Journal of Materials Processing Technology, volume 271, pages 62-74

Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2019-09-01
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q2
Impact factor6.3
ISSN09240136, 18734774
Metals and Alloys
Ceramics and Composites
Computer Science Applications
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Modeling and Simulation
Abstract
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is an engineering thermoplastic with good biocompatibility and excellent mechanical properties. More importantly, PEEK is a promising biomaterial that could potentially be used to replace traditional metal or ceramic parts for biomedical and aerospace applications. Compared to other processing technologies for manufacturing PEEK parts, fused deposition modeling (FDM) has numerous advantages for forming functional parts of complex structures. However, a number of challenges still exist in successfully realizing FDM of PEEK owing to its high melting temperature and high viscosity. In this paper, the FDM method was applied to achieve 3D printing of PEEK. For the first time, finite element analysis (FEA) was used to simulate the melting conditions and fluidity of PEEK in a flow channel, in order to determine the parameters required to 3D print PEEK parts with sufficient surface quality and improved mechanical properties. The simulation results were further analyzed to instruct the design of future printing systems and optimize the printing parameters. In addition, several FDM experiments were performed to study the effects of various printing parameters, including the printing temperature, printing speed, and printing layer thickness, on the mechanical properties, microstructure, and surface quality of printed PEEK parts. The results suggest that using a higher heating temperature of 440 °C, a printing speed of 20 mm/s, and a small printing layer thickness of 0.1 mm can improve the density of PEEK parts, reduce internal defects, strengthen binding between 3D printed layers and infill filaments, and reduce surface roughness. All of these efforts will contribute to the development of improved 3D printing technologies for PEEK.

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
Polymers
20 publications, 7.04%
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
12 publications, 4.23%
Additive Manufacturing
11 publications, 3.87%
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
10 publications, 3.52%
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
9 publications, 3.17%
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
9 publications, 3.17%
Materials
8 publications, 2.82%
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
8 publications, 2.82%
Polymer Composites
6 publications, 2.11%
Composites Part B: Engineering
6 publications, 2.11%
Journal of Materials Science
5 publications, 1.76%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
4 publications, 1.41%
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing
4 publications, 1.41%
Composite Structures
4 publications, 1.41%
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
4 publications, 1.41%
Polymer Engineering and Science
4 publications, 1.41%
Rapid Prototyping Journal
3 publications, 1.06%
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
3 publications, 1.06%
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
3 publications, 1.06%
Composites Science and Technology
3 publications, 1.06%
Procedia Structural Integrity
3 publications, 1.06%
Materials Today: Proceedings
3 publications, 1.06%
Polymer Testing
3 publications, 1.06%
Heliyon
3 publications, 1.06%
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering
3 publications, 1.06%
Materials Today Communications
3 publications, 1.06%
ACS applied materials & interfaces
2 publications, 0.7%
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering
2 publications, 0.7%
High Performance Polymers
2 publications, 0.7%
5
10
15
20

Publishers

20
40
60
80
100
120
Elsevier
102 publications, 35.92%
Springer Nature
50 publications, 17.61%
MDPI
48 publications, 16.9%
Wiley
30 publications, 10.56%
SAGE
12 publications, 4.23%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
5 publications, 1.76%
Taylor & Francis
4 publications, 1.41%
Emerald
3 publications, 1.06%
Mary Ann Liebert
3 publications, 1.06%
IOP Publishing
3 publications, 1.06%
Walter de Gruyter
3 publications, 1.06%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 publications, 0.7%
Trans Tech Publications
2 publications, 0.7%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
2 publications, 0.7%
American Society for Testing and Materials
1 publication, 0.35%
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
1 publication, 0.35%
ifmbe proceedings
1 publication, 0.35%
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
1 publication, 0.35%
IntechOpen
1 publication, 0.35%
EDP Sciences
1 publication, 0.35%
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 0.35%
Sakarya University Journal of Science
1 publication, 0.35%
OAE Publishing Inc.
1 publication, 0.35%
Akademiai Kiado
1 publication, 0.35%
20
40
60
80
100
120
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Wang P. et al. Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK // Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2019. Vol. 271. pp. 62-74.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Wang P., Zou B., Xiao H., Ding S., Huang C. Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK // Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2019. Vol. 271. pp. 62-74.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.016
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.016
TI - Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK
T2 - Journal of Materials Processing Technology
AU - Wang, Peng
AU - Zou, Bin
AU - Xiao, Hongchuan
AU - Ding, Shouling
AU - Huang, Chuan
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/09/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 62-74
VL - 271
SN - 0924-0136
SN - 1873-4774
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2019_Wang,
author = {Peng Wang and Bin Zou and Hongchuan Xiao and Shouling Ding and Chuan Huang},
title = {Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK},
journal = {Journal of Materials Processing Technology},
year = {2019},
volume = {271},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.016},
pages = {62--74},
doi = {10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.016}
}
Found error?