volume 54 issue 5 pages 581-592

Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects

Laura Howe 1, 2
M.J.M Nivard 3
Tim T. Morris 1, 2
Humaira Rasheed 1, 4
Yoonsu Cho 1, 2
Penelope A. Lind 5, 6, 7
Teemu Palviainen 8
Matthijs D. van der Zee 3
Massimo Mangino 9, 10
Yunzhang Wang 11
Lucija Klarić 12
Marianne Nygaard 14, 15
Alexandros Giannelis 16
Emily A. Willoughby 16
Chandra A. Reynolds 17
Jared Balbona 18, 19
Ole A. Andreassen 20, 21
Helga Ask 22
Aris Baras 23
Christopher R Bauer 24, 25
Dorret I. Boomsma 3, 26
Archie Campbell 27
Z. Chen 28, 29
Elizabeth Corfield 22, 30
Luke T. Evans 19, 31
Scott E. Gordon 32
Kathryn Paige Harden 33
Amanda Hughes 1, 2
Shona M. Kerr 12
Hyeokmoon Kweon 34
Debbie A Lawlor 1, 2, 35
P Magnusson 11
Travis T. Mallard 33
Pekka Martikainen 36, 37, 38
Pål R. Njølstad 39, 40
John D Overton 23
David J. Porteous 27
J.B. Reid 23
Melissa C Southey 41, 42, 43
Camilla Stoltenberg 44, 45
Elliot M. Tucker-Drob 33
Margaret L. Wright 46
Hyeokmoon Kweon 18, 19
Philipp D Koellinger 18, 19
Daniel J. Benjamin 18, 19
Laurence J. Howe 14, 15, 47
Michel G Nivard 13
Tim T Morris 13
AILIN F. HANSEN 13, 48
Humaira Rasheed 12, 49
Yoonsu Cho 50
Geetha Chittoor 11
Rafael Ahlskog 9
Penelope A. Lind 51, 52
TEEMU PALVIAINEN 51
MATTHIJS D. VAN DER ZEE 22, 30, 53
Rosa Cheesman 3
Massimo Mangino 32
Yunzhang Wang 54
Shuai Li 55
Lucija Klarić 28, 29
Scott M Ratliff 4, 56
Lawrence F. Bielak 44, 57
Marianne Nygaard 4, 58, 59
Alexandros Giannelis 4, 56, 60
Emily A. Willoughby 34, 61
Chandra A. Reynolds 8
Jared V Balbona 5, 7, 62
Ole A Andreassen 28, 29
Helga Ask 63, 64, 65
Dorret I. Boomsma 66, 67
Archie Campbell 1, 68, 69
Harry Campbell 1, 2
Zhengming Chen 12
Paraskevi Christofidou 1, 4, 56
Elizabeth Corfield 1, 2
Christina C. Dahm 1, 2, 4
10
 
NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Foundation Trust, London, UK
23
 
Regeneron Genetics Center, Tarrytown, USA
24
 
Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc., Novato, USA
25
 
Biomedical and Translational Informatics, Geisinger Health, Danville, USA
26
 
Amsterdam Public Health (APH) and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development (AR&D), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
30
 
Nic Waals institute, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
35
 
Bristol NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
55
 
Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger Health, Danville, USA
65
 
