volume 2 issue 3 pages 201-213

The mechanisms of nanoparticle delivery to solid tumours

Luan N. M. Nguyen 1, 2
Wayne Ngo 1, 2, 3, 4
Zachary P Lin 1, 2
Shrey Sindhwani 1, 2, 5
Presley Macmillan 2, 6
Stefan M Mladjenovic 1, 2
Warren CW Chan 1, 2, 6, 7, 8
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-02-08
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR7.993
CiteScore20.0
Impact factor37.6
ISSN27316092
Abstract
Nanoparticles for the detection and treatment of cancer have suffered from limited clinical translation. A key problem has been the lack of understanding of the mechanisms of nanoparticle delivery to solid tumours. The current delivery mechanism is called the enhanced permeability and retention effect, which states that nanoparticles passively enter the tumour through gaps between endothelial cells and are retained because of poor lymphatic drainage. However, nanoparticles designed according to the enhanced permeability and retention effect have limited delivery to solid tumours. An alternative mechanism proposes that nanoparticles enter the tumour through active endothelial transport processes, are retained in the tumour due to interactions with tumour components and exit the tumour through lymphatic vessels. This mechanism is called the active transport and retention principle. In this Review, we explore the contrasting views of these two mechanisms of nanoparticle delivery to solid tumours, explaining the underlying biological mechanisms and their effect on nanoparticle design for cancer applications. Defining the nanoparticle delivery mechanisms to solid tumours is crucial to the advancement and clinical translation of cancer nanomedicines and to determining how nanoparticles should be engineered for medical use. The mechanisms of nanoparticle delivery to solid tumours guide the engineering of nanoparticles for cancer applications. This Review discusses two contrasting nanoparticle delivery mechanisms, the enhanced permeability and retention effect and the active transport and retention principle, and their implications for the design of cancer nanomedicines.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Journal of Controlled Release
8 publications, 5.33%
ACS Nano
7 publications, 4.67%
Nature Reviews Bioengineering
5 publications, 3.33%
Drug Delivery and Translational Research
4 publications, 2.67%
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
4 publications, 2.67%
Advanced Materials
3 publications, 2%
Pharmaceutics
3 publications, 2%
ACS applied materials & interfaces
3 publications, 2%
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
3 publications, 2%
Advanced NanoBiomed Research
3 publications, 2%
Small
3 publications, 2%
Cancers
3 publications, 2%
Cell Biomaterials
3 publications, 2%
Angewandte Chemie
3 publications, 2%
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
3 publications, 2%
Chemical Engineering Journal
2 publications, 1.33%
Nature Nanotechnology
2 publications, 1.33%
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
2 publications, 1.33%
Nano Today
2 publications, 1.33%
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
2 publications, 1.33%
Molecular Cancer
2 publications, 1.33%
Nature Communications
2 publications, 1.33%
Advanced healthcare materials
2 publications, 1.33%
Langmuir
2 publications, 1.33%
Science advances
2 publications, 1.33%
Pharmacological Research
2 publications, 1.33%
Biomaterials Advances
2 publications, 1.33%
Advanced Science
2 publications, 1.33%
Applied Physics Reviews
2 publications, 1.33%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Elsevier
46 publications, 30.67%
Springer Nature
30 publications, 20%
Wiley
28 publications, 18.67%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
18 publications, 12%
MDPI
7 publications, 4.67%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
6 publications, 4%
Taylor & Francis
2 publications, 1.33%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
2 publications, 1.33%
AIP Publishing
2 publications, 1.33%
SAGE
1 publication, 0.67%
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 0.67%
Beilstein-Institut
1 publication, 0.67%
Annual Reviews
1 publication, 0.67%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 publication, 0.67%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 0.67%
Shaheed Behesti University of Medical Sciences and Health
1 publication, 0.67%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 0.67%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1 publication, 0.67%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
153
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Nguyen L. N. M. et al. The mechanisms of nanoparticle delivery to solid tumours // Nature Reviews Bioengineering. 2024. Vol. 2. No. 3. pp. 201-213.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Nguyen L. N. M., Ngo W., Lin Z. P., Sindhwani S., Macmillan P., Mladjenovic S. M., Chan W. C. The mechanisms of nanoparticle delivery to solid tumours // Nature Reviews Bioengineering. 2024. Vol. 2. No. 3. pp. 201-213.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1038/s44222-024-00154-9
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-024-00154-9
TI - The mechanisms of nanoparticle delivery to solid tumours
T2 - Nature Reviews Bioengineering
AU - Nguyen, Luan N. M.
AU - Ngo, Wayne
AU - Lin, Zachary P
AU - Sindhwani, Shrey
AU - Macmillan, Presley
AU - Mladjenovic, Stefan M
AU - Chan, Warren CW
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/02/08
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 201-213
IS - 3
VL - 2
SN - 2731-6092
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2024_Nguyen,
author = {Luan N. M. Nguyen and Wayne Ngo and Zachary P Lin and Shrey Sindhwani and Presley Macmillan and Stefan M Mladjenovic and Warren CW Chan},
title = {The mechanisms of nanoparticle delivery to solid tumours},
journal = {Nature Reviews Bioengineering},
year = {2024},
volume = {2},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {feb},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-024-00154-9},
number = {3},
pages = {201--213},
doi = {10.1038/s44222-024-00154-9}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Nguyen, Luan N. M., et al. “The mechanisms of nanoparticle delivery to solid tumours.” Nature Reviews Bioengineering, vol. 2, no. 3, Feb. 2024, pp. 201-213. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-024-00154-9.