volume 145 issue 14 pages 4991-5003

Aptamers vs. antibodies as capture probes in optical porous silicon biosensors

Sofia Arshavsky Graham 1, 2
Sofia Arshavsky-Graham 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Katharina Urmann 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Rachel Salama 2, 7, 8, 9, 10
N Massad Ivanir 2
Naama Massad-Ivanir 7, 8, 9, 10
Johanna G. Walter 1
Johanna-Gabriela Walter 3, 4, 5, 6
Thomas Scheper 1
Ester Segal 2, 7, 8, 9, 10
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2020-06-04
scimago Q2
wos Q2
SJR0.617
CiteScore7.0
Impact factor3.3
ISSN00032654, 13645528, 07417918
PubMed ID:  32519701
Biochemistry
Spectroscopy
Analytical Chemistry
Electrochemistry
Environmental Chemistry
Abstract
Over the past decade aptamers have emerged as a promising class of bioreceptors for biosensing applications with significant advantages over conventional antibodies. However, experimental studies comparing aptasensors and immunosensors, under equivalent conditions, are limited and the results are inconclusive, in terms of benefits and limitations of each bioreceptor type. In the present work, the performance of aptamer and antibody bioreceptors for the detection of a his-tagged protein, used as a model target, is compared. The bioreceptors are immobilized onto a nanostructured porous silicon (PSi) thin film, used as the optical transducer, and the target protein is detected in a real-time and label-free format by reflective interferometric Fourier transform spectroscopy. For the antibodies, random-oriented immobilization onto the PSi nanostructure results in a poor biosensing performance. Contrary, Fc-oriented immobilization of the antibodies shows a similar biosensing performance to that exhibited by the aptamer-based biosensor, in terms of binding rate, dynamic detection range, limit of detection and selectivity. The aptasensor outperforms in terms of its reusability and storability, while the immunosensor could not be regenerated for subsequent experiments.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
Biosensors
4 publications, 4.12%
Chemosensors
4 publications, 4.12%
Microchimica Acta
3 publications, 3.09%
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
3 publications, 3.09%
Talanta
3 publications, 3.09%
TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry
3 publications, 3.09%
ACS applied materials & interfaces
3 publications, 3.09%
Sensors
2 publications, 2.06%
Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical
2 publications, 2.06%
Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
2 publications, 2.06%
Analytical Biochemistry
2 publications, 2.06%
Microchemical Journal
2 publications, 2.06%
Analytical Chemistry
2 publications, 2.06%
The Analyst
2 publications, 2.06%
Applied Physics Reviews
1 publication, 1.03%
Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
1 publication, 1.03%
Micromachines
1 publication, 1.03%
Polymers
1 publication, 1.03%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
1 publication, 1.03%
Silicon
1 publication, 1.03%
Nano-Micro Letters
1 publication, 1.03%
Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry
1 publication, 1.03%
Heliyon
1 publication, 1.03%
Environmental International
1 publication, 1.03%
Process Biochemistry
1 publication, 1.03%
ACS Materials Letters
1 publication, 1.03%
Sensors and Actuators Reports
1 publication, 1.03%
Biomaterials Research
1 publication, 1.03%
Engineering in Life Sciences
1 publication, 1.03%
1
2
3
4

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Elsevier
31 publications, 31.96%
Springer Nature
16 publications, 16.49%
MDPI
14 publications, 14.43%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
11 publications, 11.34%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
7 publications, 7.22%
Wiley
3 publications, 3.09%
Taylor & Francis
3 publications, 3.09%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
3 publications, 3.09%
IOP Publishing
2 publications, 2.06%
AIP Publishing
1 publication, 1.03%
Mary Ann Liebert
1 publication, 1.03%
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 1.03%
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 1.03%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 1.03%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
97
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Arshavsky Graham S. et al. Aptamers vs. antibodies as capture probes in optical porous silicon biosensors // The Analyst. 2020. Vol. 145. No. 14. pp. 4991-5003.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Arshavsky Graham S., Arshavsky-Graham S., Urmann K., Salama R., Massad Ivanir N., Massad-Ivanir N., Walter J. G., Walter J., Scheper T., Segal E. Aptamers vs. antibodies as capture probes in optical porous silicon biosensors // The Analyst. 2020. Vol. 145. No. 14. pp. 4991-5003.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1039/d0an00178c
UR - https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D0AN00178C
TI - Aptamers vs. antibodies as capture probes in optical porous silicon biosensors
T2 - The Analyst
AU - Arshavsky Graham, Sofia
AU - Arshavsky-Graham, Sofia
AU - Urmann, Katharina
AU - Salama, Rachel
AU - Massad Ivanir, N
AU - Massad-Ivanir, Naama
AU - Walter, Johanna G.
AU - Walter, Johanna-Gabriela
AU - Scheper, Thomas
AU - Segal, Ester
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/06/04
PB - Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
SP - 4991-5003
IS - 14
VL - 145
PMID - 32519701
SN - 0003-2654
SN - 1364-5528
SN - 0741-7918
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2020_Arshavsky Graham,
author = {Sofia Arshavsky Graham and Sofia Arshavsky-Graham and Katharina Urmann and Rachel Salama and N Massad Ivanir and Naama Massad-Ivanir and Johanna G. Walter and Johanna-Gabriela Walter and Thomas Scheper and Ester Segal},
title = {Aptamers vs. antibodies as capture probes in optical porous silicon biosensors},
journal = {The Analyst},
year = {2020},
volume = {145},
publisher = {Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)},
month = {jun},
url = {https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D0AN00178C},
number = {14},
pages = {4991--5003},
doi = {10.1039/d0an00178c}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Arshavsky Graham, Sofia, et al. “Aptamers vs. antibodies as capture probes in optical porous silicon biosensors.” The Analyst, vol. 145, no. 14, Jun. 2020, pp. 4991-5003. https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D0AN00178C.