Open Access
Polymer Testing, volume 69, pages 157-166
FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review
1
University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, Department of Machine and Manufacturing Systems, Splaiul Independentei, 313, Sector 6, Bucharest, Romania
|
2
University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, Department of Materials Technology and Welding, Splaiul Independentei, 313, Sector 6, Bucharest, Romania
|
3
University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, Department of Strength Materials, Splaiul Independentei, 313, Sector 6, Bucharest, Romania
|
4
Colentina Clinical Hospital Bucharest, Department of Orthopedics II, Sos. Stefan cel Mare, 19-21, Sector 2, Bucharest, Romania
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2018-08-01
Organic Chemistry
Polymers and Plastics
Abstract
Designing and manufacturing functional parts for fields such as engineering and medicine is a major goal of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). These activities should be supported by knowledge on how different settings of process parameters impact the mechanical behavior of the products. However, obtaining this information is a quite complex task given the large variety of possible combinations of materials-3D printers-slicing software-process parameters. Thus, the importance of reviewing the current research on this topic for identifying practical and useful aspects, key process parameters and limitations, but also for understanding to what extent the results of these researches are relevant and can be applied in further studies and real applications. A systematic literature search was performed based on classification according to the type of 3D printing polymer. The most significant process parameters considered as influencing FDM specimens' tensile, compression, flexural or impact strengths are discussed considering the results presented in the literature. A necessary distinction between the mechanical properties of material and testing specimens (as given by producers and by experiments) and the mechanical behavior of a FDM end-part is also made.
Top-30
Journals
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Polymers
60 publications, 8.85%
|
|
Additive Manufacturing
34 publications, 5.01%
|
|
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
29 publications, 4.28%
|
|
Materials
26 publications, 3.83%
|
|
Rapid Prototyping Journal
25 publications, 3.69%
|
|
Materials Today: Proceedings
21 publications, 3.1%
|
|
Polymer Testing
16 publications, 2.36%
|
|
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
11 publications, 1.62%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering
11 publications, 1.62%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
9 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Polymer Composites
8 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Journal of Composites Science
8 publications, 1.18%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
8 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
7 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Advanced Engineering Materials
7 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Virtual and Physical Prototyping
7 publications, 1.03%
|
|
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
6 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
6 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Materials Today Communications
6 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
6 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Polymer
6 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
6 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
5 publications, 0.74%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
5 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
5 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies
5 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Micromachines
4 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
4 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials
4 publications, 0.59%
|
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishers
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
|
Elsevier
195 publications, 28.76%
|
|
MDPI
135 publications, 19.91%
|
|
Springer Nature
110 publications, 16.22%
|
|
Wiley
43 publications, 6.34%
|
|
SAGE
27 publications, 3.98%
|
|
Emerald
27 publications, 3.98%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
24 publications, 3.54%
|
|
IOP Publishing
22 publications, 3.24%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
10 publications, 1.47%
|
|
AIP Publishing
9 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
7 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
6 publications, 0.88%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
5 publications, 0.74%
|
|
EDP Sciences
4 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
3 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
3 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
3 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
2 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Oxford University Press
2 publications, 0.29%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
2 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
2 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
2 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
2 publications, 0.29%
|
|
ASME International
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
World Scientific
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
The Korean Society of Precision Engineering
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Popescu D. et al. FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review // Polymer Testing. 2018. Vol. 69. pp. 157-166.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Popescu D., Zapciu A., Amza C. G., Baciu F., Marinescu R. FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review // Polymer Testing. 2018. Vol. 69. pp. 157-166.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020
TI - FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review
T2 - Polymer Testing
AU - Popescu, Diana
AU - Zapciu, Aurelian
AU - Amza, Cătălin Gheorghe
AU - Baciu, Florin
AU - Marinescu, Rodica
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/08/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 157-166
VL - 69
SN - 0142-9418
ER -
Cite this
BibTex
Copy
@article{2018_Popescu,
author = {Diana Popescu and Aurelian Zapciu and Cătălin Gheorghe Amza and Florin Baciu and Rodica Marinescu},
title = {FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review},
journal = {Polymer Testing},
year = {2018},
volume = {69},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {aug},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020},
pages = {157--166},
doi = {10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020}
}