volume 59 pages 242-256

Perspective on ultramicroporous carbon as sulphur host for Li–S batteries

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2021-08-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR3.394
CiteScore27.1
Impact factor14.9
ISSN20954956, 2096885X
Electrochemistry
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Fuel Technology
Energy (miscellaneous)
Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive insight into the state of sulphur infused in ultramicroporous carbon (UMC), its electrochemical reaction mechanism with Li, and clarifies the role of SEI on the reactivity of UMC-S composites. Lithium–sulphur (Li–S) batteries are currently considered as next-generation battery technology. Sulphur is an attractive positive electrode for lithium metal batteries, mainly due to its high capacity (1675 mAh g −1 ) and high specific energy (2600 Wh kg −1 ). The electrochemical reaction of lithium with sulphur in non-aqueous electrolytes results in the formation of electrolyte soluble intermediate lithium–polysulphides. The dissolved polysulphides shuttle to the anode and get reduced at the anode resulting in Li metal corrosion. The solubility of polysulphide gradually reduces the amount of sulphur in the cathode, thereby limiting the cycle life of Li–S batteries. Several strategies have been proposed to improve the cycling stability of Li–S batteries. A unique approach to eliminate the polysulphide shuttle is to use ultramicroporous carbon (UMC) as a host for sulphur. The pore size of UMC which is below 7 Å, is the bottleneck for carbonate solvents to access sulphur/polysulphides confined in the pores, thereby preventing the polysulphide dissolution. This perspective article will emphasise the role of UMC host in directing the lithiation mechanism of sulphur and in inhibiting polysulphide dissolution, including the resulting parasitic reaction on the lithium anode. Further, the challenges that need to be addressed by UMC-S based Li–S batteries, and the strategies to realise high power density, high Coulombic efficiency, and resilient Li–S batteries will be discussed.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
Journal of Energy Chemistry
5 publications, 8.77%
Advanced Energy Materials
4 publications, 7.02%
Energy Storage Materials
3 publications, 5.26%
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
3 publications, 5.26%
Journal of Energy Storage
3 publications, 5.26%
Electrochimica Acta
2 publications, 3.51%
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
2 publications, 3.51%
Nanoscale Advances
2 publications, 3.51%
Communications Chemistry
1 publication, 1.75%
2D Materials
1 publication, 1.75%
Science China Technological Sciences
1 publication, 1.75%
Food Chemistry
1 publication, 1.75%
Applied Surface Science
1 publication, 1.75%
Materials Today Energy
1 publication, 1.75%
Journal of Power Sources
1 publication, 1.75%
Chemical Engineering Journal
1 publication, 1.75%
Materials Today Sustainability
1 publication, 1.75%
Nanotechnology
1 publication, 1.75%
Small Methods
1 publication, 1.75%
Angewandte Chemie
1 publication, 1.75%
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
1 publication, 1.75%
Batteries & Supercaps
1 publication, 1.75%
ChemElectroChem
1 publication, 1.75%
Energy & Fuels
1 publication, 1.75%
Small
1 publication, 1.75%
Dalton Transactions
1 publication, 1.75%
Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers
1 publication, 1.75%
ChemPhysChem
1 publication, 1.75%
Nano-Micro Letters
1 publication, 1.75%
1
2
3
4
5

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
Elsevier
26 publications, 45.61%
Wiley
11 publications, 19.3%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
9 publications, 15.79%
Springer Nature
4 publications, 7.02%
IOP Publishing
2 publications, 3.51%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2 publications, 3.51%
OOO Zhurnal "Mendeleevskie Soobshcheniya"
1 publication, 1.75%
MDPI
1 publication, 1.75%
5
10
15
20
25
30
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
57
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Maria Joseph H., Fichtner M., Munnangi A. R. Perspective on ultramicroporous carbon as sulphur host for Li–S batteries // Journal of Energy Chemistry. 2021. Vol. 59. pp. 242-256.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Maria Joseph H., Fichtner M., Munnangi A. R. Perspective on ultramicroporous carbon as sulphur host for Li–S batteries // Journal of Energy Chemistry. 2021. Vol. 59. pp. 242-256.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.11.001
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.11.001
TI - Perspective on ultramicroporous carbon as sulphur host for Li–S batteries
T2 - Journal of Energy Chemistry
AU - Maria Joseph, Helen
AU - Fichtner, Maximilian
AU - Munnangi, Anji Reddy
PY - 2021
DA - 2021/08/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 242-256
VL - 59
SN - 2095-4956
SN - 2096-885X
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2021_Maria Joseph,
author = {Helen Maria Joseph and Maximilian Fichtner and Anji Reddy Munnangi},
title = {Perspective on ultramicroporous carbon as sulphur host for Li–S batteries},
journal = {Journal of Energy Chemistry},
year = {2021},
volume = {59},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {aug},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.11.001},
pages = {242--256},
doi = {10.1016/j.jechem.2020.11.001}
}