Gender Is Not a Proxy: Race and Intersectionality in Legislative Recruitment
Election to office is shaped by a series of decisions made by prospective candidates, parties, and voters. These choices determine who emerges and is ultimately selected to run, and each decision point either expands or limits the possibilities for more diverse representation. Studies of women candidates have established an important theoretical and empirical basis for understanding legislative recruitment. This study asks how these patterns differ when race and intersectionality are integrated into the analyses. Focusing on more than 800 political aspirants in Canada, I show that although white and racialized women aspire to political office at roughly the same rates, their experiences diverge at the point of party selection. White men remain the preferred candidates, and parties’ efforts to diversify politics have mostly benefited white women. I argue that a greater emphasis on the electoral trajectories of racialized women and men is needed.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
4
|
|
|
Politics & Gender
4 publications, 33.33%
|
|
|
Electoral Studies
2 publications, 16.67%
|
|
|
Nationalities Papers
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
British Journal of Political Science
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
Gender, Work and Organization
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
Political Communication
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
Representation
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
Political Research Quarterly
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
|
Publishers
|
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
5 publications, 41.67%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
3 publications, 25%
|
|
|
Elsevier
2 publications, 16.67%
|
|
|
Wiley
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
SAGE
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.