Sustainable Development
15 publications, 5.32%
Hydrology
7 publications, 2.48%
Environmental Modelling and Software
7 publications, 2.48%
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
6 publications, 2.13%
Environmental Earth Sciences
6 publications, 2.13%
Water Resources Research
6 publications, 2.13%
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
5 publications, 1.77%
Science of the Total Environment
5 publications, 1.77%
Earth Science Informatics
5 publications, 1.77%
Sustainability
4 publications, 1.42%
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
4 publications, 1.42%
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
4 publications, 1.42%
Journal of Hydroinformatics
4 publications, 1.42%
Scientific Reports
4 publications, 1.42%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
3 publications, 1.06%
Remote Sensing
3 publications, 1.06%
Journal of Cleaner Production
3 publications, 1.06%
Heliyon
3 publications, 1.06%
Water Science and Technology: Water Supply
3 publications, 1.06%
Applied Water Science
3 publications, 1.06%
Hydrological Processes
3 publications, 1.06%
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering - ASCE
2 publications, 0.71%
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
2 publications, 0.71%
Desalination
2 publications, 0.71%
Agricultural Water Management
2 publications, 0.71%
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
2 publications, 0.71%
Hydrogeology Journal
2 publications, 0.71%
5
10
15
20
25

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Elsevier
95 publications, 33.69%
Springer Nature
65 publications, 23.05%
MDPI
45 publications, 15.96%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
14 publications, 4.96%
Wiley
12 publications, 4.26%
IWA Publishing
11 publications, 3.9%
Taylor & Francis
7 publications, 2.48%
American Geophysical Union
5 publications, 1.77%
Frontiers Media S.A.
4 publications, 1.42%
Copernicus
4 publications, 1.42%
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
2 publications, 0.71%
Research Square Platform LLC
2 publications, 0.71%
IGI Global
2 publications, 0.71%
AIP Publishing
2 publications, 0.71%
King Saud University
1 publication, 0.35%
Ain Shams University
1 publication, 0.35%
IOP Publishing
1 publication, 0.35%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1 publication, 0.35%
The Korean Society of Economic and Environmental Geology
1 publication, 0.35%
Tsinghua University Press
1 publication, 0.35%
Emerald
1 publication, 0.35%
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.35%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
286
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Tao H. et al. Groundwater level prediction using machine learning models: A comprehensive review // Neurocomputing. 2022. Vol. 489. pp. 271-308.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Tao H., Rashid Hameed M. A., Marhoon H. A., Zounemat-Kermani M., Heddam S., Kim S., Sulaiman S. O., Tan M. L., Saadi Z., Mehr A. J., Allawi M. F., Abba S. I., Zain J. M., Falah M., Jamei M., Bokde N. D., Bayatvarkeshi M., Al-Mukhtar M., Bhagat S. K., Tiyasha T. Groundwater level prediction using machine learning models: A comprehensive review // Neurocomputing. 2022. Vol. 489. pp. 271-308.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.03.014
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.03.014
TI - Groundwater level prediction using machine learning models: A comprehensive review
T2 - Neurocomputing
AU - Tao, Hai
AU - Rashid Hameed, Mohammed Ali
AU - Marhoon, Haydar Abdulameer
AU - Zounemat-Kermani, Mohammad
AU - Heddam, Salim
AU - Kim, Sungwon
AU - Sulaiman, Sadeq Oleiwi
AU - Tan, Mou Leong
AU - Saadi, Zulfaqar
AU - Mehr, Ali Jafari
AU - Allawi, Mohammed Falah
AU - Abba, S I
AU - Zain, Jasni Mohamad
AU - Falah, Mayadah
AU - Jamei, Mehdi
AU - Bokde, Neeraj Dhanraj
AU - Bayatvarkeshi, Maryam
AU - Al-Mukhtar, Mustafa
AU - Bhagat, Suraj Kumar
AU - Tiyasha, Tiyasha
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/06/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 271-308
VL - 489
SN - 0925-2312
SN - 1872-8286
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_Tao,
author = {Hai Tao and Mohammed Ali Rashid Hameed and Haydar Abdulameer Marhoon and Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani and Salim Heddam and Sungwon Kim and Sadeq Oleiwi Sulaiman and Mou Leong Tan and Zulfaqar Saadi and Ali Jafari Mehr and Mohammed Falah Allawi and S I Abba and Jasni Mohamad Zain and Mayadah Falah and Mehdi Jamei and Neeraj Dhanraj Bokde and Maryam Bayatvarkeshi and Mustafa Al-Mukhtar and Suraj Kumar Bhagat and Tiyasha Tiyasha},
title = {Groundwater level prediction using machine learning models: A comprehensive review},
journal = {Neurocomputing},
year = {2022},
volume = {489},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {jun},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.03.014},
pages = {271--308},
doi = {10.1016/j.neucom.2022.03.014}
}