volume 44 issue 3 pages 217-231

Active layer monitoring in Antarctica: an overview of results from 2006 to 2015

Filip Hrbáček 1
Gonçalo Vieira 2
Marc Oliva 3
Megan Balks 4
Mauro Guglielmin 5
Miguel Angel De Pablo 6
Miguel A. de Pablo 6
Antonio Molina 6
Antonio Fuente Del Campo 6
Miguel Ramos 7
Gabriel Goyanes 8
Ian Meiklejohn 9
I.F. Meiklejohn 9
Andrey Abramov 10
Nikita Demidov 10
Dmitry Fedorov Davydov 10
Alexey Lupachev 10
Elizaveta Rivkina 10
Kamil Láska 1
K. Láska 1
Michaela Kňažková 1
Daniel Nývlt 1
Rossana Raffi 11
Jorge Strelin 12
J A Strelin 12
Toshio Sone 13
Kotaro FUKUI 14
Elya Zazovskaya 15
Nikita Mergelov 15
Nikolay Osokin 16
Vladislav Miamin 17
12
 
Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales Universidad de Cordoba, Córdoba, Argentina
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2018-01-11
scimago Q2
wos Q3
SJR0.535
CiteScore5.2
Impact factor1.6
ISSN1088937X, 19390513
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Geography, Planning and Development
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Abstract
ABSTRACT Monitoring of active layer thawing depth and active layer thickness (ALT), using mechanical pronging and continuous temperature data logging, has been undertaken under the Circumpolar Active Layer Monitoring – South (CALM-S) program at a range of sites across Antarctica. The objective of this study was to summarize key data from sites in different Antarctic regions from 2006 to 2015 to review the state of the active layer in Antarctica and the effectiveness of the CALM-S program. The data from 16 sites involving 8 CALM-S and another 8 boreholes across the Antarctic have been used in the study. Probing for thaw depth, while giving information on local spatial variability, often underestimates the maximum ALT of Antarctic soils compared to that determined using continuous temperature monitoring. The differences are likely to be caused by stones limiting probe penetration and the timing of probing not coinciding with the timing of maximum thaw, which varies between seasons. The information on the active layer depth is still sparse in many regions and the monitoring needs to be extended and continued to provide a better understanding of both spatial and temporal variability in Antarctic soil thermal properties.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
Science of the Total Environment
4 publications, 10.26%
Earth-Science Reviews
3 publications, 7.69%
Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
3 publications, 7.69%
Cryosphere
2 publications, 5.13%
Geoderma Regional
2 publications, 5.13%
Catena
2 publications, 5.13%
Geoscience Data Journal
2 publications, 5.13%
Czech Polar Reports
1 publication, 2.56%
Earth System Science Data
1 publication, 2.56%
Frontiers in Earth Science
1 publication, 2.56%
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
1 publication, 2.56%
Environmental Earth Sciences
1 publication, 2.56%
Scientific Reports
1 publication, 2.56%
Journal of South American Earth Sciences
1 publication, 2.56%
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
1 publication, 2.56%
Frontiers in Environmental Science
1 publication, 2.56%
Polar Record
1 publication, 2.56%
Russian Meteorology and Hydrology
1 publication, 2.56%
Lecture Notes in Earth System Sciences
1 publication, 2.56%
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
1 publication, 2.56%
Data in Brief
1 publication, 2.56%
PLOS Climate
1 publication, 2.56%
Antarctic Science
1 publication, 2.56%
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
1 publication, 2.56%
Eurasian Soil Science
1 publication, 2.56%
1
2
3
4

