volume 259 issue Pt B pages 319-326

Emergence of catalytic bioscavengers against organophosphorus agents

P. Masson 1
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2016-11-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.120
CiteScore8.6
Impact factor5.4
ISSN00092797, 18727786
General Medicine
Toxicology
Abstract
Bioscavengers are an effective alternative approach for pre- and post-exposure treatments of nerve agent (NA) poisoning. Bioscavengers are natural or recombinant enzymes, reactive proteins, and antibodies that neutralize NAs before they reach their physiological targets. They are administered by injection (protein or gene delivery vector) and react with NAs in the bloodstream. Other ways of delivery can be used: inhalation for pulmonary delivery, topical creams for skin protection, etc. Operational bioscavengers must be producible at low cost, not susceptible to induce immune response and adverse effects, and stable in the bloodstream, upon storage, and under field conditions. First generation bioscavengers, cholinesterases and carboxylesterases, are stoichiometric bioscavengers. However, stoichiometric neutralization of NAs needs administration of huge doses of costly biopharmaceuticals. Second generation bioscavengers are catalytic bioscavengers. These are capable of detoxifying organophosphates regeneratively. By virtue of high turnover, much lower doses are needed for rapid neutralization of toxicants. The most promising catalytic bioscavengers are evolved mutants of phosphotriesterases (bacterial enzymes, mammalian paraoxonases), displaying enantiomeric preference for toxic NA isomers. However, engineering of cholinesterases, carboxylesterases, prolidases and other enzymes, e.g. phosphotriesterases-lactonases from extremophiles is of interest. In particular, association of cholinesterase mutants (not susceptible to age after phosphylation) with fast-reactivating oximes leads to pseudocatalytic bioscavengers. Thus, catalytic and pseudocatalytic bioscavengers are an improvement of bioscavenger-based medical countermeasures in terms of efficacy and cost.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
Chemico-Biological Interactions
5 publications, 10.64%
Toxicology
3 publications, 6.38%
Russian Chemical Bulletin
2 publications, 4.26%
Annales Pharmaceutiques Francaises
2 publications, 4.26%
Environmental Research
2 publications, 4.26%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
2 publications, 4.26%
Frontiers in Pharmacology
1 publication, 2.13%
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry B
1 publication, 2.13%
BMC Biotechnology
1 publication, 2.13%
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
1 publication, 2.13%
Toxicology Letters
1 publication, 2.13%
Protein Expression and Purification
1 publication, 2.13%
Current Opinion in Physiology
1 publication, 2.13%
Journal of Neurochemistry
1 publication, 2.13%
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 2.13%
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
1 publication, 2.13%
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
1 publication, 2.13%
Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology
1 publication, 2.13%
Journal of Toxicology
1 publication, 2.13%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
1 publication, 2.13%
Methods in Enzymology
1 publication, 2.13%
Acta Naturae
1 publication, 2.13%
Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology
1 publication, 2.13%
Bioorganic Chemistry
1 publication, 2.13%
Toxicology Research
1 publication, 2.13%
Molecular Physics
1 publication, 2.13%
Российский физиологический журнал им  И  М  Сеченова
1 publication, 2.13%
Russian Chemical Reviews
1 publication, 2.13%
Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology
1 publication, 2.13%
1
2
3
4
5

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
Elsevier
24 publications, 51.06%
Springer Nature
5 publications, 10.64%
Wiley
4 publications, 8.51%
Pleiades Publishing
2 publications, 4.26%
MDPI
2 publications, 4.26%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 2.13%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1 publication, 2.13%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 publication, 2.13%
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 2.13%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 publication, 2.13%
Acta Naturae Ltd
1 publication, 2.13%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 2.13%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 2.13%
Akademizdatcenter Nauka
1 publication, 2.13%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 2.13%
5
10
15
20
25
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
47
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Masson P., Lushchekina S. Emergence of catalytic bioscavengers against organophosphorus agents // Chemico-Biological Interactions. 2016. Vol. 259. No. Pt B. pp. 319-326.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Masson P., Lushchekina S. Emergence of catalytic bioscavengers against organophosphorus agents // Chemico-Biological Interactions. 2016. Vol. 259. No. Pt B. pp. 319-326.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.cbi.2016.02.010
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2016.02.010
TI - Emergence of catalytic bioscavengers against organophosphorus agents
T2 - Chemico-Biological Interactions
AU - Masson, P.
AU - Lushchekina, S.
PY - 2016
DA - 2016/11/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 319-326
IS - Pt B
VL - 259
PMID - 26899146
SN - 0009-2797
SN - 1872-7786
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2016_Masson,
author = {P. Masson and S. Lushchekina},
title = {Emergence of catalytic bioscavengers against organophosphorus agents},
journal = {Chemico-Biological Interactions},
year = {2016},
volume = {259},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2016.02.010},
number = {Pt B},
pages = {319--326},
doi = {10.1016/j.cbi.2016.02.010}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Masson, P., and S. Lushchekina. “Emergence of catalytic bioscavengers against organophosphorus agents.” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 259, no. Pt B, Nov. 2016, pp. 319-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2016.02.010.