Open Access
Measuring enhanced recovery in obstetrics: a narrative review
1
From the Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College Hospital, London, England (Dr. Ciechanowicz)
3
Department of Anesthesia, St. Paul's Hospital, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, Canada (Dr. Ke, Dr. Sharawi, Dr. Sultan)
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2023-02-01
PubMed ID:
36699096
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery is a protocolized approach to perioperative care, with the aim to optimize maternal recovery after surgery. It is associated with improved maternal and neonatal outcomes, including decreased length of hospital stay, opioid consumption, pain scores, complications, increased maternal satisfaction, and increased breastfeeding success. However, the pace and enthusiasm of adoption of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery internationally has not yet been matched with high-quality evidence demonstrating its benefit, and current studies provide low- to very low-quality evidence in support of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. This article provides a summary of current measures of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery success, and optimal measures of inpatient and outpatient postpartum recovery. We summarize outcomes from 22 published enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery implementation studies and 2 meta-analyses. A variety of disparate metrics have been used to measure enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery success, including process measures (length of hospital stay, bundle compliance, preoperative fasting time, time to first mobilization, time to urinary catheter removal), maternal outcomes (patient-reported outcome measures, complications, opioid consumption, satisfaction), neonatal outcomes (breastfeeding success, Apgar scores, maternal-neonatal bonding), cost savings, and complication rates (maternal readmission rate, urinary recatheterization rate, neonatal readmission rate). A core outcome set for use in enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery studies has been developed through Delphi consensus, involving stakeholders including obstetricians, anesthesiologists, patients, and a midwife. Fifteen measures covering key aspects of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery adoption are recommended for use in future enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery implementation studies. The use of these outcome measures could improve the quality of evidence surrounding enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. Using evidence-based evaluation guidelines developed by the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) group, the Obstetric Quality of Recovery score (ObsQoR) was identified as the best patient-reported outcome measure for inpatient postpartum recovery. Advances in our understanding of postpartum recovery as a multidimensional and dynamic construct have opened new avenues for the identification of optimum patient-reported outcome measures in this context. The use of standardized measures such as these will facilitate pooling of data in future studies and improve overall levels of evidence surrounding enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. Larger studies with optimal study designs, using recommended outcomes including patient-reported outcome measures, will reduce variation and improve data quality to help guide future recommendations.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
|
|
|
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
3 publications, 23.08%
|
|
|
Anesthesia and Analgesia
2 publications, 15.38%
|
|
|
Current Anesthesiology Reports
1 publication, 7.69%
|
|
|
BJA Open
1 publication, 7.69%
|
|
|
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
1 publication, 7.69%
|
|
|
Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology
1 publication, 7.69%
|
|
|
Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine
1 publication, 7.69%
|
|
|
European Journal of Anaesthesiology
1 publication, 7.69%
|
|
|
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology
1 publication, 7.69%
|
|
|
Journal of Health Psychology
1 publication, 7.69%
|
|
|
1
2
3
|
Publishers
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
|
|
Elsevier
6 publications, 46.15%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
4 publications, 30.77%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
2 publications, 15.38%
|
|
|
SAGE
1 publication, 7.69%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
13
Total citations:
13
Citations from 2024:
12
(92.3%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Ciechanowicz S. et al. Measuring enhanced recovery in obstetrics: a narrative review // AJOG Global Reports. 2023. Vol. 3. No. 1. p. 100152.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Ciechanowicz S., Ke J. X. C., Sharawi N., Sultan P. Measuring enhanced recovery in obstetrics: a narrative review // AJOG Global Reports. 2023. Vol. 3. No. 1. p. 100152.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100152
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100152
TI - Measuring enhanced recovery in obstetrics: a narrative review
T2 - AJOG Global Reports
AU - Ciechanowicz, S
AU - Ke, Janny Xue Chen
AU - Sharawi, Nadir
AU - Sultan, P.
PY - 2023
DA - 2023/02/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 100152
IS - 1
VL - 3
PMID - 36699096
SN - 2666-5778
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2023_Ciechanowicz,
author = {S Ciechanowicz and Janny Xue Chen Ke and Nadir Sharawi and P. Sultan},
title = {Measuring enhanced recovery in obstetrics: a narrative review},
journal = {AJOG Global Reports},
year = {2023},
volume = {3},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {feb},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100152},
number = {1},
pages = {100152},
doi = {10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100152}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Ciechanowicz, S., et al. “Measuring enhanced recovery in obstetrics: a narrative review.” AJOG Global Reports, vol. 3, no. 1, Feb. 2023, p. 100152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100152.
Profiles