volume 25 issue 8 pages 2717-2729

Cocrystal Formation Prediction: Hybrid GIN-Mordred Model Outperforms DFT-Based Methods

Mohammad Amin Ghanavati 1, 2
Sohrab Rohani 1, 2, 3, 4
1
 
Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, London, Canada
3
 
Chemical and Biochemical Engineering
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-03-28
scimago Q2
wos Q1
SJR0.633
CiteScore5.6
Impact factor3.4
ISSN15287483, 15287505
Abstract
Cocrystals offer significant potential across various industries, especially pharmaceuticals, by addressing the poor solubility of new drug candidates. However, traditional experimental screening for cocrystal formation is expensive and time-consuming, highlighting the need for predictive models. In this study, we compared four cocrystal prediction approaches: two deep learning (DL) models based on DFT-driven data (PointNet for electrostatic potential (ESP) maps and a novel LSTM for sequential hydrogen bond parameters), a novel hybrid model combining graph isomorphism networks (GIN) with Mordred descriptors, and the empirical Hydrogen Bond Energy (HBE) method. To perform this comparison, we compiled and carried out DFT calculations for 14,790 molecules (7395 pairs of successful and unsuccessful cocrystals). Notably, the GIN-Mordred model outperformed all other methods, achieving the highest balanced accuracy (BACC: 0.916), F1-score (0.956), recall (0.932), and AUC (0.97), with superior segregation performance in distinguishing between cocrystallization outcomes. Importantly, the GIN-Mordred model does not require costly DFT calculations, demonstrating that a combination of graph-based and descriptor-based molecular representation provides an efficient and accurate alternative for cocrystal prediction. This model significantly streamlines the process of tuning the physicochemical properties of crystalline materials for various applications.
Found 
Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
1
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Ghanavati M. A. et al. Cocrystal Formation Prediction: Hybrid GIN-Mordred Model Outperforms DFT-Based Methods // Crystal Growth and Design. 2025. Vol. 25. No. 8. pp. 2717-2729.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Ghanavati M. A., Rohani S. Cocrystal Formation Prediction: Hybrid GIN-Mordred Model Outperforms DFT-Based Methods // Crystal Growth and Design. 2025. Vol. 25. No. 8. pp. 2717-2729.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1021/acs.cgd.5c00347
UR - https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.cgd.5c00347
TI - Cocrystal Formation Prediction: Hybrid GIN-Mordred Model Outperforms DFT-Based Methods
T2 - Crystal Growth and Design
AU - Ghanavati, Mohammad Amin
AU - Rohani, Sohrab
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/03/28
PB - American Chemical Society (ACS)
SP - 2717-2729
IS - 8
VL - 25
SN - 1528-7483
SN - 1528-7505
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2025_Ghanavati,
author = {Mohammad Amin Ghanavati and Sohrab Rohani},
title = {Cocrystal Formation Prediction: Hybrid GIN-Mordred Model Outperforms DFT-Based Methods},
journal = {Crystal Growth and Design},
year = {2025},
volume = {25},
publisher = {American Chemical Society (ACS)},
month = {mar},
url = {https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.cgd.5c00347},
number = {8},
pages = {2717--2729},
doi = {10.1021/acs.cgd.5c00347}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Ghanavati, Mohammad Amin, et al. “Cocrystal Formation Prediction: Hybrid GIN-Mordred Model Outperforms DFT-Based Methods.” Crystal Growth and Design, vol. 25, no. 8, Mar. 2025, pp. 2717-2729. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.cgd.5c00347.