Open Access
Health Professions Education, volume 6, issue 4, pages 574-580
Co-Development and Innovation in Global Health: A Case Study of Educational Change
Rachel A. Locke
1
,
Colin Coles
1
,
Gwyneth Grout
2
,
Rosie M Lusznat
1
,
Jo Overton
3
,
Mark S. Roberts
1
1
Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Winchester, Sparkford Road, Winchester, Hampshire, SO22 4NR, UK
|
2
Independent Consultant Nurse
3
Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Tatchbury Mount Calmore, Southampton, SO40 2RZ, UK
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2020-12-01
Journal:
Health Professions Education
scimago Q2
SJR: 0.407
CiteScore: 3.6
Impact factor: —
ISSN: 24523011
General Medicine
Abstract
Ten years ago, Ghana’s mental health services were severely lacking, accelerated through ‘brain drain’ as trained psychiatrists and mental health nurses left the country to work overseas. A group of UK global health workers was closely involved in a ten-year large-scale innovation aimed at helping to improve mental health services in Ghana at community level. A new generation of mental health workers in Ghana was created adding hundreds of practitioners to the workforce, meaning that thousands of Ghanaians would potentially receive support. The research reported here explored the UK group’s involvement to identify significant lessons learnt. Method An ‘ideological narrative’ was obtained through engaging the research participants in insider practitioner research. They were supported in this process by a university-based researcher, who offered an ‘outsider’ perspective. This novel type of narrative meant participants could not only give account of their own practice and an awareness of their own learning, but also become more aware of the significance of the often unstated, and possibly unconscious, values informing their stories. Results The lessons learnt by the UK global health workers from involvement in this innovation are explored within five themes: Curriculum development as an ongoing process; ‘we are all learning’ and the notion of ‘co-development’; timescales and the importance of culture; the interconnected nature of practice; and education as development. Conclusion This research is intended to help shape individual and group efforts that are involved in global health projects generally through project participants articulating the significant lessons learnt about educational change and the nature of development associated with such projects as ongoing ‘co-development’. It also has the potential to contribute to a wider dialogue with curriculum developers, educators, and others involved in practice innovation, all of which inevitably involve others and are never ended.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.