Analytica Chimica Acta, volume 1162, pages 338304

Highly reproducible solid contact ion selective electrodes: Emerging opportunities for potentiometry – A review

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2021-06-01
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q1
Impact factor6.2
ISSN00032670, 18734324
Biochemistry
Spectroscopy
Analytical Chemistry
Environmental Chemistry
Abstract
The solid contact ion-selective electrodes (SC-ISEs) have been extensively studied in the field of ion sensing as they offer the possibility of miniaturization, are relatively inexpensive in comparison to other analytical techniques and allow straightforward and routine analyses of ions in a number of clinical, environmental and industrial process samples. In recent years, significant interest has grown in the development of SC-ISEs with well-defined interfacialpotentials at the membrane, solid contact, and substrate electrode interfaces. This has resulted in interesting SC-ISEs exhibiting high electrode-to-electrode potential reproducibility, for those made in a single batch of electrodes, some approaching or exceeding those observed in liquid-contact ISEs. The advancement in the potential reproducibility of SC-ISEs has been partially achieved by scrutinizing insufficiently reproducible fabrication methods of SC-ISEs, or by introducing novel control measures or modifiers to components of the ISEs. This paper provides an overview of the methods as well as the challenges in establishing and maintaining reproducible potentials during the fabrication and use of novel SC-ISEs. The rules outlined in the works reviewed may form the basis of further development of cost-effective, user-friendly, limited calibration or calibration-free potentiometric SC-ISEs to achieve reliable ion analyses here and now . • Critical review of potentiometric ion sensors with reproducible standard potentials. • Discuss external and internal control measures of the standard potentials. • Discuss factors affecting reproducibility on potentiometric sensors. • Provide possible future directions in the domain of reproducible sensors.

Top-30

Citations by journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
6 publications, 8.45%
Analytical Chemistry
6 publications, 8.45%
ACS Sensors
4 publications, 5.63%
Sensors
3 publications, 4.23%
Membranes
3 publications, 4.23%
Analytica Chimica Acta
3 publications, 4.23%
Chemosensors
2 publications, 2.82%
Talanta
2 publications, 2.82%
Microchemical Journal
2 publications, 2.82%
Environmental Pollution
2 publications, 2.82%
Electroanalysis
2 publications, 2.82%
The Analyst
2 publications, 2.82%
Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research
2 publications, 2.82%
Frontiers in Chemistry
1 publication, 1.41%
Polymers
1 publication, 1.41%
Materials
1 publication, 1.41%
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
1 publication, 1.41%
Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
1 publication, 1.41%
Current Opinion in Electrochemistry
1 publication, 1.41%
TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry
1 publication, 1.41%
Electrochemistry Communications
1 publication, 1.41%
Small
1 publication, 1.41%
Advanced Science
1 publication, 1.41%
ACS Measurement Science Au
1 publication, 1.41%
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems
1 publication, 1.41%
Materials Chemistry Frontiers
1 publication, 1.41%
Advanced Materials
1 publication, 1.41%
Biosensors
1 publication, 1.41%
Chemical Papers
1 publication, 1.41%
1
2
3
4
5
6

Citations by publishers

5
10
15
20
25
Elsevier
22 publications, 30.99%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
13 publications, 18.31%
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
12 publications, 16.9%
Wiley
6 publications, 8.45%
Springer Nature
5 publications, 7.04%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
3 publications, 4.23%
IEEE
3 publications, 4.23%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 1.41%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1 publication, 1.41%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 1.41%
The Electrochemical Society
1 publication, 1.41%
5
10
15
20
25
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Cheong Y. H., Ge L., Lisak G. Highly reproducible solid contact ion selective electrodes: Emerging opportunities for potentiometry – A review // Analytica Chimica Acta. 2021. Vol. 1162. p. 338304.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Cheong Y. H., Ge L., Lisak G. Highly reproducible solid contact ion selective electrodes: Emerging opportunities for potentiometry – A review // Analytica Chimica Acta. 2021. Vol. 1162. p. 338304.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338304
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2021.338304
TI - Highly reproducible solid contact ion selective electrodes: Emerging opportunities for potentiometry – A review
T2 - Analytica Chimica Acta
AU - Cheong, Yi Heng
AU - Ge, Liya
AU - Lisak, Grzegorz
PY - 2021
DA - 2021/06/01 00:00:00
PB - Elsevier
SP - 338304
VL - 1162
SN - 0003-2670
SN - 1873-4324
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2021_Cheong,
author = {Yi Heng Cheong and Liya Ge and Grzegorz Lisak},
title = {Highly reproducible solid contact ion selective electrodes: Emerging opportunities for potentiometry – A review},
journal = {Analytica Chimica Acta},
year = {2021},
volume = {1162},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {jun},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2021.338304},
pages = {338304},
doi = {10.1016/j.aca.2021.338304}
}
Found error?