Cocrystal Formation Prediction: Hybrid GIN-Mordred Model Outperforms DFT-Based Methods
1
Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, London, Canada
|
3
Chemical and Biochemical Engineering
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2025-03-28
scimago Q2
wos Q1
SJR: 0.633
CiteScore: 5.6
Impact factor: 3.4
ISSN: 15287483, 15287505
Abstract
Cocrystals offer significant potential across various industries, especially pharmaceuticals, by addressing the poor solubility of new drug candidates. However, traditional experimental screening for cocrystal formation is expensive and time-consuming, highlighting the need for predictive models. In this study, we compared four cocrystal prediction approaches: two deep learning (DL) models based on DFT-driven data (PointNet for electrostatic potential (ESP) maps and a novel LSTM for sequential hydrogen bond parameters), a novel hybrid model combining graph isomorphism networks (GIN) with Mordred descriptors, and the empirical Hydrogen Bond Energy (HBE) method. To perform this comparison, we compiled and carried out DFT calculations for 14,790 molecules (7395 pairs of successful and unsuccessful cocrystals). Notably, the GIN-Mordred model outperformed all other methods, achieving the highest balanced accuracy (BACC: 0.916), F1-score (0.956), recall (0.932), and AUC (0.97), with superior segregation performance in distinguishing between cocrystallization outcomes. Importantly, the GIN-Mordred model does not require costly DFT calculations, demonstrating that a combination of graph-based and descriptor-based molecular representation provides an efficient and accurate alternative for cocrystal prediction. This model significantly streamlines the process of tuning the physicochemical properties of crystalline materials for various applications.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
1
Total citations:
1
Citations from 0:
0
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Ghanavati M. A. et al. Cocrystal Formation Prediction: Hybrid GIN-Mordred Model Outperforms DFT-Based Methods // Crystal Growth and Design. 2025. Vol. 25. No. 8. pp. 2717-2729.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Ghanavati M. A., Rohani S. Cocrystal Formation Prediction: Hybrid GIN-Mordred Model Outperforms DFT-Based Methods // Crystal Growth and Design. 2025. Vol. 25. No. 8. pp. 2717-2729.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1021/acs.cgd.5c00347
UR - https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.cgd.5c00347
TI - Cocrystal Formation Prediction: Hybrid GIN-Mordred Model Outperforms DFT-Based Methods
T2 - Crystal Growth and Design
AU - Ghanavati, Mohammad Amin
AU - Rohani, Sohrab
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/03/28
PB - American Chemical Society (ACS)
SP - 2717-2729
IS - 8
VL - 25
SN - 1528-7483
SN - 1528-7505
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2025_Ghanavati,
author = {Mohammad Amin Ghanavati and Sohrab Rohani},
title = {Cocrystal Formation Prediction: Hybrid GIN-Mordred Model Outperforms DFT-Based Methods},
journal = {Crystal Growth and Design},
year = {2025},
volume = {25},
publisher = {American Chemical Society (ACS)},
month = {mar},
url = {https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.cgd.5c00347},
number = {8},
pages = {2717--2729},
doi = {10.1021/acs.cgd.5c00347}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Ghanavati, Mohammad Amin, et al. “Cocrystal Formation Prediction: Hybrid GIN-Mordred Model Outperforms DFT-Based Methods.” Crystal Growth and Design, vol. 25, no. 8, Mar. 2025, pp. 2717-2729. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.cgd.5c00347.