Entropy: A controversy between experiment and calculations in grain boundary segregation
1
Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Slovance 2, CZ-182 00 Praha 8, Czech Republic
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2025-05-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 8.566
CiteScore: 70.0
Impact factor: 40.0
ISSN: 00796425, 18732208
Abstract
Grain boundary segregation is one of the crucial phenomena affecting the properties of the materials and their technological applications. However, 50 years since starting its intensive study, there still remain open questions and controversies related to this phenomenon. Probably, the most serious uncertainty consists in understanding the segregation entropy. While this term seems to result directly from experimental studies of temperature dependence of chemical composition of grain boundaries, it is mostly neglected in theoretical calculations. This negligence arises from the fact that most of the first-principles calculations are performed at the temperature of 0 K and, therefore, the segregation entropy is usually not evaluated. Consequently, it is supposed that its contribution at enhanced temperatures is negligible which is supported by scarce calculations of the vibrational entropy of grain boundary segregation. Another question discussed presently between theoreticians on one hand and experimenters on the other hand deals with physical meaning of the values of the thermodynamic quantities determined from the average grain boundary concentration.This paper summarizes the present knowledge on the segregation entropy in metallic hosts and documents some issues in which the segregation entropy plays important and irreplaceable role. These issues are represented by the enthalpy–entropy compensation effect, by the method of prediction of grain boundary segregation and by comparison of calculated results and experimental or predicted data. The role of the entropy is also crucial in the recently discussed cases of the entropy-dominated and entropy-driven grain boundary segregation. Finally, collective processes related to grain boundaries – grain boundary migration and intergranular fracture – are discussed suggesting that these processes, based on coordinated behavior of numerous neighbor atoms in the grain boundary core, will be better characterized by average values of characteristic quantities rather than by the values of these quantities for individual sites.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
|
|
|
Computational Materials Science
1 publication, 50%
|
|
|
Materials
1 publication, 50%
|
|
|
1
|
Publishers
|
1
|
|
|
Elsevier
1 publication, 50%
|
|
|
MDPI
1 publication, 50%
|
|
|
1
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
2
Total citations:
2
Citations from 2024:
2
(100%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Lejček P., Šob M. Entropy: A controversy between experiment and calculations in grain boundary segregation // Progress in Materials Science. 2025. Vol. 151. p. 101431.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Lejček P., Šob M. Entropy: A controversy between experiment and calculations in grain boundary segregation // Progress in Materials Science. 2025. Vol. 151. p. 101431.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2025.101431
UR - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0079642525000064
TI - Entropy: A controversy between experiment and calculations in grain boundary segregation
T2 - Progress in Materials Science
AU - Lejček, Pavel
AU - Šob, Mojmír
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/05/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 101431
VL - 151
SN - 0079-6425
SN - 1873-2208
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2025_Lejček,
author = {Pavel Lejček and Mojmír Šob},
title = {Entropy: A controversy between experiment and calculations in grain boundary segregation},
journal = {Progress in Materials Science},
year = {2025},
volume = {151},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {may},
url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0079642525000064},
pages = {101431},
doi = {10.1016/j.pmatsci.2025.101431}
}