Facts, uncertainties, and opportunities in wheat molecular improvement

The year 2020 was a landmark year for wheat. The wheat HB4 event harboring a drought-resistant gene from sunflowers, received regulatory approval and was grown commercially in Argentina, with approval for food and feed in other countries. This, indeed, is many years after the adoption of genetic modifications in other crops. The lack of consumer acceptance and resulting trade barriers halted the commercialization of the earliest events and had a chilling effect on, especially, private Research & Development (R&D) investments. As regulations for modern breeding technologies such as genome-edited cultivars are being discussed and/or adopted across the globe, we would like to propose a framework to ensure that wheat is not left behind a second time as the potential benefits far outweigh the perceived risks. In this paper, after a review of the technical challenges wheat faces with the generation of trans- and cis-genic wheat varieties, we discuss some of the factors that could help demystify the risk/reward equation and thereby the consumer’s reluctance or acceptance of these techniques for future wheat improvement. The advent of next-generation sequencing is shedding light on natural gene transfer between species and the number of perturbations other accepted techniques like mutagenesis create. The transition from classic breeding techniques and embracing transgenic, cisgenic, and genome editing approaches feels inevitable for wheat improvement if we are to develop climate-resilient wheat varieties to feed a growing world population.