Evaluation of bio-refinery alternatives to produce sustainable aviation fuels in a sugarcane mill
Abid H Tanzil
1
,
Kristin L Brandt
2
,
Zhigang Xiao
3
,
M.P. Wolcott
2
,
Electo Eduardo Silva Lora
4
,
Claudio Stockle
1
,
Manuel Garcia Perez
1, 5
1
5
Bioproducts Sciences and Engineering Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2022-08-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 1.614
CiteScore: 14.2
Impact factor: 7.5
ISSN: 00162361, 18737153
Organic Chemistry
General Chemical Engineering
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Fuel Technology
Abstract
• Twenty biorefinery concepts for the production of Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAFs) in a 12,444 MT sugarcane mill were studied. • Five SAF technologies were analyzed. • Fourteen out of fifteen scenarios resulted in capital reductions (5 to 86%). • We identified MFSPs reductions between 8 and 53%. • Twelve scenarios yielded GHG savings from 10 to 100%. A large sugarcane mill with a processing capacity of 12,444 metric ton sugarcane per day is used as a host plant for the evaluation of several bio-refinery concepts to produce sustainable aviation fuels (SAF). Five SAF technologies are studied: Virent’s BioForming, alcohol to jet, direct sugar to hydrocarbon, fast pyrolysis-bio-oil hydrotreatment, and gasification & Fischer-Tropsch technologies. A standardized methodology is followed to evaluate twenty integrated scenarios to produce fuels using sugarcane mill facilities. In our analyses we assumed that the sugarcane mill operates 6 months but that the SAF unit operates twelve months (with switchgrass, molasses, and ethanol purchases). For each of the scenarios, the minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) within the integrated scenarios are estimated. Fourteen out of fifteen integrated scenarios resulted in reductions of capital (5 to 86 %) and operational costs (4 to 34 %) compared with the base case processes. These benefits are associated with a better use of sugarcane mill’s infrastructure, co-products availability (molasses and ethanol) as well as waste stream feedstocks (surplus bagasse). It was possible to identify conditions reducing MFSPs between 8 and 53 % from corresponding base cases. Twelve scenarios yielded GHG savings from 10% to 97%.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
|
|
|
Fuel
3 publications, 12.5%
|
|
|
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
3 publications, 12.5%
|
|
|
Energy Conversion and Management
2 publications, 8.33%
|
|
|
Energies
2 publications, 8.33%
|
|
|
Bioresource Technology
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
iScience
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
Bioresource Technology Reports
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
Fuel Processing Technology
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
Energy & Fuels
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
Clean Energy Production Technologies
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
Sustainable Energy and Fuels
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
Energy Conversion and Management: X
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
Applied Energy
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
Applied Thermal Engineering
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
Russian Chemical Reviews
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
1
2
3
|
Publishers
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
|
|
Elsevier
17 publications, 70.83%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
2 publications, 8.33%
|
|
|
MDPI
2 publications, 8.33%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 4.17%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
24
Total citations:
24
Citations from 2024:
13
(54.17%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Tanzil A. H. et al. Evaluation of bio-refinery alternatives to produce sustainable aviation fuels in a sugarcane mill // Fuel. 2022. Vol. 321. p. 123992.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Tanzil A. H., Brandt K. L., Xiao Z., Wolcott M., Silva Lora E. E., Stockle C., Garcia Perez M. Evaluation of bio-refinery alternatives to produce sustainable aviation fuels in a sugarcane mill // Fuel. 2022. Vol. 321. p. 123992.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123992
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123992
TI - Evaluation of bio-refinery alternatives to produce sustainable aviation fuels in a sugarcane mill
T2 - Fuel
AU - Tanzil, Abid H
AU - Brandt, Kristin L
AU - Xiao, Zhigang
AU - Wolcott, M.P.
AU - Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo
AU - Stockle, Claudio
AU - Garcia Perez, Manuel
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/08/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 123992
VL - 321
SN - 0016-2361
SN - 1873-7153
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2022_Tanzil,
author = {Abid H Tanzil and Kristin L Brandt and Zhigang Xiao and M.P. Wolcott and Electo Eduardo Silva Lora and Claudio Stockle and Manuel Garcia Perez},
title = {Evaluation of bio-refinery alternatives to produce sustainable aviation fuels in a sugarcane mill},
journal = {Fuel},
year = {2022},
volume = {321},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {aug},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123992},
pages = {123992},
doi = {10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123992}
}
Profiles