Energy & Fuels, volume 25, issue 7, pages 3068-3076

Comparison of Coal-Derived and Petroleum Asphaltenes by 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, DEPT, and XRS

A Ballard Andrews 1
John C Edwards 2
Andrew E. Pomerantz 1
Oliver C. Mullins 1
Dennis Nordlund 3
Koyo Norinaga 4
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2011-06-21
Journal: Energy & Fuels
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q1
Impact factor5.3
ISSN08870624, 15205029
General Chemical Engineering
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Fuel Technology
Abstract
The molecular architecture of asphaltenes is still a matter of debate. Some literature reports provide evidence that the contrast of petroleum asphaltenes versus coal-derived asphaltenes is useful for understanding the governing principles of asphaltene identity. Coal-derived asphaltenes provide an excellent test for understanding the relationship of asphaltene molecular architecture with asphaltene properties. Diffusion measurements have shown that coal-derived asphaltenes are half the size of many crude oil asphaltenes, but there are relatively few studies comparing coal-derived and petroleum asphaltenes using liquid state 13C NMR. 13C NMR confirms that the molecular sizes of these coal-derived asphaltenes are smaller than virgin petroleum asphaltenes. DEPT-45 experiments were performed in order to determine the relative amount of nonprotonated and protonated carbon in the aromatic region of the spectrum. In contrast to previous NMR work on asphaltenes that ignored interior bridgehead carbon, we show th...

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Energy & Fuels
40 publications, 37.38%
Fuel
15 publications, 14.02%
Fuel Processing Technology
3 publications, 2.8%
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
3 publications, 2.8%
Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME
2 publications, 1.87%
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
2 publications, 1.87%
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
2 publications, 1.87%
Materials Today Communications
1 publication, 0.93%
Applied Spectroscopy
1 publication, 0.93%
Processes
1 publication, 0.93%
Geochemistry
1 publication, 0.93%
Petroleum Chemistry
1 publication, 0.93%
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
1 publication, 0.93%
Journal of the Energy Institute
1 publication, 0.93%
PLoS ONE
1 publication, 0.93%
Chemical Physics Letters
1 publication, 0.93%
Energy Procedia
1 publication, 0.93%
Energy
1 publication, 0.93%
Journal of Energy Chemistry
1 publication, 0.93%
Petroleum Science
1 publication, 0.93%
Egyptian Journal of Petroleum
1 publication, 0.93%
Organic Geochemistry
1 publication, 0.93%
Analytical Chemistry
1 publication, 0.93%
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
1 publication, 0.93%
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1 publication, 0.93%
Langmuir
1 publication, 0.93%
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
1 publication, 0.93%
ChemPhysChem
1 publication, 0.93%
RSC Advances
1 publication, 0.93%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
American Chemical Society (ACS)
47 publications, 43.93%
Elsevier
36 publications, 33.64%
Springer Nature
4 publications, 3.74%
Society of Petroleum Engineers
3 publications, 2.8%
ASME International
2 publications, 1.87%
Pleiades Publishing
2 publications, 1.87%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 publications, 1.87%
SAGE
1 publication, 0.93%
MDPI
1 publication, 0.93%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.93%
Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute
1 publication, 0.93%
Wiley
1 publication, 0.93%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 0.93%
Annual Reviews
1 publication, 0.93%
EJournal Publishing
1 publication, 0.93%
1 publication, 0.93%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 0.93%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Andrews A. B. et al. Comparison of Coal-Derived and Petroleum Asphaltenes by 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, DEPT, and XRS // Energy & Fuels. 2011. Vol. 25. No. 7. pp. 3068-3076.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Andrews A. B., Edwards J. C., Pomerantz A. E., Mullins O. C., Nordlund D., Norinaga K. Comparison of Coal-Derived and Petroleum Asphaltenes by 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, DEPT, and XRS // Energy & Fuels. 2011. Vol. 25. No. 7. pp. 3068-3076.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1021/ef2003443
UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/ef2003443
TI - Comparison of Coal-Derived and Petroleum Asphaltenes by 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, DEPT, and XRS
T2 - Energy & Fuels
AU - Andrews, A Ballard
AU - Edwards, John C
AU - Pomerantz, Andrew E.
AU - Mullins, Oliver C.
AU - Nordlund, Dennis
AU - Norinaga, Koyo
PY - 2011
DA - 2011/06/21
PB - American Chemical Society (ACS)
SP - 3068-3076
IS - 7
VL - 25
SN - 0887-0624
SN - 1520-5029
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2011_Andrews,
author = {A Ballard Andrews and John C Edwards and Andrew E. Pomerantz and Oliver C. Mullins and Dennis Nordlund and Koyo Norinaga},
title = {Comparison of Coal-Derived and Petroleum Asphaltenes by 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, DEPT, and XRS},
journal = {Energy & Fuels},
year = {2011},
volume = {25},
publisher = {American Chemical Society (ACS)},
month = {jun},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/ef2003443},
number = {7},
pages = {3068--3076},
doi = {10.1021/ef2003443}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Andrews, A. Ballard, et al. “Comparison of Coal-Derived and Petroleum Asphaltenes by 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, DEPT, and XRS.” Energy & Fuels, vol. 25, no. 7, Jun. 2011, pp. 3068-3076. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef2003443.
Found error?