Memory and modularity in cell-fate decision making
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2013-11-19
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 18.288
CiteScore: 78.1
Impact factor: 48.5
ISSN: 00280836, 14764687
PubMed ID:
24256735
Multidisciplinary
Abstract
Genetically identical cells sharing an environment can display markedly different phenotypes. It is often unclear how much of this variation derives from chance, external signals, or attempts by individual cells to exert autonomous phenotypic programs. By observing thousands of cells for hundreds of consecutive generations under constant conditions, we dissect the stochastic decision between a solitary, motile state and a chained, sessile state in Bacillus subtilis. We show that the motile state is ‘memoryless’, exhibiting no autonomous control over the time spent in the state. In contrast, the time spent as connected chains of cells is tightly controlled, enforcing coordination among related cells in the multicellular state. We show that the three-protein regulatory circuit governing the decision is modular, as initiation and maintenance of chaining are genetically separable functions. As stimulation of the same initiating pathway triggers biofilm formation, we argue that autonomous timing allows a trial commitment to multicellularity that external signals could extend. This study shows that Bacillus subtilis switches from a solitary, motile lifestyle to a multicellular, sessile state in a random, memoryless fashion, but that the underlying gene network is buffered against its own stochastic variation to tightly time the reverse transition; thus bacteria keep track of time to force their progeny to cooperate during the earliest stage of multicellular growth. Genetically identical cells can make different cell-fate decisions in response to explicit extracellular triggers but also as a reaction to apparently stochastic or randomly generated stimuli arising within the cell. Is the underlying noise in gene expression a 'bug' or a key part of the cellular program? This study, a joint project from the labs of Richard Losick and Johan Paulsson, shows that chance has a role, at least for Bacillus subtilis bacteria. B. subtilis cells face a dramatic cell-fate decision, the transition between the solitary, motile state and the multicellular, chained state. The authors find that the bacterium switches from solitary to multicellular states according to a random, memoryless molecular mechanism, but that the underlying gene network is buffered against its own stochastic variations for the reverse transition. Thus bacteria keep track of time in order to force their progeny to cooperate with each other — a process that may inspire similarly quantitative research on development and cancer.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
|
|
Nature Communications
8 publications, 3.19%
|
|
|
PLoS Computational Biology
7 publications, 2.79%
|
|
|
eLife
6 publications, 2.39%
|
|
|
Journal of Molecular Biology
5 publications, 1.99%
|
|
|
Current Opinion in Microbiology
5 publications, 1.99%
|
|
|
Science advances
5 publications, 1.99%
|
|
|
mBio
5 publications, 1.99%
|
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology
5 publications, 1.99%
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
4 publications, 1.59%
|
|
|
Cell Systems
4 publications, 1.59%
|
|
|
Biophysical Journal
4 publications, 1.59%
|
|
|
Molecular Microbiology
4 publications, 1.59%
|
|
|
Methods in Molecular Biology
4 publications, 1.59%
|
|
|
Science
4 publications, 1.59%
|
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
4 publications, 1.59%
|
|
|
Physical Review E
4 publications, 1.59%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Microbiology
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Physical Review Letters
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Nature
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
FEMS Microbiology Reviews
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Microbiology spectrum
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
mSystems
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Nature Protocols
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Reports on Progress in Physics
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
PLoS Genetics
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
PLoS Biology
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
Publishers
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
|
Elsevier
44 publications, 17.53%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
41 publications, 16.33%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
38 publications, 15.14%
|
|
|
Wiley
18 publications, 7.17%
|
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
15 publications, 5.98%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
12 publications, 4.78%
|
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
10 publications, 3.98%
|
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
9 publications, 3.59%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
7 publications, 2.79%
|
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
6 publications, 2.39%
|
|
|
MDPI
5 publications, 1.99%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
5 publications, 1.99%
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
4 publications, 1.59%
|
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
4 publications, 1.59%
|
|
|
Annual Reviews
4 publications, 1.59%
|
|
|
The Royal Society
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
IOP Publishing
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
European Molecular Biology Organization
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
AIP Publishing
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
Portland Press
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
251
Total citations:
251
Citations from 2024:
45
(17.93%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Norman T. M. et al. Memory and modularity in cell-fate decision making // Nature. 2013. Vol. 503. No. 7477. pp. 481-486.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Norman T. M., Lord N. D., Paulsson J., Losick R. Memory and modularity in cell-fate decision making // Nature. 2013. Vol. 503. No. 7477. pp. 481-486.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1038/nature12804
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12804
TI - Memory and modularity in cell-fate decision making
T2 - Nature
AU - Norman, Thomas M.
AU - Lord, Nathan D
AU - Paulsson, Johan
AU - Losick, Richard
PY - 2013
DA - 2013/11/19
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 481-486
IS - 7477
VL - 503
PMID - 24256735
SN - 0028-0836
SN - 1476-4687
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2013_Norman,
author = {Thomas M. Norman and Nathan D Lord and Johan Paulsson and Richard Losick},
title = {Memory and modularity in cell-fate decision making},
journal = {Nature},
year = {2013},
volume = {503},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12804},
number = {7477},
pages = {481--486},
doi = {10.1038/nature12804}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Norman, Thomas M., et al. “Memory and modularity in cell-fate decision making.” Nature, vol. 503, no. 7477, Nov. 2013, pp. 481-486. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12804.