Carbon Nanotubes versus Graphene as Flexible Transparent Electrodes in Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells.
Il Jeon
1
,
Jungjin Yoon
2
,
Namyoung Ahn
2
,
Mohamed Atwa
1
,
Clément Delacou
1
,
Mansoo Choi
2
,
Shigeo Maruyama
1, 5
,
Yutaka MATSUO
1, 6
3
Canatu, Ltd., Konalankuja 5, FI-00390 Helsinki, Finland
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2017-10-23
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 1.394
CiteScore: 8.7
Impact factor: 4.6
ISSN: 19487185
PubMed ID:
28994283
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
General Materials Science
Abstract
Transparent carbon electrodes, carbon nanotubes, and graphene were used as the bottom electrode in flexible inverted perovskite solar cells. Their photovoltaic performance and mechanical resilience were compared and analyzed using various techniques. Whereas a conventional inverted perovskite solar cells using indium tin oxide showed a power conversion efficiency of 17.8%, the carbon nanotube- and graphene-based cells showed efficiencies of 12.8% and 14.2%, respectively. An established MoO3 doping was used for carbon electrode-based devices. The difference in the photovoltaic performance between the carbon nanotube- and graphene-based cells was due to the difference in morphology and transmittance. Raman spectroscopy, and cyclic flexural testing revealed that the graphene-based cells were more susceptible to strain than the carbon nanotube-based cells, though the difference was marginal. Overall, despite higher performance, the transfer step for graphene has lower reproducibility. Thus, the development of better graphene transfer methods would help maximize the current capacity of graphene-based cells.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
|
|
Advanced Functional Materials
7 publications, 4.22%
|
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
5 publications, 3.01%
|
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
4 publications, 2.41%
|
|
|
Nano Energy
4 publications, 2.41%
|
|
|
Carbon
4 publications, 2.41%
|
|
|
Advanced Energy Materials
4 publications, 2.41%
|
|
|
Solar RRL
4 publications, 2.41%
|
|
|
Small Structures
3 publications, 1.81%
|
|
|
Materials
3 publications, 1.81%
|
|
|
Nanomaterials
3 publications, 1.81%
|
|
|
Materials Today Energy
3 publications, 1.81%
|
|
|
Advanced Science
3 publications, 1.81%
|
|
|
Advanced Materials
3 publications, 1.81%
|
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
3 publications, 1.81%
|
|
|
ACS Omega
3 publications, 1.81%
|
|
|
ACS Energy Letters
3 publications, 1.81%
|
|
|
Chemical Society Reviews
3 publications, 1.81%
|
|
|
ACS Applied Energy Materials
2 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Journal of Applied Physics
2 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Thin Solid Films
2 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Flexible and Printed Electronics
2 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Organic Electronics
2 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
2 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Journal of Energy Chemistry
2 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Nano Today
2 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Carbon Energy
2 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Small Methods
2 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry C
2 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Applied Physics Letters
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
Publishers
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
|
Wiley
45 publications, 27.11%
|
|
|
Elsevier
44 publications, 26.51%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
21 publications, 12.65%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
15 publications, 9.04%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
12 publications, 7.23%
|
|
|
MDPI
10 publications, 6.02%
|
|
|
IOP Publishing
5 publications, 3.01%
|
|
|
AIP Publishing
4 publications, 2.41%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
2 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
2 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
|
IntechOpen
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
166
Total citations:
166
Citations from 2024:
33
(19%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Jeon I. et al. Carbon Nanotubes versus Graphene as Flexible Transparent Electrodes in Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells. // Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 21. pp. 5395-5401.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Jeon I., Yoon J., Ahn N., Atwa M., Delacou C., Anisimov A. A., Kauppinen E. I., Choi M., Maruyama S., MATSUO Y. Carbon Nanotubes versus Graphene as Flexible Transparent Electrodes in Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells. // Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 21. pp. 5395-5401.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02229
UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02229
TI - Carbon Nanotubes versus Graphene as Flexible Transparent Electrodes in Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells.
T2 - Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
AU - Jeon, Il
AU - Yoon, Jungjin
AU - Ahn, Namyoung
AU - Atwa, Mohamed
AU - Delacou, Clément
AU - Anisimov, Anton A.
AU - Kauppinen, Esko I.
AU - Choi, Mansoo
AU - Maruyama, Shigeo
AU - MATSUO, Yutaka
PY - 2017
DA - 2017/10/23
PB - American Chemical Society (ACS)
SP - 5395-5401
IS - 21
VL - 8
PMID - 28994283
SN - 1948-7185
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2017_Jeon,
author = {Il Jeon and Jungjin Yoon and Namyoung Ahn and Mohamed Atwa and Clément Delacou and Anton A. Anisimov and Esko I. Kauppinen and Mansoo Choi and Shigeo Maruyama and Yutaka MATSUO},
title = {Carbon Nanotubes versus Graphene as Flexible Transparent Electrodes in Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells.},
journal = {Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters},
year = {2017},
volume = {8},
publisher = {American Chemical Society (ACS)},
month = {oct},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02229},
number = {21},
pages = {5395--5401},
doi = {10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02229}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Jeon, Il, et al. “Carbon Nanotubes versus Graphene as Flexible Transparent Electrodes in Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells..” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 8, no. 21, Oct. 2017, pp. 5395-5401. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02229.