New England Journal of Medicine, volume 356, issue 3, pages 227-236

Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer

Norman F. Boyd 1
Jennifer M. Stone 2
1
 
Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada,
2
 
Centre for Genetic Origins of Health and Diseases
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2007-01-17
scimago Q1
SJR20.544
CiteScore145.4
Impact factor96.2
ISSN00284793, 15334406
PubMed ID:  17229950
General Medicine
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extensive mammographic density is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer and makes the detection of cancer by mammography difficult, but the influence of density on risk according to method of cancer detection is unknown. METHODS We carried out three nested case-control studies in screened populations with 1112 matched case-control pairs. We examined the association of the measured percentage of density in the baseline mammogram with risk of breast cancer, according to method of cancer detection, time since the initiation of screening, and age. RESULTS As compared with women with density in less than 10% of the mammogram, women with density in 75% or more had an increased risk of breast cancer (odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0 to 7.4), whether detected by screening (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.0 to 6.2) or less than 12 months after a negative screening examination (odds ratio, 17.8; 95% CI, 4.8 to 65.9). Increased risk of breast cancer, whether detected by screening or other means, persisted for at least 8 years after study entry and was greater in younger than in older women. For women younger than the median age of 56 years, 26% of all breast cancers and 50% of cancers detected less than 12 months after a negative screening test were attributable to density in 50% or more of the mammogram. CONCLUSIONS Extensive mammographic density is strongly associated with the risk of breast cancer detected by screening or between screening tests. A substantial fraction of breast cancers can be attributed to this risk factor.

Top-30

Journals

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80

Publishers

50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?