pages 1-8

Is ‘orthodox panentheism’ unorthodox? A response to James Dominic Rooney

Jeremiah Carey 1
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-11-04
scimago Q1
SJR0.475
CiteScore1.4
Impact factor0.7
ISSN00344125, 1469901X
Abstract

James Dominic argues in response to a previous article by me that the view according to which God is the formal cause of creatures is unorthodox and ultimately incoherent. This is because it involves either making God a part of creatures, or dividing God into finite parts, both of which, he claims, lead to contradictions with traditional Christian claims. However, Rooney both misunderstands central parts of my presentation, and fails to make his case.

Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
0
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Carey J. Is ‘orthodox panentheism’ unorthodox? A response to James Dominic Rooney // Religious Studies. 2024. pp. 1-8.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Carey J. Is ‘orthodox panentheism’ unorthodox? A response to James Dominic Rooney // Religious Studies. 2024. pp. 1-8.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1017/s0034412524000349
UR - https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0034412524000349/type/journal_article
TI - Is ‘orthodox panentheism’ unorthodox? A response to James Dominic Rooney
T2 - Religious Studies
AU - Carey, Jeremiah
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/11/04
PB - Cambridge University Press
SP - 1-8
SN - 0034-4125
SN - 1469-901X
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2024_Carey,
author = {Jeremiah Carey},
title = {Is ‘orthodox panentheism’ unorthodox? A response to James Dominic Rooney},
journal = {Religious Studies},
year = {2024},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
month = {nov},
url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0034412524000349/type/journal_article},
pages = {1--8},
doi = {10.1017/s0034412524000349}
}