volume 96 pages 102261

How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2020-10-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR2.308
CiteScore14.9
Impact factor7.2
ISSN03050483, 18735274
Strategy and Management
Information Systems and Management
Management Science and Operations Research
Abstract
Decision making is a complex task that involves a multitude of perspectives, constraints, and variables. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a process that has been used for several decades to support decision making. It includes a series of steps that systematically help Decision Maker(s) (DM(s)) and stakeholders in structuring a decision making problem, identifying their preferences, and building a decision recommendation consistent with those preferences. Over the last decades, many studies have demonstrated the conduct of the MCDA process and how to select an MCDA method. Until now, there has not been a review of these studies, nor a proposal of a unified and comprehensive high-level representation of the MCDA process characteristics (i.e., features), which is the goal of this paper. We introduce a review of the research that defines how to conduct the MCDA process, compares MCDA methods, and presents Decision Support Systems (DSSs) to recommend a relevant MCDA method or a subset of methods. We then synthesize this research into a taxonomy of characteristics of the MCDA process, grouped into three main phases, (i) problem formulation, (ii) construction of the decision recommendation, and (iii) qualitative features and technical support. Each of these phases includes a subset of the 10 characteristics that helps the analyst implementing the MCDA process, while also being aware of the implication of these choices at each step. By showing how decision making can be split into manageable and justifiable steps, we reduce the risk of overwhelming the analyst, as well as the DMs/stakeholders during the MCDA process. A questioning strategy is also proposed to demonstrate how to apply the taxonomy to map MCDA methods and select the most relevant one(s) using real case studies. Additionally, we show how the DSSs for MCDA method recommendation can be grouped into three main clusters. This proposal can enhance a traceable and categorizable development of such systems.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
European Journal of Operational Research
11 publications, 4.38%
Sustainability
9 publications, 3.59%
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
9 publications, 3.59%
Procedia Computer Science
8 publications, 3.19%
Omega
8 publications, 3.19%
Annals of Operations Research
7 publications, 2.79%
Mathematics
6 publications, 2.39%
Applied Soft Computing Journal
6 publications, 2.39%
Journal of Cleaner Production
6 publications, 2.39%
Symmetry
5 publications, 1.99%
Science of the Total Environment
5 publications, 1.99%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
4 publications, 1.59%
Expert Systems with Applications
4 publications, 1.59%
Journal of the Operational Research Society
4 publications, 1.59%
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
4 publications, 1.59%
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
4 publications, 1.59%
Energies
3 publications, 1.2%
Algorithms
3 publications, 1.2%
Operational Research
3 publications, 1.2%
Ecological Indicators
3 publications, 1.2%
Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
3 publications, 1.2%
Journal of Risk and Financial Management
2 publications, 0.8%
Electronics (Switzerland)
2 publications, 0.8%
Computers and Industrial Engineering
2 publications, 0.8%
Knowledge-Based Systems
2 publications, 0.8%
Information Sciences
2 publications, 0.8%
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
2 publications, 0.8%
Technological and Economic Development of Economy
2 publications, 0.8%
Studies in Systems, Decision and Control
2 publications, 0.8%
2
4
6
8
10
12

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Elsevier
92 publications, 36.65%
Springer Nature
55 publications, 21.91%
MDPI
48 publications, 19.12%
Taylor & Francis
11 publications, 4.38%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
8 publications, 3.19%
Wiley
6 publications, 2.39%
Frontiers Media S.A.
4 publications, 1.59%
SAGE
3 publications, 1.2%
Emerald
3 publications, 1.2%
IOP Publishing
2 publications, 0.8%
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
1 publication, 0.4%
EDP Sciences
1 publication, 0.4%
ComSIS Consortium
1 publication, 0.4%
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
1 publication, 0.4%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.4%
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.4%
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 0.4%
Editura ASE Bucuresti
1 publication, 0.4%
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 0.4%
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
1 publication, 0.4%
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
1 publication, 0.4%
SciELO
1 publication, 0.4%
Copernicus
1 publication, 0.4%
World Scientific
1 publication, 0.4%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 0.4%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
251
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Cinelli M. et al. How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy // Omega. 2020. Vol. 96. p. 102261.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Cinelli M., Kadziński M., Słowiński R. How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy // Omega. 2020. Vol. 96. p. 102261.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102261
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102261
TI - How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy
T2 - Omega
AU - Cinelli, Marco
AU - Kadziński, Miłosz
AU - Słowiński, Roman
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/10/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 102261
VL - 96
PMID - 33746337
SN - 0305-0483
SN - 1873-5274
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2020_Cinelli,
author = {Marco Cinelli and Miłosz Kadziński and Roman Słowiński},
title = {How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy},
journal = {Omega},
year = {2020},
volume = {96},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {oct},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102261},
pages = {102261},
doi = {10.1016/j.omega.2020.102261}
}