volume 1 issue 1/2 pages 35-43

An Example of the Difference Between Quantum and Classical Random Walks

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2002-01-01
scimago Q2
wos Q1
SJR0.477
CiteScore4.3
Impact factor2.2
ISSN15700755, 15731332
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Theoretical Computer Science
Signal Processing
Modeling and Simulation
Abstract
In this note, we discuss a general definition of quantum random walks on graphs and illustrate with a simple graph the possibility of very different behavior between a classical random walk and its quantum analog. In this graph, propagation between a particular pair of nodes is exponentially faster in the quantum case. PACS: 03.67.Hk
Found 

Top-30

Journals

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Physical Review A
82 publications, 23.84%
Quantum Information Processing
30 publications, 8.72%
Physical Review E
16 publications, 4.65%
Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical
13 publications, 3.78%
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
9 publications, 2.62%
Physical Review Research
8 publications, 2.33%
Journal of Physics A General Physics
8 publications, 2.33%
International Journal of Quantum Information
7 publications, 2.03%
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
7 publications, 2.03%
Entropy
6 publications, 1.74%
New Journal of Physics
6 publications, 1.74%
Chinese Physics B
5 publications, 1.45%
Scientific Reports
4 publications, 1.16%
Journal of Chemical Physics
4 publications, 1.16%
Journal of Mathematical Physics
4 publications, 1.16%
Physical Review Letters
4 publications, 1.16%
Physical Review B
4 publications, 1.16%
International Journal of Theoretical Physics
4 publications, 1.16%
Annals of Physics
4 publications, 1.16%
Communications in Mathematical Physics
3 publications, 0.87%
Physica Scripta
3 publications, 0.87%
Pattern Recognition
3 publications, 0.87%
Quantum
3 publications, 0.87%
Acta Physica Sinica
3 publications, 0.87%
Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics
2 publications, 0.58%
npj Quantum Information
2 publications, 0.58%
European Physical Journal B
2 publications, 0.58%
Communications in Theoretical Physics
2 publications, 0.58%
Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics
2 publications, 0.58%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90

Publishers

20
40
60
80
100
120
American Physical Society (APS)
115 publications, 33.43%
Springer Nature
69 publications, 20.06%
IOP Publishing
42 publications, 12.21%
Elsevier
34 publications, 9.88%
World Scientific
12 publications, 3.49%
AIP Publishing
9 publications, 2.62%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
7 publications, 2.03%
MDPI
6 publications, 1.74%
Wiley
6 publications, 1.74%
Optica Publishing Group
5 publications, 1.45%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
5 publications, 1.45%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
4 publications, 1.16%
Verein zur Forderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften
3 publications, 0.87%
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
3 publications, 0.87%
Oxford University Press
2 publications, 0.58%
Canadian Science Publishing
1 publication, 0.29%
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
1 publication, 0.29%
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
1 publication, 0.29%
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.29%
Mathematical Society of Japan (Project Euclid)
1 publication, 0.29%
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 0.29%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 publication, 0.29%
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.29%
Stichting SciPost
1 publication, 0.29%
proceedings of the american control conference
1 publication, 0.29%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 publication, 0.29%
The Royal Society
1 publication, 0.29%
20
40
60
80
100
120
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
344
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
CHILDS A. M., Farhi E., Gutmann S. An Example of the Difference Between Quantum and Classical Random Walks // Quantum Information Processing. 2002. Vol. 1. No. 1/2. pp. 35-43.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
CHILDS A. M., Farhi E., Gutmann S. An Example of the Difference Between Quantum and Classical Random Walks // Quantum Information Processing. 2002. Vol. 1. No. 1/2. pp. 35-43.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1023/A:1019609420309
UR - https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019609420309
TI - An Example of the Difference Between Quantum and Classical Random Walks
T2 - Quantum Information Processing
AU - CHILDS, ANDREW M.
AU - Farhi, Edward
AU - Gutmann, Sam
PY - 2002
DA - 2002/01/01
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 35-43
IS - 1/2
VL - 1
SN - 1570-0755
SN - 1573-1332
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2002_CHILDS,
author = {ANDREW M. CHILDS and Edward Farhi and Sam Gutmann},
title = {An Example of the Difference Between Quantum and Classical Random Walks},
journal = {Quantum Information Processing},
year = {2002},
volume = {1},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019609420309},
number = {1/2},
pages = {35--43},
doi = {10.1023/A:1019609420309}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
CHILDS, ANDREW M., et al. “An Example of the Difference Between Quantum and Classical Random Walks.” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 1, no. 1/2, Jan. 2002, pp. 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019609420309.