Insecurity and Self-Esteem: Elucidating the Psychological Foundations of Negative Attitudes toward Women
Political scientists recognize discriminatory attitudes as key to understanding a range of political preferences. Sexism is associated with both explicitly and non-explicitly gendered attitudes. But why do certain individuals display discriminatory attitudes, while others do not? Drawing from psychology, we examine the potential power of an underexplored set of personality traits—secure versus fragile self-esteem—in explaining gendered attitudes and preferences. With an online sample of (N = 487) U.S.-based participants, we find that fragile self-esteem is an important trait underlying individuals’ attitudes: individuals who display a discordant view of self—explicitly positive but implicitly negative—are more likely to hold hostile sexist attitudes and prefer men in leadership; these individuals are also more likely to support the Republican Party and former U.S. president Donald Trump. While present in only a fraction of the population, our results suggest that this trait may be important for understanding the development of discriminatory attitudes toward out-groups.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
|
|
|
Political Psychology
1 publication, 25%
|
|
|
Journal of Experimental Political Science
1 publication, 25%
|
|
|
West European Politics
1 publication, 25%
|
|
|
Politics and the Life Sciences
1 publication, 25%
|
|
|
1
|
Publishers
|
1
2
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
2 publications, 50%
|
|
|
Wiley
1 publication, 25%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 25%
|
|
|
1
2
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.