Open Access
Open access
volume 41 issue 3-4 pages 1-6

Effect of regional vs general anesthesia on vital functions after cesarean section: a single center experience

Danka Mostic Stanisic 1, 2
Nevena Kalezic 3, 4
Nina Rajovic 5
Tatjana Ilic-Mostic 4
Jelena Cumic 6
Tamara Stanisavljevic 3
Aleksandra Beleslin 2
Jelena Stulic 7
Ivana Rudic 7
Nevena Divac 8
Natasa Milic 5, 9
Radan Stojanovic 8
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-09-16
scimago Q2
wos Q2
SJR0.522
CiteScore2.8
Impact factor2.1
ISSN10641955, 15256065
Internal Medicine
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Abstract
The aim was to determine the effect of regional anesthesia (RA) on postoperative vital functions in contrast to general endotracheal anesthesia (GEA) after the cesarean section.Prospective cohort study included consecutive term pregnant women delivered by cesarean section (GEA, n = 284; RA, n = 249).Higher levels of blood pressure and heart rate, as well as lower levels of pulse oximetry were found for GEA in contrast to RA (p < 0.001). The application of RA presented less side-effects (p < 0.05).RA for cesarean section should be preferred when balancing the risks and benefits for the mother and fetus.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
Medicina
1 publication, 100%
1

Publishers

1
MDPI
1 publication, 100%
1
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
1
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Mostic Stanisic D. et al. Effect of regional vs general anesthesia on vital functions after cesarean section: a single center experience // Hypertension in Pregnancy. 2022. Vol. 41. No. 3-4. pp. 1-6.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Mostic Stanisic D., Kalezic N., Rajovic N., Ilic-Mostic T., Cumic J., Stanisavljevic T., Beleslin A., Stulic J., Rudic I., Divac N., Milic N., Stojanovic R. Effect of regional vs general anesthesia on vital functions after cesarean section: a single center experience // Hypertension in Pregnancy. 2022. Vol. 41. No. 3-4. pp. 1-6.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1080/10641955.2022.2124417
UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/10641955.2022.2124417
TI - Effect of regional vs general anesthesia on vital functions after cesarean section: a single center experience
T2 - Hypertension in Pregnancy
AU - Mostic Stanisic, Danka
AU - Kalezic, Nevena
AU - Rajovic, Nina
AU - Ilic-Mostic, Tatjana
AU - Cumic, Jelena
AU - Stanisavljevic, Tamara
AU - Beleslin, Aleksandra
AU - Stulic, Jelena
AU - Rudic, Ivana
AU - Divac, Nevena
AU - Milic, Natasa
AU - Stojanovic, Radan
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/09/16
PB - Taylor & Francis
SP - 1-6
IS - 3-4
VL - 41
PMID - 36111407
SN - 1064-1955
SN - 1525-6065
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_Mostic Stanisic,
author = {Danka Mostic Stanisic and Nevena Kalezic and Nina Rajovic and Tatjana Ilic-Mostic and Jelena Cumic and Tamara Stanisavljevic and Aleksandra Beleslin and Jelena Stulic and Ivana Rudic and Nevena Divac and Natasa Milic and Radan Stojanovic},
title = {Effect of regional vs general anesthesia on vital functions after cesarean section: a single center experience},
journal = {Hypertension in Pregnancy},
year = {2022},
volume = {41},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/10641955.2022.2124417},
number = {3-4},
pages = {1--6},
doi = {10.1080/10641955.2022.2124417}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Mostic Stanisic, Danka, et al. “Effect of regional vs general anesthesia on vital functions after cesarean section: a single center experience.” Hypertension in Pregnancy, vol. 41, no. 3-4, Sep. 2022, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641955.2022.2124417.