Open Access
Open access
volume 5 issue 1 publication number 17319

Isolation of exosomes by differential centrifugation: Theoretical analysis of a commonly used protocol

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2015-11-30
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR0.874
CiteScore6.7
Impact factor3.9
ISSN20452322
PubMed ID:  26616523
Multidisciplinary
Abstract

Exosomes, small (40–100 nm) extracellular membranous vesicles, attract enormous research interest because they are carriers of disease markers and a prospective delivery system for therapeutic agents. Differential centrifugation, the prevalent method of exosome isolation, frequently produces dissimilar and improper results because of the faulty practice of using a common centrifugation protocol with different rotors. Moreover, as recommended by suppliers, adjusting the centrifugation duration according to rotor K-factors does not work for “fixed-angle” rotors. For both types of rotors – “swinging bucket” and “fixed-angle” – we express the theoretically expected proportion of pelleted vesicles of a given size and the “cut-off” size of completely sedimented vesicles as dependent on the centrifugation force and duration and the sedimentation path-lengths. The proper centrifugation conditions can be selected using relatively simple theoretical estimates of the “cut-off” sizes of vesicles. Experimental verification on exosomes isolated from HT29 cell culture supernatant confirmed the main theoretical statements. Measured by the nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) technique, the concentration and size distribution of the vesicles after centrifugation agree with those theoretically expected. To simplify this “cut-off”-size-based adjustment of centrifugation protocol for any rotor, we developed a web-calculator.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
33 publications, 5.95%
Cells
14 publications, 2.52%
Scientific Reports
13 publications, 2.34%
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
10 publications, 1.8%
Pharmaceutics
9 publications, 1.62%
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
9 publications, 1.62%
Methods in Molecular Biology
9 publications, 1.62%
PLoS ONE
8 publications, 1.44%
Cancers
7 publications, 1.26%
Lab on a Chip
7 publications, 1.26%
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
6 publications, 1.08%
Analytical Chemistry
6 publications, 1.08%
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
5 publications, 0.9%
Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.9%
Journal of Controlled Release
5 publications, 0.9%
Small
5 publications, 0.9%
International Journal of Nanomedicine
5 publications, 0.9%
Life
4 publications, 0.72%
Tissue and Cell
4 publications, 0.72%
Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
4 publications, 0.72%
Frontiers in Immunology
3 publications, 0.54%
Frontiers in Pharmacology
3 publications, 0.54%
Life Sciences
3 publications, 0.54%
Molecular Cancer
3 publications, 0.54%
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
3 publications, 0.54%
Advanced Science
3 publications, 0.54%
ACS Nano
3 publications, 0.54%
ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering
3 publications, 0.54%
Biomaterials Science
3 publications, 0.54%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35

Publishers

20
40
60
80
100
120
MDPI
107 publications, 19.28%
Elsevier
107 publications, 19.28%
Springer Nature
94 publications, 16.94%
Wiley
52 publications, 9.37%
Frontiers Media S.A.
35 publications, 6.31%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
27 publications, 4.86%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
22 publications, 3.96%
Taylor & Francis
18 publications, 3.24%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
13 publications, 2.34%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
9 publications, 1.62%
SAGE
6 publications, 1.08%
Oxford University Press
5 publications, 0.9%
Mary Ann Liebert
4 publications, 0.72%
Hindawi Limited
4 publications, 0.72%
IntechOpen
3 publications, 0.54%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
3 publications, 0.54%
OAE Publishing Inc.
3 publications, 0.54%
S. Karger AG
2 publications, 0.36%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2 publications, 0.36%
Baishideng Publishing Group
2 publications, 0.36%
Pleiades Publishing
2 publications, 0.36%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
2 publications, 0.36%
Walter de Gruyter
2 publications, 0.36%
American Society for Microbiology
2 publications, 0.36%
AME Publishing Company
2 publications, 0.36%
IOP Publishing
2 publications, 0.36%
American Society for Clinical Investigation
1 publication, 0.18%
The Company of Biologists
1 publication, 0.18%
Impact Journals
1 publication, 0.18%
20
40
60
80
100
120
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
555
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Livshits M. A. et al. Isolation of exosomes by differential centrifugation: Theoretical analysis of a commonly used protocol // Scientific Reports. 2015. Vol. 5. No. 1. 17319
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Livshits M. A., Khomyakova E., Evtushenko E. G., Lazarev V. N., Kulemin N. A., Semina S. E., Generozov E. V., GOVORUN V. M. Isolation of exosomes by differential centrifugation: Theoretical analysis of a commonly used protocol // Scientific Reports. 2015. Vol. 5. No. 1. 17319
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1038/srep17319
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17319
TI - Isolation of exosomes by differential centrifugation: Theoretical analysis of a commonly used protocol
T2 - Scientific Reports
AU - Livshits, Mikhail A
AU - Khomyakova, Elena
AU - Evtushenko, Evgeniy G
AU - Lazarev, Vassili N.
AU - Kulemin, Nikolay A.
AU - Semina, Svetlana E
AU - Generozov, Edward V.
AU - GOVORUN, VADIM M.
PY - 2015
DA - 2015/11/30
PB - Springer Nature
IS - 1
VL - 5
PMID - 26616523
SN - 2045-2322
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2015_Livshits,
author = {Mikhail A Livshits and Elena Khomyakova and Evgeniy G Evtushenko and Vassili N. Lazarev and Nikolay A. Kulemin and Svetlana E Semina and Edward V. Generozov and VADIM M. GOVORUN},
title = {Isolation of exosomes by differential centrifugation: Theoretical analysis of a commonly used protocol},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2015},
volume = {5},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17319},
number = {1},
pages = {17319},
doi = {10.1038/srep17319}
}