Aphasiology, volume 15, issue 10-11, pages 901-911

Defining aphasia: Some theoretical and clinical implications of operating from a formal definition

Malcolm R. McNeil
Sheila R. Pratt
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2001-10-01
Journal: Aphasiology
scimago Q1
SJR0.829
CiteScore4.4
Impact factor1.5
ISSN02687038, 14645041
Neurology
Otorhinolaryngology
Linguistics and Language
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Language and Linguistics
Neurology (clinical)
LPN and LVN
Abstract
Theoretical and philosophical issues related to the need for and criteria of a formal definition of aphasia are discussed. Following a review of several definitions of aphasia and the contrast of two, a formal definition is advanced that meets the specific requirements of a scientific definition: criteria for group membership and the assumed mechanisms for these criteria. The specific criteria for group membership are discussed and the assumed mechanisms are presented. It is argued that this definition (or a well justified alternative) can serve as a first approximation to a general theory of aphasia. It is also claimed that it can inform the research consumer about important but unstated assumptions of researchers as well as provide clinical guidance.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
Aphasiology
23 publications, 20.72%
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
14 publications, 12.61%
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
8 publications, 7.21%
Journal of Communication Disorders
5 publications, 4.5%
Topics in Language Disorders
4 publications, 3.6%
Brain and Language
4 publications, 3.6%
Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics
2 publications, 1.8%
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
2 publications, 1.8%
Cortex
2 publications, 1.8%
Communication Sciences and Disorders
2 publications, 1.8%
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
2 publications, 1.8%
Speech, Language and Hearing
2 publications, 1.8%
Brain Connectivity
1 publication, 0.9%
Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation
1 publication, 0.9%
Journal of Clinical Medicine
1 publication, 0.9%
Healthcare
1 publication, 0.9%
Languages
1 publication, 0.9%
Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
1 publication, 0.9%
PLoS ONE
1 publication, 0.9%
Medicine (Barcelona)
1 publication, 0.9%
Neuropsychologia
1 publication, 0.9%
Cognition
1 publication, 0.9%
Journal of Neurolinguistics
1 publication, 0.9%
International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders
1 publication, 0.9%
Behavioral Interventions
1 publication, 0.9%
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
1 publication, 0.9%
American Journal of Audiology
1 publication, 0.9%
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
1 publication, 0.9%
Assistive Technology
1 publication, 0.9%
5
10
15
20
25

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Taylor & Francis
35 publications, 31.53%
American Speech Language Hearing Association
24 publications, 21.62%
Elsevier
18 publications, 16.22%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
6 publications, 5.41%
MDPI
6 publications, 5.41%
Springer Nature
4 publications, 3.6%
Frontiers Media S.A.
2 publications, 1.8%
Wiley
2 publications, 1.8%
The Korean Academy of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology (KASA)
2 publications, 1.8%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2 publications, 1.8%
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2 publications, 1.8%
Mary Ann Liebert
1 publication, 0.9%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.9%
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.9%
Brazilian Society of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology
1 publication, 0.9%
Associacao Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento
1 publication, 0.9%
S. Karger AG
1 publication, 0.9%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
McNeil M. R., Pratt S. R. Defining aphasia: Some theoretical and clinical implications of operating from a formal definition // Aphasiology. 2001. Vol. 15. No. 10-11. pp. 901-911.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
McNeil M. R., Pratt S. R. Defining aphasia: Some theoretical and clinical implications of operating from a formal definition // Aphasiology. 2001. Vol. 15. No. 10-11. pp. 901-911.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1080/02687040143000276
UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000276
TI - Defining aphasia: Some theoretical and clinical implications of operating from a formal definition
T2 - Aphasiology
AU - McNeil, Malcolm R.
AU - Pratt, Sheila R.
PY - 2001
DA - 2001/10/01
PB - Taylor & Francis
SP - 901-911
IS - 10-11
VL - 15
SN - 0268-7038
SN - 1464-5041
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2001_McNeil,
author = {Malcolm R. McNeil and Sheila R. Pratt},
title = {Defining aphasia: Some theoretical and clinical implications of operating from a formal definition},
journal = {Aphasiology},
year = {2001},
volume = {15},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
month = {oct},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000276},
number = {10-11},
pages = {901--911},
doi = {10.1080/02687040143000276}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
McNeil, Malcolm R., and Sheila R. Pratt. “Defining aphasia: Some theoretical and clinical implications of operating from a formal definition.” Aphasiology, vol. 15, no. 10-11, Oct. 2001, pp. 901-911. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000276.
Found error?