Comparing Methods for the Estimation of CO2 Storage Capacity in Saline Aquifers in Germany: Regional Aquifer Based vs. Structural Trap Based Assessments
Тип публикации: Journal Article
Дата публикации: 2017-07-01
General Medicine
Краткое описание
Estimates of CO 2 storage capacity are often based on regional aquifer assessments. In Germany however, capacity estimations have been based on the assessment of individual traps also. For method comparison, a new nationwide capacity assessment was performed, using the ‘regional aquifer based’ method. This assessment yields a capacity of 20.4 – 115.3 Gt, which is higher than earlier ‘trap based’ estimates. Results for the Middle Buntsandstein in the North German Basin yield 6.6 – 41.8 Gt for the regional- and 4.8 – 9.7 Gt of storage capacity for the trap based method, with a less distinct range of uncertainty for the latter.
Найдено
Ничего не найдено, попробуйте изменить настройки фильтра.
Для доступа к списку цитирований публикации необходимо авторизоваться.
Топ-30
Журналы
|
1
2
3
4
|
|
|
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
4 публикации, 20%
|
|
|
Earth's Future
3 публикации, 15%
|
|
|
Environmental Earth Sciences
2 публикации, 10%
|
|
|
Petroleum Geoscience
1 публикация, 5%
|
|
|
Minerals
1 публикация, 5%
|
|
|
Clean Technologies
1 публикация, 5%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Climate
1 публикация, 5%
|
|
|
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
1 публикация, 5%
|
|
|
Energy Advances
1 публикация, 5%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Energy Research
1 публикация, 5%
|
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
1 публикация, 5%
|
|
|
Energy Technology
1 публикация, 5%
|
|
|
RSC Sustainability
1 публикация, 5%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
|
Издатели
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
|
|
Elsevier
6 публикаций, 30%
|
|
|
Wiley
3 публикации, 15%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
3 публикации, 15%
|
|
|
MDPI
2 публикации, 10%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
2 публикации, 10%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 публикации, 10%
|
|
|
Geological Society of London
1 публикация, 5%
|
|
|
American Geophysical Union
1 публикация, 5%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
- Мы не учитываем публикации, у которых нет DOI.
- Статистика публикаций обновляется еженедельно.
Вы ученый?
Создайте профиль, чтобы получать персональные рекомендации коллег, конференций и новых статей.
Метрики
20
Всего цитирований:
20
Цитирований c 2025:
3
(15%)
Цитировать
ГОСТ |
RIS |
BibTex
Цитировать
ГОСТ
Скопировать
Knopf S., May F. Comparing Methods for the Estimation of CO2 Storage Capacity in Saline Aquifers in Germany: Regional Aquifer Based vs. Structural Trap Based Assessments // Energy Procedia. 2017. Vol. 114. pp. 4710-4721.
ГОСТ со всеми авторами (до 50)
Скопировать
Knopf S., May F. Comparing Methods for the Estimation of CO2 Storage Capacity in Saline Aquifers in Germany: Regional Aquifer Based vs. Structural Trap Based Assessments // Energy Procedia. 2017. Vol. 114. pp. 4710-4721.
Цитировать
RIS
Скопировать
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1605
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1605
TI - Comparing Methods for the Estimation of CO2 Storage Capacity in Saline Aquifers in Germany: Regional Aquifer Based vs. Structural Trap Based Assessments
T2 - Energy Procedia
AU - Knopf, S
AU - May, F.
PY - 2017
DA - 2017/07/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 4710-4721
VL - 114
SN - 1876-6102
ER -
Цитировать
BibTex (до 50 авторов)
Скопировать
@article{2017_Knopf,
author = {S Knopf and F. May},
title = {Comparing Methods for the Estimation of CO2 Storage Capacity in Saline Aquifers in Germany: Regional Aquifer Based vs. Structural Trap Based Assessments},
journal = {Energy Procedia},
year = {2017},
volume = {114},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {jul},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1605},
pages = {4710--4721},
doi = {10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1605}
}
Ошибка в публикации?