volume 27 issue 12 pages 2579-2597

Plant Phenolics as Dietary Antioxidants for Herbivorous Insects: A Test with Genetically Modified Tobacco

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2001-01-01
scimago Q1
wos Q3
SJR0.701
CiteScore4.1
Impact factor1.8
ISSN00980331, 15731561
Biochemistry
General Medicine
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Abstract
High foliar phenolics are generally assumed to increase resistance to insect herbivores, but recent studies show that tobacco lines modified to over– and underexpress phenolics do not exhibit higher constitutive resistance to caterpillars. This is contrary to the expectation that ingestion of tobacco phenolics, particularly chlorogenic acid, should cause oxidative stress in herbivores. We investigated free radical production and antioxidant capacity of fresh crushed leaves of tobacco lines exhibiting over a sixfold difference in chlorogenic acid content to test whether high phenolic concentrations are associated with increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The effects of in planta phenolic levels on feeding behavior, growth, biochemical markers of oxidative stress, and the antioxidant capacity of midgut fluid and hemolymph were assessed in tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens. The experiments showed that high phenolic foliage was more prooxidant than low phenolic foliage, but the net balance in crushed tissue was antioxidant in comparison to buffer and the commercial antioxidant standard, Trolox. In H. virescens, the antioxidant capacity of midgut fluid was also powerful, and caterpillars fed high phenolic foliage did not exhibit the expected markers of oxidative stress in midgut tissues (altered ascorbate ratios, disulfides, or total hydroperoxides). Instead, hemolymph of larvae fed high phenolic foliage exhibited improved total Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC). These results suggest that the elevated foliar phenolics in some plants may have beneficial antioxidant properties for herbivorous insects, much as dietary phenolics do in mammals.
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
Journal of Chemical Ecology
6 publications, 8.33%
Phytochemistry
3 publications, 4.17%
Insects
3 publications, 4.17%
Journal of Pest Science
2 publications, 2.78%
Oecologia
2 publications, 2.78%
Journal of Insect Physiology
2 publications, 2.78%
Journal of Economic Entomology
2 publications, 2.78%
Metallurgical Research and Technology
1 publication, 1.39%
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
1 publication, 1.39%
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
1 publication, 1.39%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
1 publication, 1.39%
Antioxidants
1 publication, 1.39%
Theoretical And Applied Genetics
1 publication, 1.39%
Nature Biotechnology
1 publication, 1.39%
Ambio
1 publication, 1.39%
Chemoecology
1 publication, 1.39%
Experimental and Applied Acarology
1 publication, 1.39%
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation
1 publication, 1.39%
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
1 publication, 1.39%
Journal of Stored Products Research
1 publication, 1.39%
ZooKeys
1 publication, 1.39%
PLoS ONE
1 publication, 1.39%
Peptides
1 publication, 1.39%
Food Chemistry
1 publication, 1.39%
Trends in Ecology and Evolution
1 publication, 1.39%
Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology
1 publication, 1.39%
New Phytologist
1 publication, 1.39%
Plant Journal
1 publication, 1.39%
Pest Management Science
1 publication, 1.39%
1
2
3
4
5
6

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
Springer Nature
21 publications, 29.17%
Elsevier
13 publications, 18.06%
Wiley
10 publications, 13.89%
MDPI
6 publications, 8.33%
Taylor & Francis
4 publications, 5.56%
Oxford University Press
3 publications, 4.17%
EDP Sciences
1 publication, 1.39%
The Electrochemical Society
1 publication, 1.39%
Pensoft Publishers
1 publication, 1.39%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 1.39%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1 publication, 1.39%
Pleiades Publishing
1 publication, 1.39%
Georgia Entomological Society, Inc.
1 publication, 1.39%
Sociedade Brasileira de Herbicidas e Ervas Daninhas
1 publication, 1.39%
Entomological Society of America
1 publication, 1.39%
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 1.39%
American Physiological Society
1 publication, 1.39%
Biology Centre, AS CR
1 publication, 1.39%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 publication, 1.39%
5
10
15
20
25
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
73
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Johnson K. S., Felton G. W. Plant Phenolics as Dietary Antioxidants for Herbivorous Insects: A Test with Genetically Modified Tobacco // Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2001. Vol. 27. No. 12. pp. 2579-2597.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Johnson K. S., Felton G. W. Plant Phenolics as Dietary Antioxidants for Herbivorous Insects: A Test with Genetically Modified Tobacco // Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2001. Vol. 27. No. 12. pp. 2579-2597.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1023/a:1013691802028
UR - https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013691802028
TI - Plant Phenolics as Dietary Antioxidants for Herbivorous Insects: A Test with Genetically Modified Tobacco
T2 - Journal of Chemical Ecology
AU - Johnson, Kelly S.
AU - Felton, Gary W.
PY - 2001
DA - 2001/01/01
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 2579-2597
IS - 12
VL - 27
PMID - 11789960
SN - 0098-0331
SN - 1573-1561
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2001_Johnson,
author = {Kelly S. Johnson and Gary W. Felton},
title = {Plant Phenolics as Dietary Antioxidants for Herbivorous Insects: A Test with Genetically Modified Tobacco},
journal = {Journal of Chemical Ecology},
year = {2001},
volume = {27},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013691802028},
number = {12},
pages = {2579--2597},
doi = {10.1023/a:1013691802028}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Johnson, Kelly S., and Gary W. Felton. “Plant Phenolics as Dietary Antioxidants for Herbivorous Insects: A Test with Genetically Modified Tobacco.” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 27, no. 12, Jan. 2001, pp. 2579-2597. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013691802028.