Open Access
Open access
volume 89 issue S1 pages 60

Six of the Best, General 20

D. G. ROSS 1
C A Harris 1
D. J. JONES 1
1
 
Department of Surgery, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2002-01-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.690
CiteScore7.7
Impact factor8.8
ISSN00071323, 13652168
Abstract
Aims: To compare the operative activity of two first-year basic surgical trainees working in comparable district general hospitals in 1992 and 2000. Methods: Prospectively collected operating log-book data was compared for the first 15 months of general surgical training of a BST in 1992 to that of a similar trainee in 2000. Both elective and emergency cases were analysed. The surgical speciality and the trainees' role in the case were recorded. Several index operations were also compared. Results: Emergency case numbers were similar (145 in 1992 and 133 in 2000), however, the elective workload was almost halved (435 in 1992 and 225 in 2000). The trainee in 1992 assisted, was supervised and performed more operations, in all grades of procedure, than the trainee in 2000 (Table 1), as a result the trainee in 2000 spent the majority of his time assisting cases but the trainee in 1992 had moved on to be the principal operator. The trainee in 1992 had a greater exposure to most surgical subspecialties than the trainee in 2000 (Table 2). In all index procedures (appendicectomy, varicose veins, hernia and upper GI endoscopy), the 1992 trainee did appreciably more. Conclusions: The emergency workload was similar, however, the elective workload was reduced by 48 per cent, resulting in a reduction in the training available to the 2000 trainee. Training in 1992 was more ‘general’ compared to 2000.
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
Pediatric Surgery International
2 publications, 16.67%
Operative Neurosurgery
1 publication, 8.33%
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
1 publication, 8.33%
Scottish Medical Journal
1 publication, 8.33%
World Journal of Surgery
1 publication, 8.33%
European Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
1 publication, 8.33%
BMC Medical Education
1 publication, 8.33%
American Journal of Surgery
1 publication, 8.33%
Best Practice and Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
1 publication, 8.33%
Bulletin of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
1 publication, 8.33%
Indian Journal of Neurosurgery
1 publication, 8.33%
1
2

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
Springer Nature
5 publications, 41.67%
Elsevier
2 publications, 16.67%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 8.33%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1 publication, 8.33%
SAGE
1 publication, 8.33%
The Royal College of Surgeons of England
1 publication, 8.33%
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 publication, 8.33%
1
2
3
4
5
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
12
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
ROSS D. G., Harris C. A., JONES D. J. Six of the Best, General 20 // British Journal of Surgery. 2002. Vol. 89. No. S1. p. 60.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
ROSS D. G., Harris C. A., JONES D. J. Six of the Best, General 20 // British Journal of Surgery. 2002. Vol. 89. No. S1. p. 60.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2168.89.s.1.17_2.x
UR - https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.89.s.1.17_2.x
TI - Six of the Best, General 20
T2 - British Journal of Surgery
AU - ROSS, D. G.
AU - Harris, C A
AU - JONES, D. J.
PY - 2002
DA - 2002/01/01
PB - Wiley
SP - 60
IS - S1
VL - 89
SN - 0007-1323
SN - 1365-2168
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2002_ROSS,
author = {D. G. ROSS and C A Harris and D. J. JONES},
title = {Six of the Best, General 20},
journal = {British Journal of Surgery},
year = {2002},
volume = {89},
publisher = {Wiley},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.89.s.1.17_2.x},
number = {S1},
pages = {60},
doi = {10.1046/j.1365-2168.89.s.1.17_2.x}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
ROSS, D. G., et al. “Six of the Best, General 20.” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 89, no. S1, Jan. 2002, p. 60. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.89.s.1.17_2.x.