Environmental Science & Technology, volume 50, issue 7, pages 3762-3772

Global Estimates of Fine Particulate Matter using a Combined Geophysical-Statistical Method with Information from Satellites, Models, and Monitors

Aaron van Donkelaar 1
Randall Martin 1, 2
Markus Brauer 3
N Y Hsu 4
Ralph A.A. Kahn 4
Robert C. Levy 4
Lyapustin A 4, 5
Andrew M. Sayer 4, 5
D. M. Winker 6
Show full list: 9 authors
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2016-03-24
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR3.516
CiteScore17.5
Impact factor10.8
ISSN0013936X, 15205851
General Chemistry
Environmental Chemistry
Abstract
We estimated global fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations using information from satellite-, simulation- and monitor-based sources by applying a Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) to global geophysically based satellite-derived PM2.5 estimates. Aerosol optical depth from multiple satellite products (MISR, MODIS Dark Target, MODIS and SeaWiFS Deep Blue, and MODIS MAIAC) was combined with simulation (GEOS-Chem) based upon their relative uncertainties as determined using ground-based sun photometer (AERONET) observations for 1998-2014. The GWR predictors included simulated aerosol composition and land use information. The resultant PM2.5 estimates were highly consistent (R(2) = 0.81) with out-of-sample cross-validated PM2.5 concentrations from monitors. The global population-weighted annual average PM2.5 concentrations were 3-fold higher than the 10 μg/m(3) WHO guideline, driven by exposures in Asian and African regions. Estimates in regions with high contributions from mineral dust were associated with higher uncertainty, resulting from both sparse ground-based monitoring, and challenging conditions for retrieval and simulation. This approach demonstrates that the addition of even sparse ground-based measurements to more globally continuous PM2.5 data sources can yield valuable improvements to PM2.5 characterization on a global scale.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
20
30
40
50
60
70

Publishers

50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?