volume 11 issue 9 pages 9093-9102

Endogenous Catalytic Generation of O2 Bubbles for In Situ Ultrasound-Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation.

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2017-08-16
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR4.497
CiteScore24.2
Impact factor16.0
ISSN19360851, 1936086X
General Physics and Astronomy
General Materials Science
General Engineering
Abstract
High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) surgery generally suffers from poor precision and low efficiency in clinical application, especially for cancer therapy. Herein, a multiscale hybrid catalytic nanoreactor (catalase@MONs, abbreviated as C@M) has been developed as a tumor-sensitive contrast and synergistic agent (C&SA) for ultrasound-guided HIFU cancer surgery, by integrating dendritic-structured mesoporous organosilica nanoparticles (MONs) and catalase immobilized in the large open pore channels of MONs. Such a hybrid nanoreactor exhibited sensitive catalytic activity toward H2O2, facilitating the continuous O2 gas generation in a relatively mild manner even if incubated with 10 μM H2O2, which finally led to enhanced ablation in the tissue-mimicking PAA gel model after HIFU exposure mainly resulting from intensified cavitation effect. The C@M nanoparticles could be accumulated within the H2O2-enriched tumor region through enhanced permeability and retention effect, enabling durable contrast enhancement of ultrasound imaging, and highly efficient tumor ablation under relatively low power of HIFU exposure in vivo. Very different from the traditional perfluorocarbon-based C&SA, such an on-demand catalytic nanoreactor could realize the accurate positioning of tumor without HIFU prestimulation and efficient HIFU ablation with a much safer power output, which is highly desired in clinical HIFU application.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
ACS applied materials & interfaces
8 publications, 5.23%
ACS Nano
7 publications, 4.58%
Advanced Materials
6 publications, 3.92%
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
5 publications, 3.27%
Advanced Functional Materials
5 publications, 3.27%
Chemical Reviews
4 publications, 2.61%
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
4 publications, 2.61%
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
4 publications, 2.61%
Biomaterials
4 publications, 2.61%
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology
4 publications, 2.61%
ACS Applied Bio Materials
4 publications, 2.61%
Biomaterials Science
4 publications, 2.61%
Advanced healthcare materials
3 publications, 1.96%
Small
3 publications, 1.96%
International Journal of Nanomedicine
3 publications, 1.96%
Environmental Chemistry Letters
2 publications, 1.31%
Acta Biomaterialia
2 publications, 1.31%
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
2 publications, 1.31%
Advanced Science
2 publications, 1.31%
Advanced Therapeutics
2 publications, 1.31%
Angewandte Chemie
2 publications, 1.31%
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
2 publications, 1.31%
ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering
2 publications, 1.31%
Molecular Pharmaceutics
2 publications, 1.31%
RSC Advances
2 publications, 1.31%
Journal of Materials Chemistry B
2 publications, 1.31%
Nanoscale
2 publications, 1.31%
Nanoscale Horizons
2 publications, 1.31%
Current Medicinal Chemistry
1 publication, 0.65%
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
1 publication, 0.65%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Elsevier
37 publications, 24.18%
Wiley
36 publications, 23.53%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
31 publications, 20.26%
Springer Nature
15 publications, 9.8%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
15 publications, 9.8%
Taylor & Francis
7 publications, 4.58%
MDPI
5 publications, 3.27%
Walter de Gruyter
2 publications, 1.31%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 publication, 0.65%
BMJ
1 publication, 0.65%
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
1 publication, 0.65%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 0.65%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 publication, 0.65%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
154
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Liu T. et al. Endogenous Catalytic Generation of O2 Bubbles for In Situ Ultrasound-Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation. // ACS Nano. 2017. Vol. 11. No. 9. pp. 9093-9102.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Liu T., Nan Z., Wang Z., Wu M., Chen Yu., Ma M., Chen H., Shi J. Endogenous Catalytic Generation of O2 Bubbles for In Situ Ultrasound-Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation. // ACS Nano. 2017. Vol. 11. No. 9. pp. 9093-9102.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1021/acsnano.7b03772
UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b03772
TI - Endogenous Catalytic Generation of O2 Bubbles for In Situ Ultrasound-Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation.
T2 - ACS Nano
AU - Liu, Tianzhi
AU - Nan, Zhang
AU - Wang, Zhigang
AU - Wu, Mei-Ying
AU - Chen, Yu
AU - Ma, Ming
AU - Chen, Hangrong
AU - Shi, Jianlin
PY - 2017
DA - 2017/08/16
PB - American Chemical Society (ACS)
SP - 9093-9102
IS - 9
VL - 11
PMID - 28796487
SN - 1936-0851
SN - 1936-086X
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2017_Liu,
author = {Tianzhi Liu and Zhang Nan and Zhigang Wang and Mei-Ying Wu and Yu Chen and Ming Ma and Hangrong Chen and Jianlin Shi},
title = {Endogenous Catalytic Generation of O2 Bubbles for In Situ Ultrasound-Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation.},
journal = {ACS Nano},
year = {2017},
volume = {11},
publisher = {American Chemical Society (ACS)},
month = {aug},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b03772},
number = {9},
pages = {9093--9102},
doi = {10.1021/acsnano.7b03772}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Liu, Tianzhi, et al. “Endogenous Catalytic Generation of O2 Bubbles for In Situ Ultrasound-Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation..” ACS Nano, vol. 11, no. 9, Aug. 2017, pp. 9093-9102. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b03772.