Open Access
Open access
volume 2 issue 1 pages 11002

Computational phase transitions: benchmarking Ising machines and quantum optimisers

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2021-03-01
scimago Q2
wos Q2
SJR0.641
CiteScore4.7
Impact factor1.9
ISSN2632072X
Computer Science Applications
Information Systems
Computer Networks and Communications
Artificial Intelligence
Abstract

While there are various approaches to benchmark physical processors, recent findings have focused on computational phase transitions. This is due to several factors. Importantly, the hardest instances appear to be well-concentrated in a narrow region, with a control parameter allowing uniform random distributions of problem instances with similar computational challenge. It has been established that one could observe a computational phase transition in a distribution produced from coherent Ising machine(s). In terms of quantum approximate optimisation, the ability for the quantum algorithm to function depends critically on the ratio of a problems constraint to variable ratio (called density). The critical density dependence on performance resulted in what was called, reachability deficits. In this perspective we recall the background needed to understand how to apply computational phase transitions in various bench-marking tasks and we survey several such contemporary findings.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
Mathematics
1 publication, 100%
1

Publishers

1
MDPI
1 publication, 100%
1
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
1
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Philathong H. et al. Computational phase transitions: benchmarking Ising machines and quantum optimisers // Journal of Physics: Complexity. 2021. Vol. 2. No. 1. p. 11002.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Philathong H., Akshay V., Samburskaya K., Biamonte J. Computational phase transitions: benchmarking Ising machines and quantum optimisers // Journal of Physics: Complexity. 2021. Vol. 2. No. 1. p. 11002.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1088/2632-072x/abdadc
UR - https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072x/abdadc
TI - Computational phase transitions: benchmarking Ising machines and quantum optimisers
T2 - Journal of Physics: Complexity
AU - Philathong, H.
AU - Akshay, V.
AU - Samburskaya, Ksenia
AU - Biamonte, J.
PY - 2021
DA - 2021/03/01
PB - IOP Publishing
SP - 11002
IS - 1
VL - 2
SN - 2632-072X
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2021_Philathong,
author = {H. Philathong and V. Akshay and Ksenia Samburskaya and J. Biamonte},
title = {Computational phase transitions: benchmarking Ising machines and quantum optimisers},
journal = {Journal of Physics: Complexity},
year = {2021},
volume = {2},
publisher = {IOP Publishing},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072x/abdadc},
number = {1},
pages = {11002},
doi = {10.1088/2632-072x/abdadc}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Philathong, H., et al. “Computational phase transitions: benchmarking Ising machines and quantum optimisers.” Journal of Physics: Complexity, vol. 2, no. 1, Mar. 2021, p. 11002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072x/abdadc.