American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series, pages 83-103
Chapter 5. Recent claims of human-machine parity in translation highlight core issues surrounding the human evaluation of machine translation
Devin Gilbert
1
Publication type: Book Chapter
Publication date: 2023-07-26
SJR: —
CiteScore: 0.1
Impact factor: —
ISSN: 08904111
Abstract
In 2018, the first claims of empirical backing for human-machine parity in translation (HMPT) emerged at the WMT18 Conference on Machine Translation and in a study using WMT resources. Other researchers quickly refuted these claims, pointing to a flawed human evaluation campaign. Subsequent HMPT claims at WMT19 were also empirically refuted. This chapter discusses the evolution of recommendations for human evaluation of MT stemming from these claims to HMPT and evaluates possibilities of HMPT at WMT20 in the context of these recommendations. Finally, we summarize all criteria for human evaluation of MT based on recent literature.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.