Journal of Materials Processing Technology, volume 234, pages 332-341

An improved fused deposition modeling process for forming large-size thin-walled parts

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2016-08-01
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q2
Impact factor6.3
ISSN09240136, 18734774
Metals and Alloys
Ceramics and Composites
Computer Science Applications
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Modeling and Simulation
Abstract
Aiming at the problem of severe warping, deformation and crack during the fabrication of large-size thin-walled parts, an improved fused deposition modeling process with laser-assisted heating was put forward to improve the forming quality and shape accuracy. The numerical model of the improved FDM process was established to analyze the thermal field and three-dimensional (3D) solidified morphology during the forming process. The dependency relationship among the forming temperature, shear rate and the thermo-physical properties of forming material, such as viscosity and surface tension, were considered in the model. The numerical model was verified by experiments from two aspects: the temperature information and the solidified morphology. The effects of forming speed, laser power and the ways of laser heating on the surface temperature distribution and viscosity of the forming material were investigated. Incremental forming experiments of ABS thin-walled parts was carried out under several laser irradiation conditions and forming speeds using the improved process. The results show that the lateral laser-assisted heating has more obvious effect in increasing the temperature of the local forming regions than the pre- and post-laser-assisted heating. Tensile strength of test unit had a maximum increase of 195% when the lateral laser-assisted heating was employed. Meanwhile, the shape accuracy of the fabricated thin-walled parts can be improved obviously, and the effective bonding width between layers was about 24% larger than that without laser-assisted heating.

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Additive Manufacturing
15 publications, 18.29%
Polymers
6 publications, 7.32%
Rapid Prototyping Journal
4 publications, 4.88%
Materials
4 publications, 4.88%
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
4 publications, 4.88%
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
4 publications, 4.88%
Composites Science and Technology
2 publications, 2.44%
Materials and Design
2 publications, 2.44%
Composites Part B: Engineering
2 publications, 2.44%
Thin-Walled Structures
2 publications, 2.44%
Advanced Engineering Materials
2 publications, 2.44%
AIP Conference Proceedings
2 publications, 2.44%
Journal of Rheology
1 publication, 1.22%
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D
1 publication, 1.22%
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
1 publication, 1.22%
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture
1 publication, 1.22%
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
1 publication, 1.22%
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
1 publication, 1.22%
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing
1 publication, 1.22%
Results in Engineering
1 publication, 1.22%
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
1 publication, 1.22%
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
1 publication, 1.22%
Procedia CIRP
1 publication, 1.22%
Progress in Materials Science
1 publication, 1.22%
Materials Today: Proceedings
1 publication, 1.22%
Materials Letters
1 publication, 1.22%
Polymers for Advanced Technologies
1 publication, 1.22%
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
1 publication, 1.22%
International Journal of Solids and Structures
1 publication, 1.22%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Elsevier
37 publications, 45.12%
MDPI
11 publications, 13.41%
Springer Nature
6 publications, 7.32%
Wiley
5 publications, 6.1%
Emerald
4 publications, 4.88%
SAGE
2 publications, 2.44%
Taylor & Francis
2 publications, 2.44%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2 publications, 2.44%
AIP Publishing
2 publications, 2.44%
Society of Rheology
1 publication, 1.22%
Mary Ann Liebert
1 publication, 1.22%
Scientific Research Publishing
1 publication, 1.22%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1 publication, 1.22%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 1.22%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Du J. et al. An improved fused deposition modeling process for forming large-size thin-walled parts // Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2016. Vol. 234. pp. 332-341.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Du J., Wei Z., Wang X., Wang J., Chen Z. An improved fused deposition modeling process for forming large-size thin-walled parts // Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2016. Vol. 234. pp. 332-341.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.005
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.005
TI - An improved fused deposition modeling process for forming large-size thin-walled parts
T2 - Journal of Materials Processing Technology
AU - Du, Jun
AU - Wei, ZhengYing
AU - Wang, Xin
AU - Wang, Jijie
AU - Chen, Zhen
PY - 2016
DA - 2016/08/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 332-341
VL - 234
SN - 0924-0136
SN - 1873-4774
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2016_Du,
author = {Jun Du and ZhengYing Wei and Xin Wang and Jijie Wang and Zhen Chen},
title = {An improved fused deposition modeling process for forming large-size thin-walled parts},
journal = {Journal of Materials Processing Technology},
year = {2016},
volume = {234},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {aug},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.005},
pages = {332--341},
doi = {10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.005}
}
Found error?