Structural analyses of segmental lining – coupled beam and spring analyses versus 3D-FEM calculations with shell elements
1
PSP Consulting Engineers for Tunnelling and Foundation Engineering, Munich, Germany
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2006-05-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 2.269
CiteScore: 13.0
Impact factor: 7.4
ISSN: 08867798, 18784364
Building and Construction
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Abstract
In contrast to the inner lining of a NATM tunnel the lining of a TBM driven tunnel consists of single precast concrete segments which are articulated or coupled at the longitudinal and circumferential joints. Therefore not only the characteristics of the concrete segments influence the structure but also the mechanical and geometrical characteristics of the joints strongly affect the structural behaviour of the tunnel lining. For the simulation of these joints within the tunnel lining different calculation methods are known. In contrast to the inner lining of a NATM tunnel the lining of a TBM driven tunnel consists of single precast concrete segments which are articulated or coupled at the longitudinal and circumferential joints. Therefore not only the characteristics of the concrete segments influence the structure but also the mechanical and geometrical characteristics of the joints strongly affect the structural behaviour of the tunnel lining. For the simulation of these joints within the tunnel lining different calculation methods are known. (A) This paper was presented at Safety in the underground space - Proceedings of the ITA-AITES 2006 World Tunnel Congress and the 32nd ITA General Assembly, Seoul, Korea, 22-27 April 2006. For the covering abstract see ITRD E129148. “Reprinted with permission from Em Elsevier”.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
5
10
15
20
|
|
|
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
20 publications, 33.33%
|
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
3 publications, 5%
|
|
|
Engineering Failure Analysis
3 publications, 5%
|
|
|
Structural Concrete
3 publications, 5%
|
|
|
Engineering Structures
2 publications, 3.33%
|
|
|
Advances in Civil Engineering
2 publications, 3.33%
|
|
|
Journal of Engineering Mechanics - ASCE
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
MATEC Web of Conferences
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Engineering Computations
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Sensors
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Geomechanik und Tunnelbau
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Acta Geotechnica
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Acta Mechanica
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Advanced Engineering Informatics
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Computers and Geotechnics
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Underground Space (China)
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Lowland Technology International
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Finite Elements in Analysis and Design
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
|
Publishers
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
|
Elsevier
30 publications, 50%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
7 publications, 11.67%
|
|
|
Wiley
6 publications, 10%
|
|
|
MDPI
5 publications, 8.33%
|
|
|
Hindawi Limited
3 publications, 5%
|
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
2 publications, 3.33%
|
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
EDP Sciences
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
Emerald
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
IOP Publishing
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
International Association of Lowland Technology
1 publication, 1.67%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
60
Total citations:
60
Citations from 2024:
8
(13.33%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Klappers C., Grübl F., Ostermeier B. Structural analyses of segmental lining – coupled beam and spring analyses versus 3D-FEM calculations with shell elements // Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2006. Vol. 21. No. 3-4. pp. 254-255.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Klappers C., Grübl F., Ostermeier B. Structural analyses of segmental lining – coupled beam and spring analyses versus 3D-FEM calculations with shell elements // Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2006. Vol. 21. No. 3-4. pp. 254-255.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.tust.2005.12.116
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.12.116
TI - Structural analyses of segmental lining – coupled beam and spring analyses versus 3D-FEM calculations with shell elements
T2 - Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
AU - Klappers, C
AU - Grübl, F
AU - Ostermeier, B
PY - 2006
DA - 2006/05/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 254-255
IS - 3-4
VL - 21
SN - 0886-7798
SN - 1878-4364
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2006_Klappers,
author = {C Klappers and F Grübl and B Ostermeier},
title = {Structural analyses of segmental lining – coupled beam and spring analyses versus 3D-FEM calculations with shell elements},
journal = {Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology},
year = {2006},
volume = {21},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {may},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.12.116},
number = {3-4},
pages = {254--255},
doi = {10.1016/j.tust.2005.12.116}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Klappers, C., et al. “Structural analyses of segmental lining – coupled beam and spring analyses versus 3D-FEM calculations with shell elements.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 21, no. 3-4, May. 2006, pp. 254-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.12.116.