том 39 издание 14 страницы 1161-1183

What traditional neuropsychological assessment got wrong about mild traumatic brain injury. I: historical perspective, contemporary neuroimaging overview and neuropathology update

Тип публикацииJournal Article
Дата публикации2025-09-21
SCImago Q3
WOS Q3
БС3
SJR0.541
CiteScore2.8
Impact factor1.5
ISSN02699052, 1362301X
Для доступа к списку цитирований публикации необходимо авторизоваться.

Топ-30

Журналы

1
Cureus
1 публикация, 16.67%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
1 публикация, 16.67%
medRxiv
1 публикация, 16.67%
Brain Communications
1 публикация, 16.67%
Surgical Neurology International
1 публикация, 16.67%
Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research
1 публикация, 16.67%
1

Издатели

1
Springer Nature
1 публикация, 16.67%
MDPI
1 публикация, 16.67%
openRxiv
1 публикация, 16.67%
Oxford University Press
1 публикация, 16.67%
Scientific Scholar
1 публикация, 16.67%
Elsevier
1 публикация, 16.67%
1
  • Мы не учитываем публикации, у которых нет DOI.
  • Статистика публикаций обновляется еженедельно.

Вы ученый?

Создайте профиль, чтобы получать персональные рекомендации коллег, конференций и новых статей.
 Войти с ORCID
Метрики
6
Поделиться
Цитировать
ГОСТ |
Цитировать
Bigler E. D. et al. What traditional neuropsychological assessment got wrong about mild traumatic brain injury. I: historical perspective, contemporary neuroimaging overview and neuropathology update // Brain Injury. 2025. Vol. 39. No. 14. pp. 1161-1183.
ГОСТ со всеми авторами (до 50) Скопировать
Bigler E. D., Allder S., Dunkley B. T., Victoroff J. What traditional neuropsychological assessment got wrong about mild traumatic brain injury. I: historical perspective, contemporary neuroimaging overview and neuropathology update // Brain Injury. 2025. Vol. 39. No. 14. pp. 1161-1183.
RIS |
Цитировать
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1080/02699052.2025.2551162
UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02699052.2025.2551162
TI - What traditional neuropsychological assessment got wrong about mild traumatic brain injury. I: historical perspective, contemporary neuroimaging overview and neuropathology update
T2 - Brain Injury
AU - Bigler, Erin David
AU - Allder, Steven
AU - Dunkley, Benjamin T.
AU - Victoroff, Jeff
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/09/21
PB - Taylor & Francis
SP - 1161-1183
IS - 14
VL - 39
SN - 0269-9052
SN - 1362-301X
ER -
BibTex |
Цитировать
BibTex (до 50 авторов) Скопировать
@article{2025_Bigler,
author = {Erin David Bigler and Steven Allder and Benjamin T. Dunkley and Jeff Victoroff},
title = {What traditional neuropsychological assessment got wrong about mild traumatic brain injury. I: historical perspective, contemporary neuroimaging overview and neuropathology update},
journal = {Brain Injury},
year = {2025},
volume = {39},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
month = {sep},
url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02699052.2025.2551162},
number = {14},
pages = {1161--1183},
doi = {10.1080/02699052.2025.2551162}
}
MLA
Цитировать
Bigler, Erin David, et al. “What traditional neuropsychological assessment got wrong about mild traumatic brain injury. I: historical perspective, contemporary neuroimaging overview and neuropathology update.” Brain Injury, vol. 39, no. 14, Sep. 2025, pp. 1161-1183. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02699052.2025.2551162.
Ошибка в публикации?