Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, volume 61, pages 127105

Linking public urban green spaces and human well-being: A systematic review

Rosa Reyes Riveros 1
Adison Altamirano 1
Francisco De La Barrera 2
Daniel Rozas Vásquez 3
Lorena Vieli 4, 5
Paula Meli 1
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2021-06-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.619
CiteScore11.7
Impact factor6
ISSN16188667, 16108167
Soil Science
Ecology
Forestry
Abstract
Public urban green spaces provide people with many benefits. Understanding the relationship between public urban green spaces’ characteristics and human well-being components may assist in future planning and design of these spaces. This study performed a systematic bibliographic review to analyse the relationships between green spaces' specific characteristics and human well-being components. The green spaces characteristics found in 153 articles were divided in four groups: structure, biodiversity, naturalness , and others; while dimensions of human well-being were divided into four groups: health, security, good social relations, and freedom of choice and action. The number of green spaces and their percentage of vegetation cover and size (structure category) improved human well-being, in all aspects, especially in health. Structure and biodiversity are the characteristics most highly rated in the literature. These green spaces’ biodiversity and naturalness contribute to human well-being through improvements in health (particularly mental health) and good social relations. The most frequently methods used to assess the relationship of public urban green spaces and human well-being are mainly oriented towards studying perception of the green space’s users. This result highlights an opportunity to assess the congruence between methods evaluating perception and objective measurement. Our findings may provide tools for decision-makers to integrate green spaces into planning, identifying specific characteristics of public urban green spaces that promote human well-being and to face climate change.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
30
5
10
15
20
25
30

Publishers

20
40
60
80
100
120
20
40
60
80
100
120
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?