volume 49 issue 6 pages 828-850

Mere formalities: fictional normativity and normative authority

Daniel Wodak
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2019-01-01
scimago Q1
SJR0.934
CiteScore3.1
Impact factor1.7
ISSN00455091, 19110820
Philosophy
Abstract

It is commonly said that some standards, such as morality, are ‘normatively authoritative’ in a way that other standards, such as etiquette, are not; standards like etiquette are said to be ‘not really normative’. Skeptics deny the very possibility of normative authority, and take claims like ‘etiquette is not really normative’ to be either empty or confused. I offer a different route to defeat skeptics about authority: instead of focusing on what makes standards like morality special, we should focus on what makes standards like etiquette ‘not really normative’. I defend a fictionalist theory on which etiquette is ‘not really normative’ in roughly the same way that Sherlock is ‘not really a detective’, and show that fictionalism about some normative standards helps us explain the possibility of normative authority.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
Inquiry (United Kingdom)
2 publications, 4.88%
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume
2 publications, 4.88%
Australasian Journal of Philosophy
2 publications, 4.88%
Erkenntnis
2 publications, 4.88%
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
1 publication, 2.44%
Synthese
1 publication, 2.44%
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
1 publication, 2.44%
The Philosophical Review
1 publication, 2.44%
Philosophies
1 publication, 2.44%
Mind
1 publication, 2.44%
Casopis pro Pravni Vedu a Praxi
1 publication, 2.44%
Philosophical Quarterly
1 publication, 2.44%
Episteme
1 publication, 2.44%
Topoi
1 publication, 2.44%
Journal of the American Philosophical Association
1 publication, 2.44%
Journal of Ethics
1 publication, 2.44%
1
2

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
Oxford University Press
25 publications, 60.98%
Springer Nature
6 publications, 14.63%
Taylor & Francis
4 publications, 9.76%
Cambridge University Press
2 publications, 4.88%
Wiley
1 publication, 2.44%
Duke University Press
1 publication, 2.44%
MDPI
1 publication, 2.44%
Masaryk University Press
1 publication, 2.44%
5
10
15
20
25
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
41
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Wodak D. Mere formalities: fictional normativity and normative authority // Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 2019. Vol. 49. No. 6. pp. 828-850.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Wodak D. Mere formalities: fictional normativity and normative authority // Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 2019. Vol. 49. No. 6. pp. 828-850.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1080/00455091.2018.1433795
UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2018.1433795
TI - Mere formalities: fictional normativity and normative authority
T2 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy
AU - Wodak, Daniel
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/01/01
PB - Cambridge University Press
SP - 828-850
IS - 6
VL - 49
SN - 0045-5091
SN - 1911-0820
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2019_Wodak,
author = {Daniel Wodak},
title = {Mere formalities: fictional normativity and normative authority},
journal = {Canadian Journal of Philosophy},
year = {2019},
volume = {49},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2018.1433795},
number = {6},
pages = {828--850},
doi = {10.1080/00455091.2018.1433795}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Wodak, Daniel. “Mere formalities: fictional normativity and normative authority.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 49, no. 6, Jan. 2019, pp. 828-850. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2018.1433795.