Variational quantum algorithms
M Cerezo
1, 2, 3
,
Andrew Arrasmith
1, 3
,
Ryan Babbush
4
,
Simon C Benjamin
5
,
Suguru Endo
6
,
Keisuke Fujii
7, 8, 9
,
Kosuke Mitarai
7, 8, 10
,
Xiao Yuan
11, 12
,
Lukasz Cincio
1, 3
,
Patrick Coles
1, 3
3
Quantum Science Center, Oak Ridge, USA
|
4
Google Quantum AI Team, Venice, USA
|
6
NTT Secure Platform Laboratories, NTT Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2021-08-12
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 9.803
CiteScore: 60.3
Impact factor: 39.5
ISSN: 25225820
General Physics and Astronomy
Abstract
Applications such as simulating complicated quantum systems or solving large-scale linear algebra problems are very challenging for classical computers, owing to the extremely high computational cost. Quantum computers promise a solution, although fault-tolerant quantum computers will probably not be available in the near future. Current quantum devices have serious constraints, including limited numbers of qubits and noise processes that limit circuit depth. Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs), which use a classical optimizer to train a parameterized quantum circuit, have emerged as a leading strategy to address these constraints. VQAs have now been proposed for essentially all applications that researchers have envisaged for quantum computers, and they appear to be the best hope for obtaining quantum advantage. Nevertheless, challenges remain, including the trainability, accuracy and efficiency of VQAs. Here we overview the field of VQAs, discuss strategies to overcome their challenges and highlight the exciting prospects for using them to obtain quantum advantage. The advent of commercial quantum devices has ushered in the era of near-term quantum computing. Variational quantum algorithms are promising candidates to make use of these devices for achieving a practical quantum advantage over classical computers.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
|
Physical Review A
203 publications, 9.27%
|
|
|
Physical Review Research
118 publications, 5.39%
|
|
|
Quantum
118 publications, 5.39%
|
|
|
Quantum Science and Technology
75 publications, 3.42%
|
|
|
npj Quantum Information
55 publications, 2.51%
|
|
|
PRX Quantum
52 publications, 2.37%
|
|
|
Physical Review Letters
45 publications, 2.05%
|
|
|
Quantum Machine Intelligence
43 publications, 1.96%
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
42 publications, 1.92%
|
|
|
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
41 publications, 1.87%
|
|
|
Physical Review Applied
39 publications, 1.78%
|
|
|
Quantum Information Processing
36 publications, 1.64%
|
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
34 publications, 1.55%
|
|
|
New Journal of Physics
30 publications, 1.37%
|
|
|
Physical Review B
29 publications, 1.32%
|
|
|
Machine Learning: Science and Technology
27 publications, 1.23%
|
|
|
Advanced Quantum Technologies
26 publications, 1.19%
|
|
|
Nature Communications
24 publications, 1.1%
|
|
|
Physica Scripta
24 publications, 1.1%
|
|
|
EPJ Quantum Technology
23 publications, 1.05%
|
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering
23 publications, 1.05%
|
|
|
IEEE Access
22 publications, 1%
|
|
|
Entropy
21 publications, 0.96%
|
|
|
Communications Physics
18 publications, 0.82%
|
|
|
Journal of Supercomputing
16 publications, 0.73%
|
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
15 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Chinese Physics B
12 publications, 0.55%
|
|
|
Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical
12 publications, 0.55%
|
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
10 publications, 0.46%
|
|
|
50
100
150
200
250
|
Publishers
|
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
509 publications, 23.24%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
437 publications, 19.95%
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
386 publications, 17.63%
|
|
|
IOP Publishing
205 publications, 9.36%
|
|
|
Elsevier
144 publications, 6.58%
|
|
|
Verein zur Forderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften
120 publications, 5.48%
|
|
|
MDPI
70 publications, 3.2%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
63 publications, 2.88%
|
|
|
Wiley
41 publications, 1.87%
|
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
40 publications, 1.83%
|
|
|
AIP Publishing
34 publications, 1.55%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
15 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
15 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
10 publications, 0.46%
|
|
|
Stichting SciPost
8 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
Science in China Press
6 publications, 0.27%
|
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
6 publications, 0.27%
|
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
6 publications, 0.27%
|
|
|
American Vacuum Society
5 publications, 0.23%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
5 publications, 0.23%
|
|
|
World Scientific
4 publications, 0.18%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
4 publications, 0.18%
|
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
|
IGI Global
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
2 publications, 0.09%
|
|
|
The Royal Society
2 publications, 0.09%
|
|
|
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
2.2k
Total citations:
2191
Citations from 2024:
1386
(63.29%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Cerezo M. et al. Variational quantum algorithms // Nature Reviews Physics. 2021. Vol. 3. No. 9. pp. 625-644.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Cerezo M., Arrasmith A., Babbush R., Benjamin S. C., Endo S., Fujii K., McClean J. R., Mitarai K., Yuan X., Cincio L., Coles P. Variational quantum algorithms // Nature Reviews Physics. 2021. Vol. 3. No. 9. pp. 625-644.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9
UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s42254-021-00348-9
TI - Variational quantum algorithms
T2 - Nature Reviews Physics
AU - Cerezo, M
AU - Arrasmith, Andrew
AU - Babbush, Ryan
AU - Benjamin, Simon C
AU - Endo, Suguru
AU - Fujii, Keisuke
AU - McClean, Jarrod R.
AU - Mitarai, Kosuke
AU - Yuan, Xiao
AU - Cincio, Lukasz
AU - Coles, Patrick
PY - 2021
DA - 2021/08/12
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 625-644
IS - 9
VL - 3
SN - 2522-5820
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2021_Cerezo,
author = {M Cerezo and Andrew Arrasmith and Ryan Babbush and Simon C Benjamin and Suguru Endo and Keisuke Fujii and Jarrod R. McClean and Kosuke Mitarai and Xiao Yuan and Lukasz Cincio and Patrick Coles},
title = {Variational quantum algorithms},
journal = {Nature Reviews Physics},
year = {2021},
volume = {3},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {aug},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s42254-021-00348-9},
number = {9},
pages = {625--644},
doi = {10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Cerezo, M., et al. “Variational quantum algorithms.” Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 3, no. 9, Aug. 2021, pp. 625-644. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42254-021-00348-9.
Profiles