Chemical Communications

, volume 58 , issue 63 , pages 8866-8869

Highly efficient lithium adsorption and stable isotope separation by metal–organic frameworks

Bo Tong ^{1, 2, 3}

Guijie Guo ^{1, 2, 3}

Xiangyunxiu Meng ^{1, 2, 3}

Peng Bai ^{1, 2, 3}

Jiafei Lyu ^{1, 2, 3}

Xianghai Guo ^{4, 5}

Hide authors affiliations Show authors affiliations: 5 affiliations

Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, P. R. China |

Key Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering (Ministry of Education), Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, P. R. China |

Key Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering (Ministry of Education), Tianjin University, Tianjin, P. R. China |

⁴

School of Marine Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, P. R. China |

⁵

Key Laboratory of Ocean Observation Technology of Ministry of Natural Resources, School of Marine Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, P. R. China |

Publication type: Journal Article

Publication date: 2022-07-13

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Chemical Communications

scimago Q1

wos Q2

SJR: 1.037

CiteScore: 7.4

Impact factor: 4.2

ISSN: 13597345, 1364548X

DOI: 10.1039/d2cc02421g

Copy DOI

PubMed ID: 35856683

Materials Chemistry

Metals and Alloys

Surfaces, Coatings and Films

General Chemistry

Ceramics and Composites

Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

Catalysis

Abstract

The effects of a series of MOFs on the adsorption and separation of lithium isotopes were investigated in this paper. Seven kinds of MOF were prepared, and the characterization studies of MIL-100(Fe) before and after adsorption by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) demonstrated the potential chemical interaction between Fe and Li. The influence of metal ions, counter-ions and solvents on the adsorption capacity and separation factor was investigated. The maximum separation factor can reach 1.048 ± 0.001. MIL-100(Fe) also has good regeneration performance.

Found

Top-30

Journals

	1 2 3 4
Separation and Purification Technology	Separation and Purification Technology, 4, 25% Separation and Purification Technology 4 publications, 25%
Chemical Engineering Journal	Chemical Engineering Journal, 2, 12.5% Chemical Engineering Journal 2 publications, 12.5%
ACS applied materials & interfaces	ACS applied materials & interfaces, 1, 6.25% ACS applied materials & interfaces 1 publication, 6.25%
Nano Research	Nano Research, 1, 6.25% Nano Research 1 publication, 6.25%
ACS Applied Engineering Materials	ACS Applied Engineering Materials, 1, 6.25% ACS Applied Engineering Materials 1 publication, 6.25%
Green Energy and Environment	Green Energy and Environment, 1, 6.25% Green Energy and Environment 1 publication, 6.25%
Chemical Communications	Chemical Communications, 1, 6.25% Chemical Communications 1 publication, 6.25%
Advanced Functional Materials	Advanced Functional Materials, 1, 6.25% Advanced Functional Materials 1 publication, 6.25%
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering	Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 1, 6.25% Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 1 publication, 6.25%
Desalination	Desalination, 1, 6.25% Desalination 1 publication, 6.25%
Inorganic Chemistry Communication	Inorganic Chemistry Communication, 1, 6.25% Inorganic Chemistry Communication 1 publication, 6.25%
Next Materials	Next Materials, 1, 6.25% Next Materials 1 publication, 6.25%
	1 2 3 4

Publishers

	2 4 6 8 10 12
Elsevier	Elsevier, 11, 68.75% Elsevier 11 publications, 68.75%
American Chemical Society (ACS)	American Chemical Society (ACS), 2, 12.5% American Chemical Society (ACS) 2 publications, 12.5%
Springer Nature	Springer Nature, 1, 6.25% Springer Nature 1 publication, 6.25%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)	Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), 1, 6.25% Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) 1 publication, 6.25%
Wiley	Wiley, 1, 6.25% Wiley 1 publication, 6.25%
	2 4 6 8 10 12

We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.

Metrics

Cite this

GOST |

Cite this

GOST Copy

Tong B. et al. Highly efficient lithium adsorption and stable isotope separation by metal–organic frameworks // Chemical Communications. 2022. Vol. 58. No. 63. pp. 8866-8869.

GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy

Tong B., Guo G., Meng X., Bai P., Lyu J., Guo X. Highly efficient lithium adsorption and stable isotope separation by metal–organic frameworks // Chemical Communications. 2022. Vol. 58. No. 63. pp. 8866-8869.

RIS |

Cite this

RIS Copy

TY - JOUR

DO - 10.1039/d2cc02421g

UR - https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D2CC02421G

TI - Highly efficient lithium adsorption and stable isotope separation by metal–organic frameworks

T2 - Chemical Communications

AU - Tong, Bo

AU - Guo, Guijie

AU - Meng, Xiangyunxiu

AU - Bai, Peng

AU - Lyu, Jiafei

AU - Guo, Xianghai

PY - 2022

DA - 2022/07/13

PB - Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

SP - 8866-8869

IS - 63

VL - 58

PMID - 35856683

SN - 1359-7345

SN - 1364-548X

ER -

BibTex |

Cite this

BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy

@article{2022_Tong,

author = {Bo Tong and Guijie Guo and Xiangyunxiu Meng and Peng Bai and Jiafei Lyu and Xianghai Guo},

title = {Highly efficient lithium adsorption and stable isotope separation by metal–organic frameworks},

journal = {Chemical Communications},

year = {2022},

volume = {58},

publisher = {Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)},

month = {jul},

url = {https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D2CC02421G},

number = {63},

pages = {8866--8869},

doi = {10.1039/d2cc02421g}

}

MLA

Cite this

MLA Copy

Tong, Bo, et al. “Highly efficient lithium adsorption and stable isotope separation by metal–organic frameworks.” Chemical Communications, vol. 58, no. 63, Jul. 2022, pp. 8866-8869. https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D2CC02421G.

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Journal

Chemical Communications

scimago Q1

wos Q2

SJR

1.037

CiteScore

7.4

Impact factor

4.2

ISSN

13597345 (Print)

1364548X (Electronic)

Profiles

Jiafei Lyu