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Elsevier
16 publications, 41.03%
Wiley
6 publications, 15.38%
Springer Nature
4 publications, 10.26%
Copernicus
3 publications, 7.69%
Frontiers Media S.A.
2 publications, 5.13%
Cambridge University Press
2 publications, 5.13%
Pleiades Publishing
2 publications, 5.13%
1 publication, 2.56%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1 publication, 2.56%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 2.56%
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
1 publication, 2.56%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
39
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Hrbáček F. et al. Active layer monitoring in Antarctica: an overview of results from 2006 to 2015 // Polar Geography. 2018. Vol. 44. No. 3. pp. 217-231.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Hrbáček F., Vieira G., Oliva M., Balks M., Guglielmin M., De Pablo M. A., de Pablo M. A., Molina A., Del Campo A. F., Ramos M., Goyanes G., Meiklejohn I., Meiklejohn I., Abramov A., Demidov N., Fedorov Davydov D., Lupachev A., Rivkina E., Ривкина Е. М., Láska K., Láska K., Kňažková M., Nývlt D., Raffi R., Strelin J., Strelin J. A., Sone T., FUKUI K., Dolgikh A., Zazovskaya E., Mergelov N., Osokin N., Miamin V. Active layer monitoring in Antarctica: an overview of results from 2006 to 2015 // Polar Geography. 2018. Vol. 44. No. 3. pp. 217-231.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1080/1088937X.2017.1420105
UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2017.1420105
TI - Active layer monitoring in Antarctica: an overview of results from 2006 to 2015
T2 - Polar Geography
AU - Hrbáček, Filip
AU - Vieira, Gonçalo
AU - Oliva, Marc
AU - Balks, Megan
AU - Guglielmin, Mauro
AU - De Pablo, Miguel Angel
AU - de Pablo, Miguel A.
AU - Molina, Antonio
AU - Del Campo, Antonio Fuente
AU - Ramos, Miguel
AU - Goyanes, Gabriel
AU - Meiklejohn, Ian
AU - Meiklejohn, I.F.
AU - Abramov, Andrey
AU - Demidov, Nikita
AU - Fedorov Davydov, Dmitry
AU - Lupachev, Alexey
AU - Rivkina, Elizaveta
AU - Ривкина, Е. М.
AU - Láska, Kamil
AU - Láska, K.
AU - Kňažková, Michaela
AU - Nývlt, Daniel
AU - Raffi, Rossana
AU - Strelin, Jorge
AU - Strelin, J A
AU - Sone, Toshio
AU - FUKUI, Kotaro
AU - Dolgikh, Andrey
AU - Zazovskaya, Elya
AU - Mergelov, Nikita
AU - Osokin, Nikolay
AU - Miamin, Vladislav
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/01/11
PB - Taylor & Francis
SP - 217-231
IS - 3
VL - 44
SN - 1088-937X
SN - 1939-0513
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2018_Hrbáček,
author = {Filip Hrbáček and Gonçalo Vieira and Marc Oliva and Megan Balks and Mauro Guglielmin and Miguel Angel De Pablo and Miguel A. de Pablo and Antonio Molina and Antonio Fuente Del Campo and Miguel Ramos and Gabriel Goyanes and Ian Meiklejohn and I.F. Meiklejohn and Andrey Abramov and Nikita Demidov and Dmitry Fedorov Davydov and Alexey Lupachev and Elizaveta Rivkina and Е. М. Ривкина and Kamil Láska and K. Láska and Michaela Kňažková and Daniel Nývlt and Rossana Raffi and Jorge Strelin and J A Strelin and Toshio Sone and Kotaro FUKUI and Andrey Dolgikh and Elya Zazovskaya and Nikita Mergelov and Nikolay Osokin and Vladislav Miamin},
title = {Active layer monitoring in Antarctica: an overview of results from 2006 to 2015},
journal = {Polar Geography},
year = {2018},
volume = {44},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2017.1420105},
number = {3},
pages = {217--231},
doi = {10.1080/1088937X.2017.1420105}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Hrbáček, Filip, et al. “Active layer monitoring in Antarctica: an overview of results from 2006 to 2015.” Polar Geography, vol. 44, no. 3, Jan. 2018, pp. 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2017.1420105.