New England Journal of Medicine, volume 356, issue 3, pages 227-236
Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer
Norman F. Boyd
1
,
Jennifer M. Stone
2
1
Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada,
|
2
Centre for Genetic Origins of Health and Diseases
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2007-01-17
Journal:
New England Journal of Medicine
scimago Q1
SJR: 20.544
CiteScore: 145.4
Impact factor: 96.2
ISSN: 00284793, 15334406
PubMed ID:
17229950
General Medicine
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Extensive mammographic density is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer and makes the detection of cancer by mammography difficult, but the influence of density on risk according to method of cancer detection is unknown.
METHODS
We carried out three nested case-control studies in screened populations with 1112 matched case-control pairs. We examined the association of the measured percentage of density in the baseline mammogram with risk of breast cancer, according to method of cancer detection, time since the initiation of screening, and age.
RESULTS
As compared with women with density in less than 10% of the mammogram, women with density in 75% or more had an increased risk of breast cancer (odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0 to 7.4), whether detected by screening (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.0 to 6.2) or less than 12 months after a negative screening examination (odds ratio, 17.8; 95% CI, 4.8 to 65.9). Increased risk of breast cancer, whether detected by screening or other means, persisted for at least 8 years after study entry and was greater in younger than in older women. For women younger than the median age of 56 years, 26% of all breast cancers and 50% of cancers detected less than 12 months after a negative screening test were attributable to density in 50% or more of the mammogram.
CONCLUSIONS
Extensive mammographic density is strongly associated with the risk of breast cancer detected by screening or between screening tests. A substantial fraction of breast cancers can be attributed to this risk factor.
Top-30
Journals
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
Breast Cancer Research
80 publications, 4.26%
|
|
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
64 publications, 3.41%
|
|
Medical Physics
58 publications, 3.09%
|
|
Radiology
50 publications, 2.66%
|
|
American Journal of Roentgenology
40 publications, 2.13%
|
|
Academic Radiology
38 publications, 2.02%
|
|
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
32 publications, 1.7%
|
|
European Radiology
31 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
28 publications, 1.49%
|
|
International Journal of Cancer
25 publications, 1.33%
|
|
BMC Cancer
23 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
23 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Physics in Medicine and Biology
20 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
20 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Cancers
18 publications, 0.96%
|
|
European Journal of Radiology
18 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Breast Journal
18 publications, 0.96%
|
|
British Journal of Radiology
17 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Journal of the American College of Radiology
17 publications, 0.9%
|
|
PLoS ONE
17 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Cancer Causes and Control
16 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Journal of Breast Imaging
15 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Diagnostics
15 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Breast
15 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Frontiers in Oncology
14 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Current Breast Cancer Reports
14 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Scientific Reports
14 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Clinical Imaging
14 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Cancer Prevention Research
14 publications, 0.75%
|
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
Publishers
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
|
Springer Nature
455 publications, 24.22%
|
|
Elsevier
366 publications, 19.48%
|
|
Wiley
163 publications, 8.67%
|
|
MDPI
77 publications, 4.1%
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
64 publications, 3.41%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
59 publications, 3.14%
|
|
Oxford University Press
57 publications, 3.03%
|
|
SAGE
45 publications, 2.39%
|
|
American Roentgen Ray Society
40 publications, 2.13%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
36 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
34 publications, 1.81%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
32 publications, 1.7%
|
|
IOP Publishing
26 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
25 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
24 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
21 publications, 1.12%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
19 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
19 publications, 1.01%
|
|
British Institute of Radiology
18 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
18 publications, 0.96%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
18 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
17 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
12 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Impact Journals
11 publications, 0.59%
|
|
The Korean Society of Radiology
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
American College of Physicians
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Boyd N. F. et al. Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer // New England Journal of Medicine. 2007. Vol. 356. No. 3. pp. 227-236.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Boyd N. F., Stone J. M. Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer // New England Journal of Medicine. 2007. Vol. 356. No. 3. pp. 227-236.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa062790
UR - https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa062790
TI - Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer
T2 - New England Journal of Medicine
AU - Boyd, Norman F.
AU - Stone, Jennifer M.
PY - 2007
DA - 2007/01/17
PB - Massachusetts Medical Society
SP - 227-236
IS - 3
VL - 356
PMID - 17229950
SN - 0028-4793
SN - 1533-4406
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2007_Boyd,
author = {Norman F. Boyd and Jennifer M. Stone},
title = {Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer},
journal = {New England Journal of Medicine},
year = {2007},
volume = {356},
publisher = {Massachusetts Medical Society},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa062790},
number = {3},
pages = {227--236},
doi = {10.1056/NEJMoa062790}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Boyd, Norman F., et al. “Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer.” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 3, Jan. 2007, pp. 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa062790.
Found error?
Found error?
Publisher
Journal
scimago Q1
SJR
20.544
CiteScore
145.4
Impact factor
96.2
ISSN
00284793
15334406