National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, USA
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-05-09
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR16.586
CiteScore45.1
Impact factor29.0
ISSN10614036, 15461718
Genetics
Abstract
Estimates from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of unrelated individuals capture effects of inherited variation (direct effects), demography (population stratification, assortative mating) and relatives (indirect genetic effects). Family-based GWAS designs can control for demographic and indirect genetic effects, but large-scale family datasets have been lacking. We combined data from 178,086 siblings from 19 cohorts to generate population (between-family) and within-sibship (within-family) GWAS estimates for 25 phenotypes. Within-sibship GWAS estimates were smaller than population estimates for height, educational attainment, age at first birth, number of children, cognitive ability, depressive symptoms and smoking. Some differences were observed in downstream SNP heritability, genetic correlations and Mendelian randomization analyses. For example, the within-sibship genetic correlation between educational attainment and body mass index attenuated towards zero. In contrast, analyses of most molecular phenotypes (for example, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol) were generally consistent. We also found within-sibship evidence of polygenic adaptation on taller height. Here, we illustrate the importance of family-based GWAS data for phenotypes influenced by demographic and indirect genetic effects. Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses using data from 178,076 siblings illustrate differences between population-based and within-sibship GWAS estimates for phenotypes influenced by demographic and indirect genetic effects.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
Nature Human Behaviour
11 publications, 3.89%
medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
11 publications, 3.89%
Nature Communications
10 publications, 3.53%
bioRxiv
7 publications, 2.47%
Molecular Psychiatry
6 publications, 2.12%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
5 publications, 1.77%
Psychological Medicine
5 publications, 1.77%
Nature Genetics
4 publications, 1.41%
Demography
4 publications, 1.41%
Behavior Genetics
3 publications, 1.06%
Scientific Reports
3 publications, 1.06%
Journal of Affective Disorders
3 publications, 1.06%
Communications Medicine
3 publications, 1.06%
International Journal of Epidemiology
3 publications, 1.06%
Nature
3 publications, 1.06%
Genetic Epidemiology
3 publications, 1.06%
Biological Psychiatry
3 publications, 1.06%
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
2 publications, 0.71%
BMJ Mental Health
2 publications, 0.71%
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
2 publications, 0.71%
Economics and Human Biology
2 publications, 0.71%
American Journal of Human Genetics
2 publications, 0.71%
Twin Research and Human Genetics
2 publications, 0.71%
Genes
2 publications, 0.71%
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines
2 publications, 0.71%
Human Genetics
2 publications, 0.71%
Cell
2 publications, 0.71%
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
2 publications, 0.71%
Cureus
2 publications, 0.71%
2
4
6
8
10
12

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Springer Nature
77 publications, 27.21%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
65 publications, 22.97%
Elsevier
38 publications, 13.43%
Wiley
16 publications, 5.65%
Oxford University Press
12 publications, 4.24%
Frontiers Media S.A.
8 publications, 2.83%
Cambridge University Press
8 publications, 2.83%
SAGE
5 publications, 1.77%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
5 publications, 1.77%
BMJ
4 publications, 1.41%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
4 publications, 1.41%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
4 publications, 1.41%
MDPI
4 publications, 1.41%
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
2 publications, 0.71%
Research Square Platform LLC
2 publications, 0.71%
American Medical Association (AMA)
2 publications, 0.71%
Duke University Press
2 publications, 0.71%
American Society for Nutrition
1 publication, 0.35%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 publication, 0.35%
eLife Sciences Publications
1 publication, 0.35%
F1000 Research
1 publication, 0.35%
IntechOpen
1 publication, 0.35%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 0.35%
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
1 publication, 0.35%
S. Karger AG
1 publication, 0.35%
The Endocrine Society
1 publication, 0.35%
IOS Press
1 publication, 0.35%
Annual Reviews
1 publication, 0.35%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
284
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Howe L. et al. Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects // Nature Genetics. 2022. Vol. 54. No. 5. pp. 581-592.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Howe L. et al. Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects // Nature Genetics. 2022. Vol. 54. No. 5. pp. 581-592.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_Howe,
author = {Laura Howe and M.J.M Nivard and Tim T. Morris and Humaira Rasheed and Yoonsu Cho and Penelope A. Lind and Teemu Palviainen and Matthijs D. van der Zee and Massimo Mangino and Yunzhang Wang and Lucija Klarić and Lawrence F Bielak and Marianne Nygaard and Alexandros Giannelis and Emily A. Willoughby and Chandra A. Reynolds and Jared Balbona and Ole A. Andreassen and Helga Ask and Aris Baras and Christopher R Bauer and Dorret I. Boomsma and Archie Campbell and Z. Chen and Elizabeth Corfield and Luke T. Evans and Scott E. Gordon and Kathryn Paige Harden and Amanda Hughes and Shona M. Kerr and Hyeokmoon Kweon and Debbie A Lawlor and P Magnusson and Travis T. Mallard and Pekka Martikainen and Pål R. Njølstad and John D Overton and David J. Porteous and J.B. Reid and Melissa C Southey and Camilla Stoltenberg and Elliot M. Tucker-Drob and Margaret L. Wright and Hyeokmoon Kweon and Philipp D Koellinger and Daniel J. Benjamin and Laurence J. Howe and Michel G Nivard and Tim T Morris and AILIN F. HANSEN and others},
title = {Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects},
journal = {Nature Genetics},
year = {2022},
volume = {54},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {may},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01062-7},
number = {5},
pages = {581--592},
doi = {10.1038/s41588-022-01062-7}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Howe, Laura, et al. “Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects.” Nature Genetics, vol. 54, no. 5, May. 2022, pp. 581-592. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01062-7.