volume 187 pages 516-528

Comparison of new two-step calcium carbide production process and traditional production process using numerical simulation of heat transfer and chemical reaction

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-11-01
scimago Q2
wos Q2
SJR0.728
CiteScore6.5
Impact factor3.9
ISSN02638762, 17443563
General Chemistry
General Chemical Engineering
Abstract
The traditional calcium carbide (CaC 2 ) production process (TCCPP) uses block CaC 2 and coke as the main raw materials and produces CaC 2 through electrothermal smelting in an arc furnace. The new two-step CaC 2 production process (NTCCPP) uses hot pellets of calcium oxide powder and pulverized coal after pelletizing and pyrolysis as raw materials in the arc furnace to replace the block calcium oxide and coke to produce CaC 2 . In this study, the single-particle heat transfer and reaction models of TCCPP and NTCCPP were established. The reactions of the two processes under the same production conditions were numerically simulated, and the strengthening mechanism of NTCCPP was explored. The result showed that after the same time period, the mass of CaC 2 in the traditional CaC 2 raw material was lower than that in the pellet raw material of the new process. A higher initial temperature (973 K) can shorten the heating time required for the pellet to reach the reaction temperature and the CaC 2 average mass fraction of the pellet with a higher initial temperature was higher than cold pellet in the same reaction time. These findings provide a reference for improving the design and operation of the NTCCPP. • Compared traditional (TCCPP) with two-step CaC 2 production (NTCCPP). • CaC 2 mass in the raw material was lower for TCCPP than for NTCCPP. • A high initial temperature, a higher CaC 2 mass in pellet. • NTCCPP saves significant energy compared to TCCPP.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
Green Chemistry
1 publication, 33.33%
Energy
1 publication, 33.33%
Science China Technological Sciences
1 publication, 33.33%
1

Publishers

1
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 publication, 33.33%
Elsevier
1 publication, 33.33%
Springer Nature
1 publication, 33.33%
1
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
4
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
You X. et al. Comparison of new two-step calcium carbide production process and traditional production process using numerical simulation of heat transfer and chemical reaction // Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2022. Vol. 187. pp. 516-528.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
You X. Comparison of new two-step calcium carbide production process and traditional production process using numerical simulation of heat transfer and chemical reaction // Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2022. Vol. 187. pp. 516-528.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.cherd.2022.08.056
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2022.08.056
TI - Comparison of new two-step calcium carbide production process and traditional production process using numerical simulation of heat transfer and chemical reaction
T2 - Chemical Engineering Research and Design
AU - You, Xin
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/11/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 516-528
VL - 187
SN - 0263-8762
SN - 1744-3563
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_You,
author = {Xin You},
title = {Comparison of new two-step calcium carbide production process and traditional production process using numerical simulation of heat transfer and chemical reaction},
journal = {Chemical Engineering Research and Design},
year = {2022},
volume = {187},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2022.08.056},
pages = {516--528},
doi = {10.1016/j.cherd.2022.08.056}
}