Social Networks, volume 66, pages 50-64

Using social network analysis to study crime: Navigating the challenges of criminal justice records

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2021-07-01
Journal: Social Networks
scimago Q1
SJR1.157
CiteScore5.9
Impact factor2.9
ISSN03788733, 18792111
Sociology and Political Science
Anthropology
General Psychology
General Social Sciences
Abstract
• Data from criminal justice records has been sourced from all points in the criminal justice process. • Criminal justice records can facilitate SNA on criminals and criminal groups. • Criminal justice records suffer from challenges and limitations. • We articulate the challenges and provide recommendations about the use of criminal justice records to undertake SNA. The use of social network analysis to study groups of offenders engaged in illicit activities such as drug trafficking and terrorism has grown in popularity over the last three decades. Along with such growth, however, researchers have been confronted with a suite of challenges related to the use of data extracted from criminal justice records. In this paper, we review these challenges through a discussion of the extant empirical literature utilizing social network analysis approaches that draw data from the criminal justice system. First, we outline and discuss the different types of data used across this literature. Second, we chronicle the challenges that have emerged across the field of criminal networks via a comprehensive review of the literature. In particular, we draw on the documented experiences of researchers in the field, including our own, and detail “archeological” approaches that future researchers can utilize to adapt and overcome said challenges. The use of criminal justice records can suffer from a number of limitations, mainly with respect to accuracy, validity and reliability. Such data may include errors, both intentional (e.g. aliases, false information) and unintentional (e.g. transcription errors), including missing data. The use of criminal justice records present particular problems with defining the network boundary as the boundary as determined by law enforcement or prosecution agencies may not correspond to the boundary as defined by network members. We conclude by offering a number of recommendations for researchers about data collection and preparation when utilizing criminal justice records.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
2
4
6
8
10
12
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?